Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:00:50.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Charles F. Keyes
Get access

Abstract

This introduction considers the issues raised in the debate, recently joined in the works of James Scott and Samuel Popkin and explored in the papers in this symposium, regarding the relative salience of moral and rational economic approaches to the study of the adaptation of peasantries to worlds transformed by their incorporation into modern states and into a global economy. The author offers a refiguration of theoretical assumptions, arguing that, in order to understand the variations in modes of adaptation that have been described in the symposium, it is necessary to assume that the constraints on the worlds of peasants generated by political-economic changes are made meaningful for social action not only in terms of instrumental rationality, but also with reference to culturally distinctive moral premises.

Type
Articles: Peasant Strategies in Asian Societies: Moral and Rational Economic Approaches—A Symposium
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , August 1983 , pp. 753 - 768
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Adas, Michael. 1981. “From Avoidance to Confrontation: Peasant Protest in Precolonial and Colonial Southeast Asia.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 23, no. 2: 217–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Christopher. 1981. “Economic Reorganization and the Slump in South and Southeast Asia.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 23, no. 3: 325–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeke, J. H. 1966. “Village Reconstruction.” In Indonesian Economics: The Concept of Dualism in Theory and Practice, pp. 301–16. The Hague: W van Hoeve.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. trans, by Nice, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condominas, Georges. 1980. L'Espace social: A propos de l'Asie du Sud-est. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Cumings, Bruce. 1981. “Interest and Ideology in the Study of Agrarian Politics.” Politics and Society 10, no. 4: 467–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Kingsley. 1962. “The Role of Class Mobility in Economic Development.” Population Review 6, no. 2: 67–73.Google Scholar
Furnivall, J. S. 1939. Netherlands India: A Study of Plural Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Furnivall, J. S. 1956. Colonial Policy and Practice. 2nd ed. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. 1963. Primitive Rebels: Studies in Archaic Forms of Social Movement in the 19th and 20th Centuries. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. 1969. Bandits. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J., and George, Rudé. 1968. Captain Swing: A Social History of the Great Agricultural Uprising of 1830. New York: W W. Norton.Google Scholar
Indonesian Economics: The Concept of Dualism in Theory and Practice. 1966. The Hague: W van Hoeve.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1977. “Millennialism, Theravāda Buddhism, and Thai Society.” Journal of Asian Studies 36, no. 2: 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1979. “Ethnography and Anthropological Interpretation in the Study of Thailand.” In The Study of Thailand, ed. by Ayal, Eliezer, pp. 1–60. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Center for International Studies, Southeast Asia Program.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1981. “The Dialectics of Ethnic Change.” In Ethnic Change, ed. by Keyes, , pp. 4–30. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. Forthcoming. “The Proposed World of the School: Thai Villagers’ Entry into a Bureaucratic State System.” Paper prepared for conference on Cultural Change and Rural Education in Southeast Asia, sponsored by the Joint Committee on Southeast Asia of the Social Science Research Council and the American Council of Learned Societies, to be held in Penang, Malaysia, July 1983.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F., and Daniel, E. Valentine, eds. 1983. Karma: An Anthropological Inquiry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lieberson, Jonathan. 1981a. Peasant Values and Rural Development: An Unresolved Controversy. New York: Center for Policy Studies, Population Council, Working Papers, no. 73.Google Scholar
Lieberson, Jonathan. 1981b. “The Silent Majority.” New York Review of Books, October 22, pp. 34–37.Google Scholar
Migdal, Joel. 1974. Peasants, Politics and Revolution: Pressures toward Political and Social Change in the Third World. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington Jr., 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington Jr., 1978. Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. White Plains, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paige, Jeffrey M. 1975. Agrarian Revolution: Social Movements and Export Agriculture in the Underdeveloped World. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. New York: Rinehart and Co. (Reprinted, Boston: Beacon, 1957.)Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl, Arensberg, Conrad M., and Pearson, Harry W., eds. 1957. Trade and Market in the Early Empire. Glencoe: Free Press. (Reprinted, Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1971.)Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel I. 1979. The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfield, Robert. 1956. Peasant Society and Culture: An Anthropological Approach to Civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Redfield, Robert. 1960. The Little Community and Peasant Society and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Roumasset, James A. 1976. Rice and Risk: Decision Making among Low-Income Farmers. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Sarkisyanz, E. 1965. Buddhist Backgrounds of the Burmese Revolution. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. 1976. The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, G. William. 1971. “Chinese Peasants and the Closed Community: An Open and Shut Case.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 13: 270–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, E. R. 1971. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century.” Past and Present 50: 76–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. ed. by Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. 1957. “Closed Corporate Communities in Meso-America and Java.” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 13: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. 1966a. “Kinship, Friendship, and Patron-Client Relations in Complex Societies.” In The Social Anthropology of Complex Societies, ed. by Banton, Michael, pp. 1–22. London: Tavistock Publications, Association of Social Anthropologists Monographs.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. 1966b. Peasants. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. 1969. Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. 1971. “Peasant Rebellion and Revolution.” In National Liberation: Revolution in the Third World, ed. by Miller, Norman and Roderick, Aya, pp. 48–67. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar