Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:26:10.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liang Shih-i and the Communications Clique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Stephen R. MacKinnon
Get access

Abstracts

Through an examination of the career of Liang Shih-i (1869–1933) and the “Communications” clique of railway and financial administrators, the intention is to illuminate the nonmilitary side of the late Ch'ing to early Republic transition. Although Liang and such associates as Yeh Kung-cho and Kuan Keng-lin dealt with modernization of communications and financial institutions, the patterns of their careers fit a more traditional mold. Liang held a chin-shih degree; the others also had scholarly gentry backgrounds. Unlike their well known contemporary, Sheng Hsuan-huai, they were not entrepreneurs as well as bureaucrats. Crucial to the rise of these men first to bureaucratic and then, during the Republican period, to political power were their ties to Yuan Shih-k'ai. Between 1906 and 1911, Yuan helped nurtured Liang and his clique to control of the Ministry of Posts and Communications (Yu-ch'uan pu); during and after the revolution of 1911–12 Yuan depended on them and their communications and financial network of influence for support of his presidency of the Republic. Thus Liang and the Communications Clique represented the non-military side of Yuan Shih-k'ai's power during the late Ch'ing and early Republican periods.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , May 1970 , pp. 581 - 602
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 SSLNP, I, 1–19.Google Scholar

2 SSLNP, I, 12–42Google Scholar; biography of Li Tuan-fen in Ch'ing-shih [History of the Ch'ing], (Taipei: Kuo-fang yen-chiu yüan, 1961), 8 vols., VII, 5050.Google Scholar

3 Lien-che, Fang Tu, “Ching-chi t'e-k'o”Google Scholar (Special Examination on Political Economy), Chung-kuo hsien-tai shih tsung-pien (Selected Articles on Contemporary History of China), ed. Wu Hsiang-hsiang (Taipei, 1961), III, 1–44Google Scholar; SSLNP, I, 41–43. On the Su-pao affair see Wang, Y. C., “The Su-pao Case: A Study of Foreign Pressure, Intellectual Fermentation, and Dynastic Decline”, in Monumenta Serica, XXIV (1965), 84–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 SSLNP, I, 43–44.Google Scholar

5 SSLNP, I, 45–55Google Scholar. Teng Chih-ch'eng has insisted, without documentation, that Liang Shih-i was Yüan Shih-k'ai's most dependable contact with the Japanese—Teng Chih-ch'eng, “Review” of SSLNP, Yen-Ching hsüeh-pao (Yenching Journal Chinese Studies), no. 33 (1947), p. 294.Google Scholar

6 LCP, VII, 145.Google Scholar

7 LCP, VII, 171.Google Scholar

8 LCP, VIII, 863Google Scholar; XI, 3080.

9 SSLNP, I, 53–54Google Scholar; Feuerwerker, Albert, China's Early Industrialization (Cambridge, Mass., 1958), pp. 77–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 “Pu-yüan ta-ch'en nien-piao” [Tables of Chronological Succession of Presidents and Vice-Presidents in the Six Boards], Tables 9 and 10, Ch'ing-shih, IV, 2832–45Google Scholar; Ts'en Ch'un-hsüan, Lochai man-ch'i [Autobiographical Notes], (Taipei reprint, 1962).Google Scholar

11 LCP, I, 109, 111–14.Google Scholar

12 Sun, E-tu Zen, “The Pattern of Railway Development in China”, Far Eastern Quarterly, XIV (1954–1955), 179–99Google Scholar; figures on capital investment in Chia-ao, Chang, China's Struggle for Railroad Development (New York, 1943), pp. 23–46Google Scholar and Bell, H. T. and Woodhead, H. G. W. ed., China Yearbook, 1912 (London, 1912), pp. 163–92.Google Scholar

13 Sun, E-tu Zen, op. cit., p. 185Google Scholar and Chinese Railways and British Interests, 1898–1911 (New York, 1954).Google Scholar

14 The British controlled the Nanking-Shanghai and Taokouchen-Ch'inghua railways; see Sun, , Chinese Railways and British Interests, pp. 9, 39–60, 70–72Google Scholar and LCP, XIII, 4773–80, 4837Google Scholar. The French controlled the Chengting-Taiyuan and Kaifeng-Loyang railways; see China Yearbook, 1912, pp. 175–76Google Scholar and Chia-ao, Chang, op. cit., p. 28Google Scholar. A railway over which control was nominally with the ministry but actually lay in Chinese hands other than the ministry's was the Pinghsiang-Chuchow line. Chang Chih-tung and Sheng Hsuan-huai retained control of this railway through Pi Hungnien, who was their appointee as its managing director from 1903 to 1912; see Sun, , Chinese Railways and British InterestsGoogle Scholar, chapters III, IV and LCP, XI, 3474.

15 Tisler, R., “Le Chemin de Fer Pekin-Hankéou”, Questions Diplomatiques Et Coloniales, 1909, p. 39Google Scholar; LCP, VIII, 660–67Google Scholar; and Sun, , Chinese Railways and British Interests, p. 138Google Scholar. Sheng Hsuan-huai and T'ang Shao-i submitted the first memorial about redemption of the railway in Nov., 1905—Sheng Hsuan-huai, Yü-chai ts'un kao [Collected Papers of Sheng Hsuan-huai], (Wuchin, 1939), chüan 12: 10–12.Google Scholar

16 SSLNP, I, 74–78Google Scholar; LCP, VIII, 667.Google Scholar

17 SSLNP, I, 65–67.Google Scholar

18 YCPTI, I, 147–62Google Scholar; LCP, VIII, 668–70.Google Scholar

19 Frochisse, J. M., La Belique et la Chine: relations diplomatique et economique, 1839–1909 (Bruxelles, 1936), pp. 307–11Google Scholar and Tisler, R., op. cit., pp. 41–42.Google Scholar

20 LCP, VIII, 672–84Google Scholar and Sun, , Chinese Railways and British Interests, pp. 138–41Google Scholar. The banks were Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation and Banque de L'Indo-Chine.

21 Times (London), 12 16, 1908, p. 7 and 12 29, pp. 3–4Google Scholar and Sun, , Chinese Railways and British Interests, pp. 140–41.Google Scholar

22 LCP, VIII, 668–70.Google Scholar

23 LCP, VIII, 685–86.Google Scholar

24 As a money maker, the Peking-Hankow Railway matched the Peking-Mukden Railway—LCP, 3405–09.Google Scholar

25 Tung-fang tsa-chih (The Eastern Miscellany), Jan.-Feb., 1909Google Scholar (Hsuan-t'ung 1/1), “Ta shih-chi” [Important Events], pp. 3–4; Kuo-feng pao, vol. 1, no. 29, p. 85Google Scholar; Times (London), 12 1, 1908, p. 6 and 12 16, p. 7Google Scholar; Hsin-ch'eng, Chang, Chung-kuo hsien-tai chiao-t'ung shih (A History of Modern Communications in China), (Shanghai, 1931), p. 57.Google Scholar

26 Chinese Public Opinion (Peking), 01 14, 1909, p. 4Google Scholar; Bland, J. O. P. in Recent Events and Present Policies in China (London, 1912)Google Scholar frequently cited the patriotism of the Cantonese bureaucrats in the Ministry of Posts and Communications.

27 Hall, R. O., Chapters and Documents on Chinese National Banking (Shanghai, 1920), p. 19, 49Google Scholar. Discussion of the size and importance of the ministry's revenues is forthcoming.

28 North-China Herald, 05 1, 1908, p. 282Google Scholar; Yu-tso, Tan, Chung-kuo Chung-yao yin-hang fa-chan shih [History of the Development of Important Banks in China], (Taipei, 1961), pp, 227–30Google Scholar; and Hall, R. O., op. cit.Google Scholar, chapter V.

29 SSLNP, I, 78.Google Scholar

30 SSLNP, I, 80.Google Scholar

31 YCPTI, III, 1087–91.Google Scholar

32 YCPTI, I, 167, 207.Google Scholar

33 SSLNP, I, 73Google Scholar; YCPTI, I, 210–11.Google Scholar

34 SSLNP, I, 73.Google Scholar

35 SSLNP, I, 58, 68–69, 85Google Scholar; Shun-sheng, Tso, Chung-kuo hsien-tai ming-jen i-shih [Anecdotes About Famous Modern Chinese], (Hong Kong, 1959), p. 76.Google Scholar

36 This definition roughly follows Simon, Herbert A., Administrative behavior (New York, 1949)Google Scholar, Dep. 161 and Riggs, Fred W., Administration in Developing Countries (Boston, 1964), pp. 170–71, 275.Google Scholar

37 Tung-hua hsü-lu, Kuang-hsü [Continuation of the Tung-hua Records, Kuang-hsü Reign], (Shanghai, 1909)Google Scholar, chüan 207:14b-15b; Hsin-ch'eng, Chang, op. cit., p. 50Google Scholar; Brunnert, H. S. and Hagelstrom, V. V., Present Day Political Organization of China (Shanghai, 1912), pp. 157–60Google Scholar; LCP, I, 111–22Google Scholar. Department of General Affairs was abolished in 1909.

38 Hsuan-huai, Sheng, op. cit., chüan 16:22–23Google Scholar; revenue reports in YCPTI, III, 1241–55 and IV, 1363–74, 1409–23.Google Scholar

39 SSLNP, I, 85.Google Scholar

40 Yeh Chia-yen hsien-sheng nien p'u [Chronological Biography of Yeh Kung-ch'o], compiled by followers (men-sheng), (1936), pp. 1–14Google Scholar; Kung-ch'o, Yeh, Chia-yen hung-kao [Collected Papers of Yeh Kung-ch'o], (Nanking, 1930), pp. 67–80Google Scholar; LCP, VIII, 670, 686.Google Scholar

41 Who's Who in China, published by The China Weekly Review. (Shanghai, 1926), pp. 422–23Google Scholar; Yeh Chia-yen hsien-sheng nien p'u, pp. 9–14Google Scholar; YCPTI, I, 22, 337–40 and II, 675.Google Scholar

42 Yin-nan, Fan, Tang-tai chung-kuo ming-jen lu [Who's Who of Contemporary China], (Shanghai, 1931), pp. 449–50Google Scholar; SSLNP, I, 18, 22, 33Google Scholar; LCP, IX, 1569, 1622Google Scholar; YCPTI, I, 22.Google Scholar

43 Who's Who in China (1920 ed.), 278–79Google Scholar; SSLNP, I, 53Google Scholar; LCP, I, 115 and XII, 4607.Google Scholar

44 The one railway over which the clique accumulated little influence was the Tientsin-Pukou line. This railway, begun in 1907 on the initiative of Yüan Shih-k'ai and completed in 1911, was administered by the ministry but was separate jurisdictionally from the General Railway Bureau and Liang Shih-i. First Lü Hai-huan and then Hsü Shih-ch'ang, who both outranked Liang, directed the railway's construction as controller-general (tu-pan ch'en) of an Office for Railways (T'ieh-lu kung-so) which was administratively independent of the General Railway Bureau and dealt solely with the Tientsin-Pukou line. LCP, X, 2306, 2384Google Scholar and Sun, , Chinese Railways and British Interests, pp. 129–37.Google Scholar

45 LCP, VIII, 863, 868–69Google Scholar; YCPTI, III, 1091–92.Google Scholar

46 LCP, IX, 1569, 1622.Google Scholar

47 SSLNP, I, 80Google Scholar; Chia-ao, Chang, op. cit., p. 58Google Scholar; YCPTI, IV, 1683–93Google Scholar; LCP, XII, 4254Google Scholar; Who's Who in China (1925 ed.), pp. 264–65.Google Scholar

48 YCPTI, II, 431–32Google Scholar; LCP, VII, 83, 171–72Google Scholar; SSLNP, I, 80, 87–88.Google Scholar

49 Sun, , Chinese Railways and British Interests, p. 86Google Scholar; YCPTI, V, 1819Google Scholar; LCP, XII, 4607.Google Scholar

50 Shen Yün-lung, “Sheng Hsuan-huai Liang Shih-i chieh-yüan shih-mou” [From beginning to end (the story of) enmity between Sheng Hsuanhuai and Liang Shih-i], Hsien-tai cheng-chih jenwu shu-ping [Notes on modern political personalities], (Taipei, 1966), Part III, 91–104Google Scholar; SSLNP, I, 82–85Google Scholar; Cheng-chih kuan-pao, 02 8, 1909 (Hsüant'ung 1/1/18), pp. 17–20.Google Scholar

51 Yeh Chia-yen hsien-sheng nien p'u, pp. 10–14.Google Scholar

52 Ibid., p. 13; Cheng-chih kuan-pao, 02 8, 1909, p. 8Google Scholar; LCP, I, 116.Google Scholar

53 Hsuan-huai, Sheng, op. cit., chüan 16:22–23Google Scholar; LCP, I, 115.Google Scholar

54 SSLNP, I, 100Google Scholar; Tung-fang tsa-chih, 09–10 1911Google Scholar (Hsüan-t'ung 3/8), “Chih-kuan piao” [Table of office holders], p. 1.

55 LCP, I, 116Google Scholar; Yeh Chia-yen hsien-sheng nien p'u, p. 14.Google Scholar

56 YCPTI, V, 2151, 2179.Google Scholar

57 LCP, IX, 1622.Google Scholar

58 LCP, VII, 172.Google Scholar

59 Hsuan-huai, Sheng, op. cit., chüanGoogle Scholar 16:18a-b; YCPTI, I, 167–68, 207, 251–52, 363–64 and IV, 1299, 1323–27, 1349.Google Scholar

60 This is the conviction of Hall, R. O., op. cit.Google Scholar, especially chapter V.

61 YCPTI, IV, 1407–08.Google Scholar

62 Liang Shih-i's and the Communications Clique's Howrecord during the Republican period is documented and further developed in a later section of this article.

63 The authorized version of Yüan's career prior to the Republic is Shen Tsu-hsien and Wu K'ai-sheng, Jung-an ti-tzu chi [An Account of Yüan Shih-k'ai by his Disciples], (1913), 4 chüan. In it Chou Hsüeh-hsi and Yang Shih-ch'i are mentioned more frequently than Liang, reflecting their greater importance to Yüan in the earlier period. During Yiiüan's presidency of the Republic, however, Liang is generally considered to have wielded more political and bureaucratic power; see, for example, Ch'en, Jerome, Yüan Shih-k'ai, 1859–1916 (Stanford, 1961)Google Scholar, chapters VIII, IX, X. On Chou Hsüeh-hsi, see Howrecord ard Boorman, L., ed., Biographical Dictionary Republican China (New York, 1967-), 5 volsGoogle Scholar. jected, II, 409–13.

64 Ju-lin, Ts'ao, I-sheng chih hui-i [Memoirs of life], (Hong Kong, 1966), pp. 76–77Google Scholar and Chia-ao, Chang, “Chang Chia-ao material,” (Typescript, Columbia U., 1958)Google Scholar, chapter IX. Biographical sketches of Liang Shih-i by men who knew him convey same impression; see Shih-i, Chia, Min-kuo ch'u nien ti chi-jen ts'ai-cheng tsung-chang [Early Republican Finance Ministers], (Taipei, 1967), pp. 40Google Scholar; Shun-sheng, Tso, op. cit., pp. 73–80Google Scholar; and Reinsch, Paul, An American Diplomat in China (New York, 1922), pp. 95–96.Google Scholar

65 This is calculated from the estimates of revenue for the 1911 budget, which was the only bud- Hsuanget drafted by the central government after 1891; see Morrison, Esther, “The Modernization of the Confucian Bureaucracy: An Historical Study of Public Administration” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Radcliffe College, 1959), Figures 33, 34, p. 1206.Google Scholar

66 Cheng-chih kuan-pao, 02 8, 1909, p. 18.Google Scholar

67 Times (London), 02 8, 1909, p. 5.Google Scholar

68 Tung-fang tsa-chih, Feb.-Mar. 1909Google Scholar (Hsüant'ung 1/2), “Ta shih-chi,” pp. 78–79.Google Scholar

69 Chinese Public Opinion (Peking), 02 13, 1909, p. 4 and 02 16, 1909, p. 7.Google Scholar

70 Cheng-chih kuan-pao, 02 8, 1909, pp. 7–20.Google Scholar

71 Ibid., pp. 9–10.

72 Exchange rate in North-China Herald, 02 23, 1909, p. 330.Google Scholar

73 Cheng-chih kuan-pao, 02 8, 1909, pp. 7–8.Google Scholar

74 Tung-fang tsa-chih, 03, 1911 (Hsüan-t'ung 3/2), p. 16.Google Scholar

75 LCP, XII, 4613.Google Scholar

76 Yeh Chia-ycn hsien-sheng nien p'u, p. 11.Google Scholar

77 YCPTI, IV, 1323–27, 1725–26. 1743–53.Google Scholar

78 Hall, R. O., op. cit., p. 46Google Scholar, has illustrated this point with a discussion of the reliability of the accounts of the ministry's Bank of Communications; annual revenue reports arc cited in note 38.

79 Feuerwerker, Albert, op cit.Google Scholar

80 The bank did speculate briefly in rubber plantations in Southeast Asia—Hall, R. O., op. cit., p. 47.Google Scholar

81 SSLNP, I, 91.Google Scholar

82 Neither in Yeh Chia-yen hsien-sheng nien p'u nor Yeh's Chia-yen hung-kao is there mention of investment in private enterprises.

83 On the relationship of Sheng's business interests in the Canton-Hankow railway complex and the Hanyang Ironworks to his railway nationalization policies, see Hatano Yoshihiro, “Shinmatsu okeru tetsudō kokyū seisaku no haikei” [The Back-ground of the Railway Nationalization Policy at the End of the Ch'ing Period], Nagoya daigaku ronshu, XVII (1957), pp. 29–66.Google Scholar

84 SSLNP, I, 103, 113.Google Scholar

85 YCPTI, V, 2241.Google Scholar

86 LCP, VII, 172 and VIII, 864.Google Scholar

87 LCP, X, 2387.Google Scholar

88 LCP, XII, 4283.Google Scholar

89 Hall, R. O., op. cit., p. 48Google Scholar; SSLNP, I, 120Google Scholar; Yeh Chia-yen hsien-sheng nien p'u, p. 19.Google Scholar

90 Bland, J. O. P., op. cit.Google Scholar

91 Far Eastern Review, 04 1912Google Scholar, “The Financial History of the Revolution”.

92 SSLNP, I, 100.Google Scholar

93 SSLNP, I, 100–14Google Scholar; Yeh Chia-yen hsien-sheng nien p'u, pp. 15–19.Google Scholar

94 SSLNP, I, 147Google Scholar; Yeh Chia-yen hsien-sheng nien p'u, p. 20.Google Scholar

95 SSLNP, I, 114, 186–90Google Scholar; Shih-i, Chia, op. cit., p. 33.Google Scholar

96 Chien-nung, Li, The Political History of China, ed. and trans. Teng, Ssu-yu and Ingalls, Jeremy (Princeton, 1956), p. 299Google Scholar and Yüan-yung, Huang, Yüan-sheng i-chu (Posthumous Works of Huang Yuan-sheng), (Shanghai, 1920), II, 233.Google Scholar

97 SSLNP, I, 137–53Google Scholar; Hall, R. O., op. cit., p. 49.Google Scholar

98 SSLNP, I, 168–281Google Scholar; Hall, R. O., op. cit., pp. 59–64Google Scholar; Ch'en, Jerome, op. cit.Google Scholar, chaps. IX, X.

99 In SSLNP, I, 267–71Google Scholar are a number of Chinese newspaper reports about the scandals; see also analysis in North-China Herald, Feb. 19, 1916, pp. 435–37. The attack on Liang Shih-i and the Communications Clique was related to attacks on the power of two other of Yüan's principal deputies, Tuan Ch'i-jui and Hsiung Hsi-ling. The antagonists included Yang Shih-ch'i, Chou Hsüch-hsi, and Yüan K'o-ting (Yüan Shih-k'ai's eldest son). For a summary of the entire affair, see Tao-lin, Hsü, Hsü Shu-cheng wen-chi nien p'u ho-pien [Collected Writings and Chronological Biography of Hsü Shu-cheng], (Taipei, 1962), pp. 162–72Google Scholar. In the fall of 1915, when Yüan's son and others organized the movement to revive the monarchy with Yüan as emperor, Liang's name headed the signatories of the petition to Yuan. But the fact that Liang had been under attack and his power seriously undermined since June 1915, may support the contention of Liang's biographers that he played a minor part in the monarchical movement—Pai Chiao, Yüan Shih-k'ai yü Chung-hua min-kuo [Yüan Shih-k'ai and the Chinese Republic], (Shanghai, 1936), pp. 255–56Google Scholar and SSLNP, I, 271–72, 276–80.Google Scholar

100 Hall, R. O., op. cit.Google Scholar, chapters V, VI, VII.

101 SSLNP, I, 225Google Scholar and Tse-tung, Chow, The May Fourth Movement (Cambridge, Mass., 1960), p. 103.Google Scholar