Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:31:49.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communist Ethics and Chinese Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

David S. Nivison
Get access

Extract

This paper is an analysis of certain aspects of recent Communist thought in China. By “recent” thought is meant that of the last two decades, and in fact this study is concerned essentially with developments from 1937 to 1949. The study is not based on an appraisal of the whole body of Chinese Communist writing in this period, nor even on a representative selection of it, but it does bring together for analysis some very interesting examples of Chinese Communist treatment of problems germane to the Confucian ethical tradition. The analysis thus, perhaps, indicates ways in which the Peking regime in the future may relate its ideology to the great corpus of traditional Chinese thought. My assumption has been that writers of the new regime, at least some of them, show a tendency, in developing the new thought, to incorporate into it, and synthesize with it wherever possible, native Chinese intellectual traditions and doctrines. This traditional intellectual background is often of extraordinary antiquity; but while writers such as Liu Shao-ch'i quote the words of Confucius because this has been the idiom of Chinese philosophy, there has nonetheless been a sophisticated effort to mesh a new Communist ethic with those aspects of Confucian thought which are especially characteristic of the last three or four centuries, and to present Communism as in effect the latest stage of this thought. This has been done deliberately and as part of a well-understood world-wide tactic in Communism to strike local roots and to fit Communist “theory” to national situations.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , November 1956 , pp. 51 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This situation has been well discussed in Compton, Boyd, Mao's China: Party Reform Documents, 1942–44 (Seattle, 1952), pp. xv–lii.Google Scholar

In this article, the following abbreviations are used: SCT for Studies in Chinese Thought, ed. Wright, Arthur F. (Chicago, 1953)Google Scholar; JTK for Jen-hsing tang-hsing ko-hsing [Human Nature, Party Nature, Individual Nature], by Ch'en Po-ta et al. (Ch'ao-hsi she, 1947)Google Scholar; LTKJ for Lun tang yü ko-jen [On the Party and the Individual], by Ch'en Po-ta et al. (Hongkong reprint, 1948)Google Scholar; SHCN for Ssu-hsiang chih-nan [A Guide to Thought], by Mao Tse-tung, Liu Shao-ch'i et al. (Hongkong: Pei-fang Press, 1949).Google Scholar

2 Compton, , p. xxxix.Google Scholar

3 See n. 55.

4 Compton, , pp. 260–261Google Scholar, in Liu's essay, “The Liquidation of Menshevik Thought in the Party.” See also Shao-ch'i, Liu, How to Be a Good Communist (Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1951), pp. 18–21Google Scholar. (The book is translated from a 1949 edition of Liu's Lun kung-ch'an tang-yüan ti hsiu-yang, consisting of “a series of lectures delivered by Liu Shao-ch'i in July 1939, at the Institute of Marxism-Leninism in Yenan”.)

5 Compton, , p. 266.Google Scholar

6 How to Be a Good Communist, pp. 45–46.Google Scholar

7 Li-sen, Chao, “How to Comprehend and Utilize Criticism and Self-Criticism,” Chinese Press Survey, X, No. 4 (06 1, 1950), pp. 96–98Google Scholar (translating from Kuan-ch'a, 6.14).

8 Compton, , p. xlv.Google Scholar

9 Tse-tung, Mao, China's New Democracy, 3rd ed. (Bombay: People's Publishing House, 1950), pp. 40–41Google Scholar (a trans, of Mao's Hsin min-chu-chu-i lun).

10 For a fuller analysis of this development in Chinese thought, see my article, “The Problem of ‘Knowledge’ and ‘Action’ in Chinese Thought since Wang Yang-ming,” SCT, pp. 112–145.Google Scholar

11 Ssu-yü, Teng and Fairbank, John K., China's Response to the West, a Documentary Survey, 1839–1923 (Cambridge, Mass., 1954), p. 265.Google Scholar

12 JTK, p. 7.Google Scholar

13 How to Be a Good Communist, pp. 6, 8, 12, 23–24.Google Scholar

14 Ibid, pp. 12–13.

15 Cf. Wright, Arthur F., “The Chinese Language and Foreign Ideas,” SCT, p. 300.Google Scholar

16 How to Be a Good Communist, pp. 3–4.Google Scholar

17 Ibid, pp. 15–16.

18 Sang, Ch'en, “Tang-hsing yü ssu sheng-huo” [“Party Nature and Private Life”], LTKJ, p. 3.Google Scholar

19 For a study of the importance of the notion of consciousness in recent Soviet psychology and education theory, see Bauer, Raymond A., The New Man In Soviet Psychology (Cambridge, Mass., 1952), especially pp. 132–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Henke, Frederick G., The Philosophy of Wang Yang-ming (London and Chicago, 1916), p. 242.Google Scholar

21 Henke, , p. 474.Google Scholar

22 Henke, , pp. 476–477.Google Scholar

23 Compton, , p. 146.Google Scholar

24 Shao-ch'i, Liu, Lun kung-ch'an tang-yüan ti hsiu-yang (Hongkong: The New Democracy Press, 1949), pp. 30–32Google Scholar (for this and following material, see also Compton, , pp. 108–113Google Scholar, and How to Be a Good Communist, pp. 51–57).Google Scholar

25 de Bary, W. Theodore, “A Reappraisal of Neo-Confucianism,” in SCT, p. 93.Google Scholar

26 Lun kung-ch'an tang-yüan ti hsiu-yang, pp. 32–33.Google Scholar

27 Compton, , p. 20.Google Scholar

28 Compton, , p. 30.Google Scholar

29 P'ing, Ch'en, “Tang-feng pu-liang ti piao-hsien” [“Manifestations of Bad Tendencies in the Party”], LTKJ, p. 69.Google Scholar

30 Lung-ch'ien (presumably a pen name), “Tsung-p'ai-chu-i yü chu-kuan-chu-i ti lienhsi” [“The Relation between Sectarianism and Subjectivism”], LTKJ, p. 72Google Scholar; also Compton, , p. 24.Google Scholar

31 Compton, , p. 24.Google Scholar

32 SCT, p. 139.Google Scholar

33 Compton, , p. 33.Google Scholar

34 Kan-chih, Ho, “Hsin pa-ku ti shih-chung” [“An Account of the New Formalism”], JTK, p. 53.Google Scholar

35 Ibid, p. 56.

36 Compton, , p. 39.Google Scholar

37 Brandt, Conrad, Schwartz, Benjamin, and Fairbank, John K., A Documentary History of Chinese Communism (Cambridge, Mass., 1952), p. 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

38 Ti-hsin (this pen name means, literally, “washed and made new”), “Fan chiao-t'iaochu-i chung chi-chung pu-cheng-ch'üeh ti ch'ing-hsiang” [“Several Incorrect Tendencies in the Opposition to Dogmatism”], LTKJ, p. 65.Google Scholar

39 Ming-pien (literally, “elucidation of the dialectic”; but cf. also Chung-yung, 20.20), “Shih ko-jen chu-i” [“The Meaning of Individualism”], LTKJ, pp. 25–26.Google Scholar

40 SHCN, p. 72.Google Scholar

41 According to de Bary in SCT, pp. 89–90.Google Scholar

42 See my “The Philosophy of Chang Hsüeh-ch'eng,” Kansai Asiatic Society, Occasional Papers III (Kyoto, 1955), esp. pp. 32–33Google Scholar. For the affinity of philology to “practical activity” in the 17th and 18th centuries, see SCT, pp. 123–124.Google Scholar

43 Wu Yün (possibly a pen name), “Ko-jen ying-hsiung-chu-i” [“Individual Heroism”), LTKJ, p. 30.Google Scholar

44 Chang-shih i-shu (Chia-yeh-t'ang ed.), 2.25a.

45 Ibid, 2.24b.

46 Tse-tung, Mao, “In Opposition to Party Formalism,” in Compton, pp. 33f.Google Scholar

47 Teng, and Fairbank, , pp. 206–207.Google Scholar

48 JTK, pp. 51–56Google Scholar; see n. 34.

49 JTK, p. 51.Google Scholar

50 P'ei-nan, Li, “Fan-hsing tzu-ch'uan ying-kai tsen-yang hsieh-fa,” SHCN, pp. 107–114, esp. p. 108.Google Scholar

51 A favorite characterization, indifferently of any of the “isms,” is another phrase of this sort—hua erh pu shih, “mere display but no substance,” or, more literally, “flower but not fruit”; e.g., LTKJ, pp. 68, 73.Google Scholar

52 Tse-tung, Mao, Hsin min-chu-chu-i lun [On the New Democracy] (Hongkong: The New Democracy Press, 1949), p. 2.Google Scholar

53 Chang-shih i-shu, 2.11a.

54 Ibid, 5.7b.

55 JTK, pp. 1–9Google Scholar. Liu Shao-ch'i has a short essay entitled “The Class Character of Man,” on which Ch'en's essay appears to be in part based. Liu's essay is printed in English translation as an Appendix (pp. 113–122) to How to Be a Good Communist.

56 For an example, see the anonymous essay “Li Tzu-ch'eng ti chiao-hsün (li-shih hsiaoshuo)” [“The Moral of Li Tzu-ch'eng (A Story from History)”], SHCN, pp. 121–124.Google Scholar

57 Compton, , p. 112.Google Scholar

58 The name is analogous to such traditional appellations as “Ming-tao” (understanding, illustrating, making clear, the tao), which is the style of the Sung philosopher Ch'eng Hao. See n. 39 above.

59 Ming-ts'ao, , “Lun shen-tu,” LTKJ, pp. 55–57.Google Scholar

60 Ibid, p. 55.

61 Ibid, p. 56.

62 Ibid, p. 56.

63 Ibid, p. 57.

64 Ibid, p. 57.

65 Lo P'o, “Tsai lun shen-tu” [“Further Remarks on ‘Watching Oneself When Alone’”], LTKJ, pp. 58–62.Google Scholar

66 Ibid, p. 61.

67 Ibid, p. 60.