Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:59:49.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exploring the Asian Economic Miracle: Politics, Economics, Society, Culture, and History — A Review Article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2010

Get access

Extract

Structural upgrading and industrial dynamism in Pacific Asia—initially Japan, then the Asian NIEs (Newly Industrializing Economies: South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore) following closely behind, and most recently, ASEAN 4 (Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines)—have been unprecedentedly phenomenal. This regional supergrowth in industrial activities has become the center of attention, but the evolving changes in the political systems and societal structures of the Pacific Asian nations have been, no doubt, equally important, although rather subtle and not so dramatic in appearance.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Alam, M. Shahid. 1989. Governments and Markets in Economic Development Strategies: Lessons from Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Bell, John Fred. 1953 A History of Economic Thought. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1992. “The Institutional Structure of Production.” American Economic Review 82.4 (September):713–19.Google Scholar
Deyo, Frederic C., ed. 1987. The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi, and Okimoto, Daniel I., eds. 1988. The Political Economy of Japan: Vol. 2, The Changing International Context. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers. 1982. MITl and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumon, Shumpei, and Henry, Rosovsky, eds. 1992. The Political Economy of Japan: Vol. 3, Cultural and Social Dynamics. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Okimoto, Daniel I. 1989. Between MITl and the Market: Japanese Industrial Policy for High Technology. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ozawa, Terutomo. 1993. “Video Review: The Pacific Century: An Introduction to Modern Asia.” Journal of Asian Studies 52.2 (May):512–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, Lucian W., (with Mary W. Pye). 1985. Asian Power and Politics: The Cultural Dimensions of Authority. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, Lucian W., and Sidney, Verba. 1965. Political Culture and Political Development. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Routledge. Reproduction, New York: E. P. Dutton, 1908.Google Scholar
Steuart, James. 1767. An Inquiry into the Principles of Political Economy. London. Reproduction, New York: Augustus M. Kelly, 1968.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WORLD BANK. 1993. The East Asian Miracle. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Yamamura, Kozo and Yasukichi, Yasuba, eds. 1987. The Political Economy of Japan: Vol. 1, The Domestic Transformation. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar