Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:53:20.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Village-State Relations in Vietnam: The Effect of Everyday Politics on Decollectivization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2010

Benedict J. Tria Kerkvliet
Get access

Extract

No longer does the state in vietnam require that farm land be aggregated, consolidated, and farmed collectively by work teams under the direction of rural cooperatives. Instead, the state is open to diverse production arrangements. In particular, family farming, which for decades was officially discouraged and outlawed, is now officially celebrated. Households may work their own fields, to which they have use rights (leaseholds) for several years. This is a major policy change, comparable to the shift that occurred in northern Vietnam when the extensive land redistribution of the mid-1950s was followed almost immediately by the collectivizing of that land.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , May 1995 , pp. 396 - 418
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Beresford, Melanie. 1988. Vietnam: Politics, Economics and Society. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Beresford, Melanie. 1989. National Unification and Economic Development in Vietnam. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhaduri, Amit. 1982. “Agricultural Cooperatives and Peasant Participation in the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam.” In Bhaduri, and Anisur Rahman, Md., eds. Studies in Rural Participation, 34–57. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cao Nhu, NguyỆt. 1991. “Diễn Biến và Thực Trạng Đời Sống Nông Dân” [Unfolding Reality of Peasants' Living Conditions]. In Ban Nông Nghiệp Trung Uóng. Kinh Tế-Xā Hội Nông Thôn Việt Nam Ngày Nay, vol. 1. Hanoi: Nxb Tủ Tủỏng-Văn Hôa, 206–51.Google Scholar
Central Committee Secretariat. 1981. “Directive No. 100-Cttu on contractual work.” 13 January. In Joint Publications Research Service (Jprs), “Vietnam Report,” no. 2245, 2 February 1981, pp. 17-23.Google Scholar
Chaliand, Gerard. 1969. The Peasants of North Vietnam. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Chan, Anita, Madsen, Richard, and Unger, Jonathan. 1984. Chen Village: The Recent History of a Peasant Community in Mao's China. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chủ Văn, Lâm, et al. 1992. Chử Vǎn Lâm, Nguyễn Thai Nguyên, Phùng Hữư Phú, Trần Quốc Tỏan, Đặng Thọ Xương. 1992. Hộp Tác Hóa Nông Nghiệp Việt Nam: Lịch Sú, Vấn Bề, Triển Vọng [Agricultural Cooperativization in Vietnam: History, Problems, and Prospects]. Hanoi: Nxb Sư Thật.Google Scholar
“Củng Cố Hợg Tác Xā”. 1981. “Củng Cố Hợg Tác Xā Sản Xuất Nông Nghiệp, Đẩy Mạnh Công Tác Khóan” [Reinforce Agricultural Producer Cooperatives, Speed Up Contract Work]. 1981. A Ministry of Agriculture report. In Lê Thanh Nghi, Cai Tiến Công Tác Khôan Mơ” Rộng Khôan San Phấm để Thúc Đẩy Sản Xuất Củng Cố Hợp Tác Xā Nông Nghịệp. Hanoi: Nxb Sự” Thật, 32–79.Google Scholar
Đặng, Cảnh Khanh. 1991. “Sự Phạn Tầng Xā Hội ở Nông Thôn Miềen Bắc Nuốc Ta Hiện Nay–Thực Trạng và Kiên Nghị [Social Differentiation in the Rural North of our Cuntry Now: Real Situation and Proposals]. In Nam, Pham Xuân, ed. Đổi Mơi Kinh Tế–Xā Hội. Hanoi: Nxb Khoa Học Xā Họi, 413–36.Google Scholar
Đào, thế Tuấn. 1991. “Nhu'ng Lý Thuyết về Kinh Tế Nông Dân” [Theories of Peasant Economy], Thông Tin Lý Luận 11 (166), 10–13.Google Scholar
Đào, thế Tuấn. 1993. “The Peasant Household Economy and Social Change in Vietnam.” Paper for the Vietnam Update conference, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Đòan, Duy Thành. 1985. Hải Phòng trong Chặng Đừơng Đầu của Thơi Ќy Qúa Độ. Hải Phòng: Nxb Hải Phòng.Google Scholar
Fforde, Adam, 1989. The Agrarian Question in North Vietnam. 1974-1979: A Study of Cooperator Resistance to State Policy. Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Gourou, Pierre. 1955. The Peasants of the Tonkin Delta. New Haven: Human Relations Area Files.Google Scholar
Houtart, FranÇois and Lemercinier, Genevieve. 1984. Hai Van: Life in a Vietnamese Commune. London: Zed.Google Scholar
Kelliher, Daniel. 1992. Peasant Power in China: The Era of Rural Reform, 1979-1989. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kerkvliet, Benedict J. Tria. 1990. Everyday Politics in the Philippines. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kerkvliet, Benedict J. Tria. 1993. “Society and State Interactions in Vietnam's Rural Transformation.” Paper for Vietnam Update conference, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Luong, Hy V. 1992. Revolution in the Village: Tradition and Transformation in North Vietnam, 1925-1988. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Management of Cooperatives.” 1977. Vietnamese Studies, no. 51.Google Scholar
Ngo, Vinh Long. 1980. “View from the Village.” Indochina Issues, no. 12 (December): 1ff.Google Scholar
Ngo, Vinh Long. 1988. “Some Aspects of Cooperativization in the Mekong Delta.” In Marr, David and White, Christine, eds., Postwar Vietnam: Dilemmas in Socialist Development, 163–73. Ithaca: Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Ngo Vinh, Long. 1993. “Reform and Rural Development in Vietnam: Impact on Class, Sectoral, and Regional Inequalities.” In Turley, William S. and Selden, Mark, eds., Reinventing Vietnamese Socialism, 165–207. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Nhuan, Nguyen Duc. 1983. “The Contradictions of the Rationalization of Agricultural Space and Work in Vietnam” (trans, by Miriam Atlas). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 7: 363–79.Google Scholar
Huy, NguyēN. 1991. “Hôp Tác Hόa vá Phúόng Húόg Điều Chinh Qúa Trình Tác Hόa Trong Thời Gian Tới Nuôc Ta” [Cooperativization and the Direction of the Cooperativization Readjustment Process in the Country's Near Future]. In Cúóng, Pham Nhú ed. Một Số Vốn Đề Kinh Tế của Hôp T໡c Hóa Nông Nghiêр Việt Nam. Hanoi: Nxb Khoa HôC Xã Hội, 125–73.Google Scholar
Nông Nghiêр Há Bắc 005Bhá Bắ Agriculture]. 1976–78. Published by the Ủy Ban Nông Nghiệp Hà Bắc [Ha Bac province Agricultural Committee].Google Scholar
“Nông Thôn Hải Hủng.” 1991. “Nông Thôn Hải Hủng Kinh Tế Xā Hội, Chính Sách” [The Countryside in Hải Húng Province: Economy, Society, Policies]. 1991. Tạp Chí Xā Hội Học, 2 (34), 33–57.Google Scholar
Jean, Ol. 1989. State and Peasant in Contemporary China: The Political Economy of Village Government. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Phú, Phạm Vān. 1991. “Phân Tầng Xā Hội trong Cộng Động Ngừói Việt h Nông Thôn Miền Bắc Hiện Nay” [Social Strata within the Viet Community in the Northern Region Now]. Tạp Chí Xā Hội Học 2(70), 28–36.Google Scholar
Ba, Phí Vān. 1991. “Hệ Thông Kinh Tế Ho Gia Ðinh Nông Dân Ðồng Bằng: Hiện Trạng và Triển Vọng” [The Peasant Family Economy System in the Plains: Conditions and Prospects]. Tạp Chí Xā Hội Học, 4(36), 31–38.Google Scholar
Gareth, Porter. 1993. Vietnam: The Politics of Bureaucratic Socialism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Political Bureau. 1988. “Nghī Quyệt Bộ Chính Trị, Số 10-Nq/Tw [Political Bureau Decision No. 10].” 5 April.Google Scholar
Trung, Quang. 1987. Agricultural Collectivization and Rural Development in Vietnam: A North/South Study, 1955–1985. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam.Google Scholar
TerryRambo, A. Rambo, A.. 1973. A Comparison of Peasant Social systems of Northern and Southern Viet Nam. Carbondale: Center for Vietnamese Studies.Google Scholar
Renovation. 1990. The Renovation of Agricultural Economic Management: Resolution of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of Vietnam. 1990. Hanoi: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
