Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:33:07.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Quest for Legal Certainty and the Reorganization of Power: Struggles over Forest Law, Permits, and Rights in Indonesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2015

Get access

Abstract

Amid the rapid expansion of oil palm plantations, the Indonesian Ministry of Forestry finds its authority over the forested areas (kawasan hutan) under pressure and continues to pursue strategies to legally maintain the areas within its jurisdiction. Combining insights from legal studies with political economy, this article applies the concept of “political forests” to contemporary contestations and the development of “rule of law” in relation to Indonesia's forested areas. Establishing legal certainty and “rule of law” are widely asserted to be important but never fully achieved. Two cases demonstrate this: the first focuses on the negotiated resolution of overlapping permits in the kawasan hutan between the center and the region in Central Kalimantan Province. The second examines the maneuvers of the Ministry of Forestry to (re)assert its authority over kawasan hutan by classifying palm oil as a tree crop. The article concludes that the widespread quest for certainty and rule of law is quixotic because it ignores the realities of political economy, including social conflict, beneath the veneer of law.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Andreanto, Galih. 2013. “Supersemar Kehutanan” [Forestry “Supersemar”]. Kompas. March 30. http://www.kpa.or.id/?p=1355&lang=en (accessed June 17, 2013).Google Scholar
Antara News. 2010. “Kelapa sawit boleh ditanam di hutan produksi” [Oil palm may be planted in production forest]. February 10. http://www.antaranews.com/berita/1265739548/kelapa-sawit-boleh-ditanam-di-hutan-produksi (accessed June 19, 2013).Google Scholar
Arizona, Yance, Mary, Siti Rakhma, and Negara, Grahat. 2012. Anotasi Putusan MK No. 45/PUU-IX/2011: Mengenai pengujian konstitusionalitas kawasan hutan dalam Pasal 1 Angka 3 UU No.41 Tahun 1999 tentang kehutanan [Annotation of Constitutional Court Decision Number 45/PUU-IX/2011: Regarding the test of the constitutionality of kawasan hutan in Article 1(3) of Law No. 41, 1999, on forestry]. Jakarta: HuMa.Google Scholar
Asia Sentinel. 2015. “Indonesia Hearings Reveal Forest Ravages.” January 8. http://www.asiasentinel.com/econ-business/indonesia-hearings-reveal-forest-ravages/ (accessed January 8, 2015).Google Scholar
Aspinall, Ed, and Van Klinken, Gerry. 2011. “The State and Illegality in Indonesia.” In The State and Illegality in Indonesia, eds. Aspinall, Ed and van Klinken, Gerry, 130. Leiden: KITLV Press.Google Scholar
Barber, Charles V. 1989. The State, the Environment, and Development: The Genesis and Transformation of Social Forestry Policy in New Order Indonesia. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bedner, Adriaan. 2010. “An Elementary Approach to the Rule of Law.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 2:4874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, Lauren. 2009. “Not Just a Concept: Institutions and the ‘Rule of Law.’Journal of Asian Studies 68(1):117–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BKPM (Indonesia Investment Coordinating Board). 1999. “The Law of the Republic of Indonesia, Number 41 Year 1999 on Forestry.” Official translation. http://www.bkpm.go.id/file_uploaded/Law_4199.htm (accessed January 29, 2014).Google Scholar
BPN (Badan Pertanahan Nasional). 2010. Rencana strategis Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republic Indonesia Tahun 2010-2014 [Strategic plan of the National Land Agency of Indonesia, 2010-2014]. Jakarta: BPN.Google Scholar
Broekhoven, Guido, Savenije, Herman, and Von Scheliha, Stefanie, eds. 2012. Moving Forward with Forest Governance. Wageningen, Netherlands: Tropenbos International. http://www.tropenbos.org/publications/etfrn+news+53:+moving+forward+with+forest+governance (accessed June 19, 2013).Google Scholar
Bullinger, Cathrin, and Haug, Michaela. 2012. “In and Out of the Forest: Decentralisation and Recentralisation of Forest Governance in East Kalimantan, Indonesia.” ASEAS – Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies 5(2):243–62.Google Scholar
Bunker, Stephen G. 1994. “The Political Economy of Raw Materials Extraction and Trade.” In Industrial Ecology and Global Change, eds. Socolow, Robert, Andrews, C., and Berkhout, F. Thomas, 437–50. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunker, Stephen G., and Ciccantell, Paul S.. 2005. Globalization and the Race for Resources. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calavita, Kitty. 2010. Invitation to Law & Society: An Introduction to the Study of Real Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Toby. 2010. Delusions of Development: The World Bank and the Post-Washington Consensus in Southeast Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrothers, Thomas. 2003. “Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: The Problem of Knowledge.” Democracy and Rule of Law Project No. 34. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Casson, Anne. 1999. The Hesitant Boom: Indonesia's Oil Palm Sub-sector in an Era of Economic Crisis and Political Change. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.Google Scholar
Colchester, Marcus, Jiwan, Norman, Andiko, , Sirait, Martua, Firdaus, Asep Yunan, Surambo, A., and Pane, Herbert. 2006. Promised Land: Palm Oil and Land Acquisition in Indonesia: Implications for Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples. Moreton-in-Marsh, England: Forest Peoples Programme, Perkumpulan Sawit Watch, HuMa and the World Agroforestry Centre.Google Scholar
Colfer, Carol J. Pierce, Capistrano, Doris, Dahal, Ganga Ram, and Moeliono, Moira, eds. 2008. Lessons from Forest Decentralization: Money, Justice, and the Quest for Good Governance in Asia-Pacific. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Contreras-Hermosilla, Arnoldo, and Fay, Chip. 2005. Strengthening Forest Management in Indonesia Through Land Tenure Reform: Issues and Framework for Action. Bogor, Indonesia: Forest Trends, ICRAF, and the World Bank.Google Scholar
Cribb, Robert. 2011. “A System of Exemptions: Historicizing State Illegality in Indonesia.” In The State and Illegality in Indonesia, eds. Aspinall, Edward and van Klinken, George, 3144. Leiden: KITLV Press.Google Scholar
Department of Forestry (Indonesia). 2012. Data statistik Departemen Kehutanan [Forestry Department statistics 2011]. Jakarta: Department of Forestry.Google Scholar
Diansyah, Febri, Fariz, Donal, and Yuntho, Emerson. 2012. Pemberantasan kejahatan kehutanan setengah hati: Laporan hasil penelitian kinerja pemberantasan korupsi dan pencucian uang di sektor kehutanan [Half-hearted efforts to eradicate forest crimes: Research report on corruption and money laundering eradication performance in the forestry sector]. Jakarta: Indonesian Corruption Watch in cooperation with Kontak Rakyat Borneo and Save our Borneo, with support from Kemitraan (Partnership).Google Scholar
Dick, Howard. 2007. “Why Law Reform Fails.” In Law Reform in Developing States, ed. Lindsey, Tim, 4264. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dijk, Kees Van, and Savenije, Herman. 2010. Oil Palm or Forests? More Than a Question of Definition. Policy brief. Wageningen, Netherlands: Tropenbos International.Google Scholar
Epistema, HuMa, FKKM, Working Group Tenure, KPA, KPSHK, AMAN, Pusaka, Kemitraan, JKPP, SAINS, KARSA, KKI Warsi, JAVLEC, Scale Up, The Samdhana Institute, and Yayasan Bioma. 2011. Menuju kepastian dan keadilan tenurial [Towards tenure security and justice]. Jakarta: Epistema Institute.Google Scholar
Fay, Chip, and Sirait, Martua. 2002. “Reforming the Reformists: Challenges to Government Forestry Reform in Post-Soeharto Indonesia.” In Which Way Forward? People, Forests, and Policymaking in Indonesia, eds. Colfer, Carol J. Pierce and Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja, 126–43. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Fried, Stephanie T. 1995. “Writing for Their Lives: Bentian Dayak Authors and Indonesian Development Discourse.” PhD diss., Cornell University.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law & Society Review 9:95160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaventa, John. 1980. Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Gellert, Paul K. 2008. “What's New with the Old? Scalar Dialectics and the Reorganization of Indonesia's Timber Industry.” In Taking Southeast Asia to Market: Commodities, Nature and People in the Neoliberal Age, eds. Nevins, Joseph and Peluso, Nancy Lee, 4355. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gellert, Paul K. 2009. “The Politics of Governance of Indonesia's Forest Industries: Progress and Regress in a Neo-liberal Age.” In Governance and the Depoliticisation of Development, eds. Hout, Wil and Robison, Richard, 107–20. London: Routledge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellert, Paul K. 2010. “Extractive Regimes: Toward a Better Understanding of Indonesian Development.” Rural Sociology 75(1):2857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Globe Journal. 2013. “Kemenhut dibantah Greenpeace turunkan deforestasi hutan” [Minister of Forestry debated by Greenpeace on reduction of deforestation]. April 23. http://theglobejournal.com/lingkungan/kemenhut-dibantah-greenpeace-turunkan-deforestasi-hutan/index.php (accessed June 17, 2013).Google Scholar
Government of Indonesia. 2002. PP34/2002 tata hutan dan penyusunan rencana pengelolaan hutan, pemanfaatan hutan dan penggunaan kawasan hutan [Regulation 34/2002 Forest governance and forest management planning]. http://www.bkprn.org/peraturan/the_file/PP_34-2002_TataHutan.pdf (accessed May 4, 2015).Google Scholar
Government Of Indonesia. 2014. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, as Amended by the First Amendment of 1999, the Second Amendment of 2000, the Third Amendment of 2001 and the Fourth Amendment of 2002. Washington, D.C.: Embassy of Indonesia. http://www.embassyofindonesia.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/IndonesianConstitution.pdf (accessed May 3, 2015).Google Scholar
