Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:55:16.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correspondence: On a Comparative Sociology of India: A Reply to Marriott

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Steve Barnett ,
Lina M. Fruzzetti  and
Ákos Östör
Steve Barnett
Affiliation:
Providence, Rhode Island
Lina M. Fruzzetti
Affiliation:
Providence, Rhode Island
Ákos Östör
Affiliation:
Providence, Rhode Island

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , May 1977 , pp. 599 - 601
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1977

References

1 Steve Barnett, Lina Fruzzetti, and Ákos Östör, “Hierarchy Purified: Notes on Dumont and His Critics,” JAS, XXXV, 4 (1976), pp. 627–46; McKim Marriott, “Interpreting Indian Society: A Monistic Alternative to Dumont's Dualism,” JAS, XXXVI, 1 (1976), pp. 189–95.

2 Louis Dumont, “The Conception of Kingship in Ancient India,” Contributions to Indian Sociology, 6 (1962), pp. 48–77.

3 Wagner, Roy, The Invention of Culture (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1975).Google Scholar