Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:31:39.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From “Feudalism” to “Capitalism” in Recent Historical Writing from Mainland China

Review products

Chung-kuo tzu-pen chu-i meng-ya wen-t'i t'ao-lun chi [Collected Papers on the Problem of the Incipiency of Capitalism in China]. Edited by the Chinese History Seminar of the Chinese People's University. Peking: San-lien shu-tien, 1957. 2 vols., 8 + 1102pp.
Ming-Ch'ing she-hui ching-chi hsing-t'ai ti yen-chiu [Studies in the Society and Economy of the Ming and Ch'ing Periods]. Edited by the Chinese History Seminar of the Chinese People's University. Shanghai: Shanghai jen-min ch'u-pan-she, 1957. 7 + 357pp.
Ming-Ch'ing-shih lun-ts'ung [Collected Essays on Ming and Ch'ing History]. Edited by Kuang-piLi. Wuhan: Hupei jen-min ch'u-pan-she, 1957. 294pp.

Part of: MGH-JAS CAPITALISM COLLECTION-MARCH 2021 HEG-JAS CAPITALISM COLLECTIO-MARCH 2021

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Albert Feuerwerker
Albert Feuerwerker
Affiliation:
Center for East Asian Studies, Harvard University
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , November 1958 , pp. 107 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “The Chinese Revolution and the Chinese Communist Party,” in Selected Worlds of Mao Tse-tung (London, 1954), III, 77.Google Scholar

2 The transition from slavery to feudalism presents a similar problem to Chinese historians who are now writing at length on this subject as well. See Li-shih yen-chiu pien-chi-pu [The Editors of Historical Studies], compilers, Chung-kuo ti nu-li-chih yü feng-chien-chih fen-ch'i wen-ti lun-wen hsüan-chi [Collected Articles on the Problem of the Division Between the Period of Slavery and That of Feudalism in China](Peking, 1957).

3 Perhaps the concern with the feudalism-capitalism transformation is also a delayed reaction to the recent discussions among English-speaking and Japanese Marxists occasioned by Dobb's, MauriceStudies in the Development of Capitalism (London, 1947Google Scholar). See The Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism: a Symposium by Sweezy, Paul M. [and others](New York: Science and Society, 1954Google Scholar).

4 E. A. Kracke, Jr., “Sung Society: Change Within Tradition,” FEQ, XIV (August 1955), 479–488.

5 See Professor Naitō's posthumous work Chügoku kinsei shi [History of Modern China](Tokyo, 1947Google Scholar).

6 Schurmann, Herbert Franz, Economic Structure of the Yuan Dynasty (Cambridge, Mass., 1956)Google Scholar, vii, 4–5, 8–9, and passim.

7 See M. Postan, “Medieval Capitalism,” Economic History Review, ist Ser., IV (1932-34), 212-227.

8 H. R. Schubert, History of the British Iron and Steel Industry from c. 450 B.C. to A.D. 177$ (London, 1957), 244, 334, and Appendix IV, “Output Figures.”

9 Yen Chung-p'ing, Ch'ing-tai Yün-nan t'ung-cheng k'ao [A Study of the Copper Industry in Yunnan During the Ch'ing Dynasty](Peking, 1957).

10 See P'eng Tse-i, comp., Chung-kuo chin-tai shou-kung-yeh shih tzu-liao (1840-1949) [Source Materials on Handicraft Industry in Modern China (1S40-1949)](Peking, 1957), 4 vols.; and Li Wenchihm, comp., Chung fato chin-tai nung-yeh shih tzu-liao, 1840-1911 [Source Materials on Agriculture in Modern China, 1840—1911](Peking, 1957)—there are two additional volumes in this collection, complied by two other scholars and dealing respectively with the periods 1912—27 and 1927—37.

11 See Lien-sheng Yang, “Numbers and Units in Chinese Economic History,” HJAS, XII (June 1949), 216-225.