Hadiz, Vedi. 2010. Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hadiz, Vedi, and Robison, Richard. 2013. “Beyond Oligarchy? Critical Exchanges on Political Power and Material Inequality in Indonesia.” Indonesia 96:3557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Derek, Hirsch, Philip, and Li, Tania. 2011. Powers of Exclusion: Land Dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Singapore: NUS Press and Manoa: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwell, Emily, and Lynch, Owen. 2002. Whose Resources? Whose Common Good? Towards a New Paradigm of Environmental Justice and the National Interest in Indonesia. Jakarta: CIEL, in collaboration with HuMa, ELSAM, ICEL, and ICRAF.Google Scholar
Ho, Peter. 2001. “Who Owns China's Land: Property Rights and Deliberate Institutional Ambiguity.” China Quarterly 166:394421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hout, Wil, and Robison, Richard, eds. 2009. Governance and the Depoliticisation of Development. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Indrayana, Denny. 2008. Indonesian Constitutional Reform, 1999-2002: An Evaluation of Constitution-Making in Transition. Jakarta: Kompas Book Publishing.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 1990. State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in their Place. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Kontan Online. 2011. “Menhut resmi cabut Permenhut Nomor 62 tentang izin usaha pada HTI” [Minister of Forestry officially revokes Ministerial Regulation Number 62 regarding permits for forest plantations]. http://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/menhut-resmi-cabut-permenhut-nomor-62-tentang-izin-usaha-pada-hti-1 (accessed March 23, 2013).Google Scholar
Kusters, Koen, de Foresta, Hubert, Ekadinata, Andree, and van Noordwijk, Meine. 2007. “Towards Solutions for State vs. Local Community Conflicts Over Forestland: The Impact of Formal Recognition of User Rights in Krui, Sumatra, Indonesia.” Human Ecology 35:427–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lev, Daniel. 1985. “Colonial Law and the Genesis of the Indonesian State.” Indonesia 40:5774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lev, Daniel. 2007. “State and Law Reform in Indonesia.” In Law Reform in Developing States, ed. Lindsey, Tim, 236–67. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, Tania Murray. 2007. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development and the Practice of Politics. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Liddle, R. William. 2013. “Improving the Quality of Democracy in Indonesia: Toward a Theory of Action.” Indonesia 96:5980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsey, Tim. 2001. “The Criminal State: Premanisme and the New Indonesia.” In Indonesia Today, eds. Lloyd, Grayson J. and Smith, Shannon L., 283–94. Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
Lindsey, Tim. 2004. “Devaluing Asian Values, Rewriting Rule of Law.” In Asian Discourses of Rule of Law: Theories and Implementation of Rule of Law in Twelve Asian Countries, France and the U.S., ed. Peerenboom, Randall, 286323. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsey, Tim. 2007. “Legal Infrastructure and Governance Reform in Post-Crisis Asia.” In Law Reform in Developing and Transitional States, ed. Lindsey, Tim, 341. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John F. 2000. “The Changing Regime: Forest Property and Reformasi in Indonesia.” Development and Change 31:91129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Forestry (Indonesia). 2011. Keputusan Menteri Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor SK.292/Menhut-II/2011 [Decision of the Minister of Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia Number 292/Menhut-II/2011].Google Scholar
Ministry Of Forestry (Indonesia). 2012a. Surat Edaran Menteri Kehutanan Nomor: SE.3/Menhut-II/2012 Tanggal 3 Mei 2012 [Circular Letter of the Minister of Forestry Number SE.3/Menhut-II/2012 Tanggal 3 Mei 2012]. http://www.rimbawan.com/images/stories/aturan-pdf/2012/se%2002%20menhut%20vi%20bikphh%202012.pdf (accessed May 3, 2015).Google Scholar
Ministry Of Forestry (Indonesia). 2012b. Matrik permohonan pelepasan kawasan hutan keterlanjuran sesuai PP 60 Tahun 2012 [Matrix of requests for release of irrevocable forest area in accord with Regulation 60 of 2012]. http://www.dephut.go.id/index.php/news/details/9370 (accessed January 29, 2014).Google Scholar
Natalia, Gloria. 2011. “Gapki: Menhut tak serius perhatikan sawit” [Palm Oil Business Association: Minister of Forestry not paying serious attention to oil palm]. Bisnis.com. September 27. http://industri.bisnis.com/read/20110927/99/47929/gapki-menhut-tak-serius-perhatikan-sawit (accessed June 28, 2013).Google Scholar
National Land Use Planning Agency. 2015. Status perda RTRW kabupaten/kota [Status of sub-region/city land use planning regulations]. Jakarta: Badan Koordinasi Tata Ruang Nasional. http://v2.bkprn.org/?page_id=1157 (accessed May 3, 2015).Google Scholar
Obidzinski, Krystof, Andriani, Rubeta, Komarudin, Heru, and Andrianto, Agus. 2012. “Environmental and Social Impacts of Oil Palm Plantations and Their Implications for Biofuel Production in Indonesia.” Ecology and Society 17(1):25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocko, Jonathan K., and Gilmartin, David. 2009a. “State, Sovereignty, and the People: A Comparison of the ‘Rule of Law’ in China and India.” Journal of Asian Studies 68(1):55100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocko, Jonathan K., and Gilmartin, David. 2009b. “Response to Comments on Our Paper.” Journal of Asian Studies 68(1):127–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 2004. “Why the Rule of Law Matters.” Journal of Democracy 15:3246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohnesorge, John K. M. 2007. “Asia's Legal Systems in the Wake of the Financial Crisis: Can the Rule of Law Carry Any of the Weight?” In Neoliberalism and Institutional Reform in East Asia, ed. Woo, Meredith Jung-En, 6388. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patlis, Jason. 2007. “Indonesia's New Fisheries Law: Will It Encourage Sustainable Management or Exacerbate Over-Exploitation?Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 42(2):201–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall. 2009. “Rule of Law in China and India: A Historical-Cultural Approach.” Journal of Asian Studies 68(1):111–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peluso, Nancy Lee, and Vandergeest, Peter. 2001. “Genealogies of the Political Forest and Customary Rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand.” Journal of Asian Studies 60(3):761812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepinsky, Thomas B. 2013. “Pluralism and Political Conflict in Indonesia.” Indonesia 96:81100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribot, Jesse C., and Peluso, Nancy Lee. 2003. “A Theory of Access.” Rural Sociology 68(2):153–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, William I. 2004. A Theory of Global Capitalism: Production, Class and State in a Transnational World. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison, Richard. 1986. Indonesia: The Rise of Capital. North Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Robison, Richard, and Hadiz, Vedi R.. 2004. Reorganising Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets. New York: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Santos, Alvaro. 2006. “The World Bank's Uses of the ‘Rule of Law’ Promise in Economic Development.” In The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal, eds. Trubeck, David and Santos, Alvaro, 253300. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Julia C. 2009. “Forestry Reform and the Transformation of State Capacity in Fin-de-Siecle China.” Journal of Asian Studies 68(4):1163–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suhendar, Endang, and Kasim, Ifdal, 1996. Tanah sebagai komoditas [Land as commodity]. Jakarta: ELSAM.Google Scholar
Tahyar, Benjamin H. 2012. “Patrimonialism, Power and the Politics of Judicial Reform in Post-Soeharto Indonesia: An Institutional Analysis.” PhD diss., University of London. http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/15945 (accessed December 3, 2013).Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2011. “The Primacy of Society and the Failures of Law and Development.” Cornell International Law Journal 44(2):209–48.Google Scholar
UNDP Indonesia. 2013. Indeks tata kelola hutan, lahan, dan REDD + 2012 di Indonesia [2012 index of forest management, land, and REDD+ in Indonesia]. May 6. Jakarta: UN-REDD Programme. http://www.undp.org/content/indonesia/en/home/library/environment_energy/indeks-tata-kelola-hutan---lahan--dan-redd--2012-di-indonesia/ (accessed June 17, 2013).Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. 1996. What Should Legal Analysis Become? New York: Verso.Google Scholar
VetoNews. 2010. “Kerugian negara di kawasan hutan kalteng capai rp. 16 triliun” [State losses in central Kalimantan forested areas reach rp. 16 trillion]. February 14.Google Scholar
VIVAnews. 2010. “Definisi mafia hukum menurut satgas” [Definition of legal mafia according to the commission]. January 8. http://us.nasional.news.viva.co.id/news/read/119677-definisi_mafia_hukum_menurut_satgas (accessed March 18, 2013).Google Scholar
WALHI (Friends of the Earth Indonesia). 2011. “Surat terbuka menuntut pencabutan permenhut nomor: P.62/Menhut-II/2011 tentang pedoman pembangunan hutan tanaman berbagai jenis pada izin usaha pemanfaatan hasil hutan kayu pada hutan tanaman industri (IUPHHK-HTI)” [Open letter demanding the revocation of ministerial decision number: P.62/Menhut-II/2011 regarding guidelines for the development of tree plantations of various types in industrial tree plantation permit areas (IUPHHK-HTI)]. Jakarta: WALHI.Google Scholar
Winters, Jeffrey A. 2011. Oligarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, Jeffrey A. 2013. “Oligarchy and Democracy in Indonesia.” Indonesia 96:99122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar