Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:06:20.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In defense of Sinicization: A Rebuttal of Evelyn Rawski's “Reenvisioning the Qing”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2010

Ping-Ti Ho
Get access

Extract

In her recent presidential address, “Reenvisioning the Qing,” Professor Evelyn Sakakida Rawski attacks the “sinicization” theme originally presented as one of the five major aspects of my 1967 article, “The Significance of the Ch'ing Period in Chinese History” (Ho 1967). In her essay—frankly admitted to have been based exclusively on “recent secondary literature”—she states that “a notable outcome of the new scholarship is the rejection of the sinicization thesis and its Han-centered orientation in favor of an empire-building model that emphasizes the importance of the Chinese empire's cultural links with the non-Han peoples of Inner Asia” (Rawski 1996, 827). It ought to be pointed out at the outset that my 1967 paper was not delivered, as she mistakenly presumed, from the podium of the president of the Association for Asian Studies; for I did not receive this honor until 1975–76, when, after having shifted my research interest so far away from the Ming-Ch'ing period, I addressed the Association with a paper entitled “The Chinese Civilization: A Search for the Roots of its Longevity.” The 1967 paper was an AAS panel presentation, not a presidential address.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 123 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Bartlett, Beatrice S. 1985. “Books of Revelations: The Importance of the Manchu Language Archival Record Books for Research on Ch'ing History.” Late Imperial China 6.2:25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, Beatrice S. 1991. Monarchs and Ministers: The Grand Council in Mid-Ch'ing China, 1723–1820Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ch'en shu 1987. “” In Liao-Chin-shih lun-chi Edited by Ch'en Shu. Shanghai: Ku-chi.Google Scholar
Ch'en Yin-K'o, 1952. “. ” Reprinted in Ch'en Yin-k'o hsien-sheng ch'iian-chi , 2 vols., Taipei: Chiu-ssu, 1977.Google Scholar
Ch'en Yin-K'o, 1942. T'ang-tai cheng-chih-shih shu-lun-kao Reprinted in Ch'en Yin-k'o hsin-sheng ch'iian-chi, 2 vols., Taipei: Chiu-ssu, 1977.Google Scholar
yuan, Ch'en 1935. Yuan Hsi-yü-jen hua-hua k'ao Taipei: Shihchieh, Reprint.Google Scholar
yuan, Ch'en. 1966. Western and Central Asians in China under the Mongols: Their Transformation into Chinese. Translated by Hsing-hai, Ch'ien and Carrington Goodrich, L.. Monumenta Serica Monograph no. 15. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pao-Hsiang, Chin. 1958. “” Reprinted in Hsi-Hsia-shih lun-wen-chi , edited by Pin, PaiNinghsia: Ninghsiajen-min, 1984.Google Scholar
Chin-Shu Beijing: Chung-hua.Google Scholar
CHUN-KE-ER SHIH-LÜEH 1985. Beijing: Jen-min.Google Scholar
Crossley, Pamela K. 1990. “Thinking about Ethnicity in Early Modern China.” Late Imperial China 1:1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, Pamela K. and Rawski, Evelyn S.. 1993. “A Profile of the Manchu Language in Ch'ing History.”; Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 53.1:63–102.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, C. P. 1935. China: A Short Cultural History. Paperback edition, New York: Praeger, 1961.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Joseph. 1978. “Ch'ing Inner Asia τ. 1800,” and “The Heyday of the Ch'ing Order in Mongolia, Sinkiang and Tibet.” In The Cambridge History of China, v. 10: Late Ch'ing, 1800–1911, Part I. Edited by Fairbank, John K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herbert, Franke. 1978. From Tribal Chieftain to Universal Emperor and God: The Legitimization of the Yuan Dynasty. Munich: Verlag der Baerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Herbert, Franke and Twitchett, Denis, eds. 1994. The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 6, Alien Regimes and Border States, 907–1368. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fu, Lo-Ch'eng 1992. “,” in T'ang-tai yen-chin lun-chi . Vol. I. Taipei: Hsin-wen-i.Google Scholar
Gernet, Jacques. 1982. A History of Chinese Civilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gladney, Dru C. 1996. Muslim Chinese: Ethnic Nationalism in the People's Republic. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Han, Ru-Lin ed. 1986. Yuan-ch'ao shih 2 vols. Beijing: Jen-min.Google Scholar
Han-Shu Beijing: Chung-hua.Google Scholar
Thomas, Heberer. 1989. China and Its National Minorities: Autonomy or Assimilation? London: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Ho, Ping-Ti. 1955. “The Introduction of American Food Plants into China” The American Anthropologist. 57.2: 191–201.Google Scholar
Ho, Ping-Ti 1956. “Early-Ripening Rice in Chinese History.“ Economic History Review. 2d series, 9.2: 200–18.Google Scholar
Ho, Ping-Ti 1959. Studies on the Population of China, 1368–1953. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ho, Ping-Ti. 1967. “The Significance of the Ch'ing Period in Chinese History.” The Journal of Asian Studies 26.2: 189–195Google Scholar
Ho, Ping-Ti. 1968. “Salient Aspects of China's Heritage.” In China in Crisis I: China's Heritage and the Communist Political System. Edited by Ho, Ping-ti and Tsou, Tang. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ho, Ping-Ti. 1970. “An Estimate of The Total Population of Sung-Chin China.” In Etudes Song in Memoriam Etienne Balazs. l” series, 1, ed. Francoise Aubin. Paris: Mouton and Ecole pratique des hautes études.Google Scholar
Ho, Ping-Ti. 1975 The Cradle of the East: An Inquiry into the Indigenous Origins of Techniques and Ideas of Neolithic and Early Historic China, 5000–1000 B.C. Hong Kong and Chicago: The Chinese University of Hong Kong and The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ho, Ping-Ti. 1976. “The Chinese Civilization: A Search for the Roots of its Longevity.” The Journal of Asian Studies. 35.4: 547–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, Ping-Ti. 1978. “” , .Google Scholar
Ho, Ping-Ti 1996. “,” , Feb. and April, No. 33–34.Google Scholar
Hsu, C. Y. 1980. “Late Ch'ing Foreign Relations, 1866–1905.” In The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 11: Late Ch'ing, 1800–1911, Part II. Edited by Fairbank, John K. and Liu, Kwang ching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hummel, Arthur W. ed. 1943. Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing Period. 2 vols. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Qlcong, Jin. 1995. “Jurchen Literature under the Chin.” In China Under Jurchen Rule: Essays on Chin Intellectual and Cultural History. Edited by Tillman, H. C. and West, S. H.. Albany: The State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M. 1986. The Later Roman Empire, 284–602: A Social, Economic and Administrative Survey. 2 vols. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lau, D. C. tr. 1992. Confucius: The Analects (Lun Yu). Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
Legge, James, tr. 1982. The Works of Mencius in The Chinese Classics, vols. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
Lei, HAI-TSUNG. 1940. Chung-kuo-wen-hua yu Chung-kuo ti ping Ch'ang-sha: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Kan 1983. “” In Meng-ku-shih lun-wen bsuan-chi 5th series. Huhehot: Nei-meng ku jen-min ch'u-pan-she.Google Scholar
Lin, Kan. 1988. Tu-ch'ueh shih Huhehot: Nei-meng ku jen-min ch'u-pan-she.Google Scholar
Liu, Kwang-Ching 1980. “The Military Challenge: The North-west and the Coast.” In The Cambridge History of China. Vol. 11, Late Ch'ing, 1800–1911, Part II. Edited by Fairbank, John K. and , Kwang-Ching Liu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lo, Hsiang-Lin 1959. P'u Shou-keng yen-chiu Hong Kong: Chung-kuo hsiieh she.Google Scholar
Lo, Hsiang-Lin. 1966. T'ang-Yuan erh-tai chih ching-chiao Hong Kong: Chung-kuo hsüeh she.Google Scholar
Ma, CH'ANG-SHOU 1962A. Pei-Ti yu Hsiung-nu Beijing: San-lien.Google Scholar
Ma, CH'ANG-SHOU. 1962B. Wu-huanyu Hsien-pei Shanghai: Jen-min.Google Scholar
Colin, Mackerras. 1994. China's Minorities: Integration and Modernization in the Twentieth Century. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Colin, Mackerras. 1995. China's Minority Cultures: Identities and Integration since 1912. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Meng, Shen. 1935. “” In . Shanghai: Shang-wu.Google Scholar
MENG, SSU-MING 1967. Yuan-tai she-hui chieh-chi chih-tu Hong Kong: Lung-men.Google Scholar
CHIEH FU-Ll, MlNG-LÜ 1908 ed.Google Scholar
HSIU, OU-YANGIn Google Scholar
LUCIANO, PETECH. 1973. Aristocracy and Government in Tibet, 1728–1959. Rome: Istituto Italiano per II Medio ed Estreno Oriente.Google Scholar
PULLEYBLANK, EDWIN G. 1976. “The An Lu-shan Rebellion and the Origins of Chronic Militarism in Late T'ang China”In Essays on T'ang society. Edited by Perry, John C. and Smith, Bardwell L.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
PUMPELLY, RAPHAEL, ed. 1908. Explorations in Turkestan: Prehistoric Civilizations of Anau. 2 vols. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
RACHEWILTZ, IGOR DE. 1983. “Turks in China under the Mongols” In China Among Equals. Edited by Rossabi, Morris. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rawski, Evelyn s. 1996. “Reenvisioning the Qing: The Significance of the Qing Period in Chinese History.“The Journal of Asian Studies 55.4:829–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Rossabi 1988. Khubilai Khan: His Life and Times. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Henry, Serruys. 1955. The Mongols of Kansu During the Ming. Extrait des Melanges Chinois et Bouddhiques, L'Institut Beige des Hautes Etudes Chinoises, X. Bruges: Imprimerie Sainte-Catherine.Google Scholar
Henry, Serruys. 1955 The Mongals in China during the Hung-Wu Period(1368–1398). Extrait des Melanges Chinois et Bouddiques, L'Institut Beige des Hautes Etudes Chinoises, XI. Bruges: Imprimerie Sainte-Catherine.Google Scholar
Kuang, Ssu-maTzu-chih t'ung-chien Taipei: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Wen-chi, T'ang and Ch'ing-ssu, Lo 1996. Ch'ien-lung chuan Taipei: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Chin-sheng, T'ao 1971. Pien-chiang-shih yen-chiu chi Taipei: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Shao-chen, T'eng 1995. Nurhaci p'ing-chuan Shen-yang: Liaoning jen-min.Google Scholar
Yu, TuT'ung-tien The Commercial Press ed.Google Scholar
Chung-han, Wang 1990. “” Ch'ing-shih hsin-k'ao Liao-ning ta-hsüeh.Google Scholar
Chung-han, Wang 1993. Ch'ing-shih hsu-k'ao. Taipei: Hua-shih.Google Scholar
Wei-shu, Beijing: Chung-hua.Google Scholar
Weschler, Howard j. 1979. “T'ai-tsung (reign 626–49) the Consolidator.” In The Cambridge History of China, vol. 3: Sui and T'ang China. Edited by Twitchett, Denis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Arthur t. 1968. “Comments on Ho Paper.” In China in Crisis, vol. I: China's Heritage and The Communist Political System. Edited by Ho, Ping-ti and Tsou, Tang. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 39.Google Scholar
Yao, Wei-yuan 1962. Pei-ch'ao hu-hsing k'ao Beijing: Chung-hua.Google Scholar
Baikequanshu, Zhongguo da 1986. Kaoguxue . 1987. Minzu . 1988. Zongjiao .Google Scholar
Eric, Zurcher. 1959. The Buddhist Conquest of China: The Spread and Adaptation of Buddhism in Early Medieval China. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar