Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T03:00:06.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Segregation as Efficiency? Group-Specific Institutions in North India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2021

Nirvikar Jassal Open the ORCID record for Nirvikar Jassal [Opens in a new window]
Nirvikar Jassal*
Affiliation:
Nirvikar Jassal (njassal@stanford.edu) is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the King Center on Global Development at Stanford University.
Get access

Abstract

A number of nations have instituted group-specific institutions or “enclaves” for women. The assumption underpinning such bodies—physically distinct, autonomous units in which constituent members belong entirely to a particular group—is that the segregation of female administrators will better serve the interests of women by isolating them from patriarchal norms and practices. I scrutinize this assumption by examining India's experience with all-women police stations, and carry out eight months of ethnographic research in and around police stations across the states of Haryana and Uttar Pradesh. I find that while all-women police stations allow complainants to speak freely, they may also diminish capacity for female administrators working in law enforcement, create hurdles for victims of violence, and, in some ways, marginalize gender issues from the mainstream.

Keywords

bureaucracygenderpolicerepresentationsexual violenceSouth Asia
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 80 , Issue 3 , August 2021 , pp. 631 - 661
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

List of References

Barn, Ravinder, and Kumari, Ved. 2015. “Understanding Complainant Credibility in Rape Appeals: A Case Study of High Court Judgments and Judges’ Perspectives in India.” British Journal of Criminology 55 (3): 435–53.10.1093/bjc/azu112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrick, Kelle, Hickman, Matthew J., and Strom, K. J.. 2014. “Representative Policing and Violence Towards the Police.” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 8 (2): 193–204.10.1093/police/pau013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaman, Lori, Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, Duflo, Esther, Pande, Rohini, and Topalova, Petia. 2009. “Powerful Women: Does Exposure Reduce Bias?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (4): 1497–1540.10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaman, Lori, Duflo, Esther, Pande, Rohini, and Topalova, Petia. 2012. “Female Leadership Raises Aspirations and Educational Attainment for Girls: A Policy Experiment in India.” Science 335 (6068): 582–86.10.1126/science.1212382CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berk, Richard A., and Newton, Phyllis J.. 1985. “Does Arrest Really Deter Wife Battery? An Effort to Replicate the Findings of the Minneapolis Spouse Abuse Experiment.” American Sociological Review 50 (2): 253–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Thomas Jr. 1976. “Unobtrusive Measures: An Inventory of Uses.” Sociological Methods & Research 4 (3): 267–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Business Standard India. 2013. “Proposal for More Women Counselling Centres at Police Stations.” March 11.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, and Duflo, Esther. 2004. “Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India.” Econometrica 72 (5): 1409–43.Google Scholar
Chhibber, Pradeep, and Jassal, Nirvikar. 2018a. “India in 2017: The BJP, Economic Reform, and Contentious Politics.” Asian Survey 58 (1): 86–99.10.1525/as.2018.58.1.86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chhibber, Pradeep, and Jassal, Nirvikar. 2018b. “Next Steps after the 377 Judgment: It Is Time That Marital Rape is Criminalised.” The Hindu, October 11.Google Scholar
Craig, John M. 1994. “The Woman's Peace Party and Questions of Gender Separatism.” Peace & Change 19 (4): 373–98.10.1111/j.1468-0130.1994.tb00663.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duflo, Esther. 2005. “Why Political Reservations?” Journal of the European Economic Association 3 (2): 668–78.10.1162/jeea.2005.3.2-3.668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, Geraldine. 1999. Women in Modern India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forbes, Geraldine. 2005. Women in Colonial India: Essays on Politics, Medicine, and Historiography. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar
Freedman, Estelle. 1979. “Separatism as Strategy: Female Institution Building and American Feminism, 1870–1930.” Feminist Studies 5 (3): 512–529.10.2307/3177511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1978. “Some Thoughts on Separatism and Power.” Sinister Wisdom 6:30–39.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Aideen, Srivastava, Devyani, Daruwala, Maja, and Prasad, Devika. 2015. Rough Roads to Equality: Women Police in South Asia. New Delhi: Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative.Google Scholar
Government of India. 1999. Constituent Assembly Debates. New Delhi: Lok Sabha Secretariat.Google Scholar
Government of India. 2013. “Criminal Law Amendment Act: Ministry of Law and Justice.” Gazette of India, April 2.Google Scholar
Hautzinger, Sarah J. 2007. Violence in the City of Women: Police and Batterers in Bahia, Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520941151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickman, Matthew J., and Piquero, Alex R.. 2009. “Organizational, Administrative, and Environmental Correlates of Complaints about Police Use of Force: Does Minority Representation Matter?” Crime & Delinquency 55 (1): 3–27.10.1177/0011128708316977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Home Secretary. 2009. “Advisory Women Police: Nirmaljeet Kalsi.” F.NO.15011/48/2009. April 9.Google Scholar
Home Secretary. 2013. “Advisory Women Police: R.K. Singh.” D.O. No. 15011/21/2013. April 22.Google Scholar
Home Secretary. 2014. “Advisory Women Police.” D.O. No. 15011/90/2012.Google Scholar
Home Secretary. 2015. “Advisory Comprehensive Approach Toward Crimes against Women: Kumar Alok.” D.O. No. 15011/22/2015. May 12.Google Scholar
Hoyle, Carolyn, and Sanders, Andrew. 2000. “Police Response to Domestic Violence.” British Journal of Criminology 40 (1): 14–36.10.1093/bjc/40.1.14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2009. “Broken System: Dysfunction, Abuse, and Impunity in the Indian Police.” https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/india0809web.pdf (accessed January 25, 2021).Google Scholar
IIPS (International Institute for Population Sciences). 2017. “India National Family Health Survey NFHS-4 2015-16.” https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR339/FR339.pdf (accessed January 29, 2021).Google Scholar
Iyer, Lakshmi, Mani, Anandi, Mishra, Prachi, and Topalova, Petia. 2012. “The Power of Political Voice: Women's Political Representation and Crime in India.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 4 (4): 165–93.Google Scholar
Jassal, Nirvikar. 2020. “Gender, Law Enforcement, and Access to Justice: Evidence from All- Women Police Stations in India.” American Political Science Review 114 (4): 1035–54.10.1017/S0003055420000684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensenius, Francesca. 2017. Social Justice through Inclusion: The Consequences of Electoral Quotas in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190646608.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, Preeti. 2016. “Are India's All-Women Police Stations Helping to Combat Gender Vio- lence?” Scroll.in, November 3. https://scroll.in/article/819369/are-indias-all-women-police-stations-helping-to-combat-gender-violence (accessed January 25, 2021).Google Scholar
Johari, Aarefa. 2019. “Forced Counselling, Moralising: The Difficulties of Filing Dowry Harassment Cases under Section 498A.” Scroll.in, December 5.Google Scholar
Karim, Sabrina. 2017. “Restoring Confidence in Post-Conflict Security Sectors: Survey Evidence from Liberia on Female Ratio Balancing Reforms.” British Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 799–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karim, Sabrina. 2020. “Relational State Building in Areas of Limited Statehood: Experimental Evidence on the Attitudes of the Police.” American Political Science Review 114 (2): 536–51.10.1017/S0003055419000716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karim, Sabrina, Gilligan, Michael J., Blair, Robert, and Beardsley, Kyle. 2018. “International Gender Balancing Reforms in Postconflict Countries: Lab-in-the-Field Evidence from the Liberian National Police.” International Studies Quarterly 62 (3): 618–31.10.1093/isq/sqy009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Mendelberg, Tali. 2018. “Do Enclaves Remediate Social Inequality?” Journal of Politics 80 (4): 1134–49.10.1086/698756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiser, L., Wilkins, Vicky M., Meier, Kenneth J., and Holland, Catherine A.. 2002. “Lipstick and Logarithms: Gender, Institutional Context, and Representative Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review 96 (3): 553–64.10.1017/S0003055402000321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerber, Linda K. 1988. “Separate Spheres, Female Worlds, Woman's Place: The Rhetoric of Women's History.” Journal of American History 75 (1): 9–39.Google Scholar
Kessler-Harris, Alice. 1989. “Gender Ideology in Historical Reconstruction: A Case Study from the 1930s.” Gender & History 1 (1): 31–49.10.1111/j.1468-0424.1989.tb00233.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kethineni, Sesha, and Srinivasan, Murugesan. 2009. “Police Handling of Domestic Violence Cases in Tamil Nadu, India.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 25 (2): 202–13.10.1177/1043986209333591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kethineni, Sesha, and Srinivasan, Murugesan. 2013. “All-Women Police Stations in Tamil Nadu and Their Focus on Crimes Against Women.” In Crime and Justice in India, edited by Unnithan, N. Prabha, 155–75. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerman, Amy E., and Weaver, Vesla M.. 2014. Arresting Citizenship: The Democratic Consequences of American Crime Control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226137971.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Susan E. 1986. “In Defense of Separate Spheres: Class and Status Politics in the Antisuffrage Movement.” Social Forces 65 (2): 327–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Susan. 1982. Breaking and Entering: Policewomen on Patrol. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Susan. 1999. “Police Force or Police Service? Gender and Emotional Labor.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 561 (1): 111–26.10.1177/000271629956100108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrary, Justin. 2007. “The Effect of Court-Ordered Hiring Quotas on the Composition and Quality of Police.” American Economic Review 97 (1): 318–53.10.1257/aer.97.1.318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth, and Nicholson-Crotty, Jill. 2006. “Gender, Representative Bureaucracy, and Law Enforcement: The Case of Sexual Assault.” Public Administration Review 66 (6): 850–60.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00653.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelberg, Tali, Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Baxter Oliphant, J.. 2014. “Gender Inequality in Deliberation: Unpacking the Black Box of Interaction.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (1): 18–44.10.1017/S1537592713003691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Amalia R., and Segal, Carmit. 2019. “Do Female Officers Improve Law Enforcement Quality? Effects on Crime Reporting and Domestic Violence.” Review of Economic Studies 86 (5): 2220–47.Google Scholar
Natarajan, Mangai. 1996. “Women Police Units in India: A New Direction.” Police Studies: The International Review of Police Development 19 (2): 63–75.10.1108/13639519610123181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natarajan, Mangai. 2005. “Women Police Stations as a Dispute Processing System.” Women & Criminal Justice 16 (1): 87–106.10.1300/J012v16n01_04CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natarajan, Mangai. 2008. Women Police in a Changing Society: Back Door to Equality. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Nelson, Sara. 1996. “Constructing and Negotiating Gender in Women's Police Stations in Brazil.” Latin American Perspectives 23 (1): 131–48.10.1177/0094582X9602300109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldenburg, Veena Talwar. 2002. Dowry Murder: The Imperial Origins of a Cultural Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ozkan, Turgut, Worrall, John L., and Piquero, Alex R.. 2016. “Does Minority Representation in Police Agencies Reduce Assaults on the Police?” American Journal of Criminal Justice 41 (3): 402–23.10.1007/s12103-016-9338-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, Michael Quinn. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Perova, Elizaveta, and Reynolds, Sarah Anne. 2017. “Women's Police Stations and Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence from Brazil.” Social Science & Medicine 174:188–96.10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Police Act Drafting Committee. 2006. “Model Police Act.” Ministry of Home Affairs. https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/ModelAct06_30_Oct_0.pdf (accessed January 29, 2021).Google Scholar
Pruitt, Lesley J. 2016. The Women in Blue Helmets: Gender, Policing, and the UN's First All-Female Peacekeeping Unit. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
PTI. 1983. “Separate Women's Police Wing Opposed.” Times of India, April 17.Google Scholar
Rabe-Hemp, Cara E. 2009. “POLICEwomen or PoliceWOMEN? Doing Gender and Police Work.” Feminist Criminology 4 (2): 114–29.10.1177/1557085108327659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, Doris. 1993. “Doubts Over Efficacy of All-Woman Cop Stations: Analysis.” Times of India, August 29.Google Scholar
Riccucci, Norma M., Van Ryzin, Gregg G., and Li, Huafang. 2016. “Representative Bureaucracy and the Willingness to Coproduce: An Experimental Study.” Public Administration Review 76 (1): 121–30.10.1111/puar.12401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Rosalind. 1982. Beyond Separate Spheres: Intellectual Roots of Modern Feminism. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Herbert J., and Rubin, Irene S.. 2012. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ruiz, Rebecca. 2006. “India's All-Women Police Pursue Dowry Complaints.” Women's eNews, September 13. https://womensenews.org/2006/09/indias-all-women-police-pursue-dowry-complaints/ (accessed January 31, 2021).Google Scholar
Ryan, Barbara. 1989. “Ideological Purity and Feminism: The US Women's Movement from 1966 to 1975.” Gender & Society 3 (2): 239–57.10.1177/089124389003002005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabha, Lok. 2012. Working Conditions of Women in the Police Force: 21st Report. New Delhi: Committee on Empowerment of Women, Parliament of India.Google Scholar
Santos, Cecilia. 2004. “En-gendering the Police: Women's Police Stations and Feminism in Sao Paulo.” Latin American Research Review 39 (3): 29–55.Google Scholar
Santos, Cecilia. 2005. Women's Police Stations: Gender, Violence, and Justice in São Paulo, Brazil. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schulz, Dorothy Moses. 2004. “A Precinct of Their Own: The New York City Women's Precinct, 1921–1923.” New York History 85 (1): 39–64.Google Scholar
Schutt, Russell K. 2018. Investigating the Social World: The Process and Practice of Research. 9th ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W., and Berk, Richard A.. 1984. “The Specific Deterrent Effects of Arrest for Domestic Assault.” American Sociological Review 49 (2): 261–72.10.2307/2095575CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherman, Lawrence W., Smith, Douglas A., Schmidt, Janell D., and Rogan, Dennis P.. 1992. “Crime, Punishment, and Stake in Conformity: Legal and Informal Control of Domestic Violence.” American Sociological Review 57 (5): 680–90.Google Scholar
Shugar, Dana R. 1995. Separatism and Women's Community. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Soss, Joe, and Weaver, Vesla. 2017. “Police Are Our Government: Politics, Political Science, and the Policing of Race–Class Subjugated Communities.” Annual Review of Political Science 20:565–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spain, Daphne. 1993. “Gendered Spaces and Women's Status.” Sociological Theory 11 (2): 137.10.2307/202139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalans, Loretta. 1996. “Family Harmony or Individual Protection?: Public Recommendations about How Police Can Handle Domestic Violence Situations.” American Behavioral Scientist 39 (4): 433–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supreme Court of India. 2014. “Arnesh Kumar vs State of Bihar.” Appeal No. 1277, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, July 2.Google Scholar
Talwari, Gaurav. 2018. “Women Police Stations Draw Tepid Response.” Times of India, January 22. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/srinagar/women-police-stations-draw-tepid-response/articleshow/62600414.cms (accessed January 29, 2021).Google Scholar
Theobald, Nick A., and Haider-Markel, Donald P.. 2008. “Race, Bureaucracy, and Symbolic Representation: Interactions between Citizens and Police.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (2): 409–26.10.1093/jopart/mun006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Frank J. 1976. “Minority Groups in Public Bureaucracies Are Passive and Active Representation Linked?” Administration & Society 8 (2): 201–26.10.1177/009539977600800206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TNN. 1995. “All-Women Police Station in Bihar.” Times of India, October 6.Google Scholar
US Congress. 1925. Woman's Bureau, Police Department, D.C. Hearings Before the United States Senate Committee on the District of Columbia, and Senate Subcommittee on S. 4308, and House Committee on the District of Columbia, Subcommittee on S. 4308. Washington: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
US Congress. 1926. Woman's Bureau, Police Department, D.C. Hearings Before the United States Senate Committee on the District of Columbia. Washington: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Vira, Dharma, and Krishnaswamy Reddy, Chairman N.. 1980. Fifth Report of the National Police Commission, 1980. New Delhi: Government of India Press.Google Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 2010. “Reflections on Ethnographic Work in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 13:255–72.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Jassal supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Jassal supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 6 MB