“Sau 30 Năm.” 1990. “Sau 30 Năm Hóp Tác Hóa Nông Nghiệp: Đới Sống Nông Dân và Vấn Đề Quản Lỳ Sản Xuất Nông Nghiệp Hiện Nay” [After Thirty Years of Agricultural Cooperativization: Peasant Living Conditions and Agricultural Production Management, Problems at Present]. 1990. In Luc, Nguyễn, ed., Thuc Trang Kinh Tê Xā Hôi Việt Nam Giai Đoạn 1986-1990. Hanoi: Tạp Chí Thông Kê, 27–60.Google Scholar
James, Scott. 1986. “Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance.” In Scott, James C. and , Benedict J.Kerkvliet, Tria, eds., Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance in Southeast Asia, 5–35. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Số Liệu Thông Kê. 1991. Số Liệu Thông Kê Nông Nghiệр 35 Năm (1956-1990) [Agricultural Statistics for 35 Years]. 1991. Hanoi: Nxb Thống Kê.Google Scholar
Carl, Thayer. 1992. “Political Reform in Vietnam: Doi Moi and the Emergence of Civil Society.” In Miller, Robert F., ed., The Developments of Civil Society in Communist Systems, 110–29. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Nigel, Thrift and Forbes, Dean. 1986. The Price of War: Urbanization in Vietnam 1954–1985. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Daniel, Thorner, et al., eds., 1986. A.V. Chayanov on The Theory of Peasant Economy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
“Tổng Thuật, Phân Tích.” 1992. “Tổng Thuật, Phân Tích Hệ Thông, Quan Điểm của Đảng trong các Văn Kiện Về Nông Nghiệp và Phát Triền Nông Thôn” [General Description, Systematic Analysis, and Outlook of the Party in Documents Regarding Agriculture and Rural Development]. 1992. Prepared by members of the Ban Nong Nghiep Trung Uong. November. 45 pp.Google Scholar
Đứe, Trán. 1991. Hóр Tác Xā và Thời Vàng Son của Kinh Tể Gia Đình [Cooperatives and the Resplendent Period of the Family Economy]. Hanoi: Nxb Tủ Tứóg-Vān Hóa.Google Scholar
Turley, William S. 1993a. “Party, State, and People: Political Structure and Economic Prospects.” In Turley, William and Selden, Mark, eds., Reinventing Vietnamese Socialism, 257–76. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Turley, William S. 1993b. Political Renovation in Vietnam: Renewal and Adaptation.” In Ljunggren, Borje, ed., The Challenge of Reform in Indochina, 327–47. Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard Institute for International Development, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Andrew, Vickerman. 1986. The Fate of the Peasantry: Premature “Transition to Socialism” in the Democratic Republic of Vietnam. New Haven: Yale University Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Học., Viện Sủ 1991. Viện Sứ Học, Viện Khoa Học Xā Họi Việt Nam [History Institute, Social Sciences Institute of Vietnam]. Việt Nam 1975-1990: Thành Tụu vá Kinh Nghiệm [Vietnam 1975–1990: Achievements and Experiences]. Hanoi: Nxb Sự Thật.Google Scholar
Andrew, Watson. 1983. “Agriculture Looks for ‘Shoes that Fit’: The Production Responsibility System and Its Implications.” World Development 11, no. 8: 703–30.Google Scholar
White, Christine Pelzer. 1982. “Socialist Transformation of Agriculture and Gender Relations: The Vietnamese Case.” Institute of Development Studies Bulletin 13 (Sept), 44–51.Google Scholar
White, Christine Pelzer. 1985. “Agricultural Planning, Pricing Policy and Co-operatives in Vietnam.” World Development 13 (January): 97–114.Google Scholar
Nancy, Wiegersma. 1988. Vietnam: Peasant Land, Peasant Revolution, Patriarchy and Collectivity in the Rural Economy. N.Y.: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Brantly, Womack. 1987. “The Party and the People: Revolutionary and Postrevolutionary Politics in China and Vietnam.” World Politics (July): 479–507.Google Scholar
Brantly, Womack. 1992. “Reform in Vietnam: Backwards Toward the Future.” Government and Opposition 27 (Spring): 177–89.Google Scholar
Alexander, Woodside. 1979. “Nationalism and Poverty in the Breakdown of Sino-Vietnamese Relations.” Pacific Affairs 52 (Fall): 381–409.Google Scholar
Alexander, Woodside. 1989. “Peasants and the State in the Aftermath of the Vietnamese Revolution.” Peasant Studies 16 (Summer): 283–97.Google Scholar