Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:19:44.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Chi-shih-lu of Yü Pen: A Note on the Sources for the Founding of the Ming Dynasty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Edward L. Dreyer
Edward L. Dreyer
Affiliation:
University of Miami
Get access

Abstract

In a 1926 article Wada Sei criticized the chronology of early Ming history given in the Ming T'ai-tsu shih-lu and other official sources. His conclusions have won general acceptance. Wada based his revisions on the Chi-shih-lu of Yu Pen, a lost work surviving only in fragmentary quotation. Recently, a more extensive text of the latter has come to light, and internal analysis of the longer text shows that its chronology is too confused for any of the Chi-shih-lu to be reliable as a corrective to the official sources. This removes the evidential basis for Wada's revised chronology, and requires the substitution for it of the order of events given in the Ming T'ai-tsu shih-lu.

Type
Research Notes and Abstracts
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , August 1972 , pp. 901 - 904
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Review by Dardess, John W. of Franke, W., An Introduction to the Sources of Ming History (New York: Oxford University Press, 1969)Google Scholar in JAS 29 (1970) 3, 687–8. Professor Dardess also provided the Project with the microfilm of Ming-hsing yeh-chi.

2 The edition used here is that of Chung-hua wen-shih ts'ung-shu, 2nd Series, Taipei, Hua-wen, 1968.

3 Sei, Wada, “Min no Taisō to Kōkin no zoku” (Ming T'ai-tsu and the Red Turban bandits), Tōyō Gakuhō 13 (1923) 2, 278–302Google Scholar.

4 The edition used here is that of Academia Sinica, Taipei, 1962.

5 The revisions of TTSL are discussed in W. Franke, op. cit., p. 30.

6 Ming-hsing yeh-chi 2.44b.

7 Ibid. 1.9a places Yü Pen under Feng Kuo-sheng's command as early as 1357; for Feng Kuo-sheng's place with the ambush force in 1360, cf TTSL 8.73b.

8 Ming-hsing yeh-chi 1.18b-19a.

9 CHSL 4.18a-20b, also in Ming-hsing yeh-chi 1.24ab.

10 Ming-shih, ch. 122.

11 TTSL 4.3a-4a, chi-mao = 28 July 1356. Wada, op. cit., p. 293 cites the Yü Pen text quoted in CHSL 1.29b, which also appears in Ming-hsing yeh-chi 1.18a. Yü Pen dates the event simply “21st Year (1361), 1st Month” but a change of tide would be announced on the Lunar New Year (in this case 2 February 1361).

12 Nakayama Hachirō, “Chin Yū-ryō no daiikkai Nankin kōgeki” (Ch'en Yu-liang's first attack on Nanking) in Suzuki Shun kyōjū kanreki kinen Tōyōshi ronsō (Articles on Chinese History Presented to Professor Suzuki Shun), Tōkyō (1964), 447–71.

13 Most of TTSL, ch. 8 is devoted to this battle.

14 Ming-hsing yeh-chi 1.24a, again dated simply “23rd Year (1363), 1st Month” and TTSL 14.1a, ping-yin = 4 February 1364.

15 Ming-hsing yeh-chi 1.20a-21b, dated “21st Year (1361), 11th Month” as opposed to TTSL (wu-ch'en = 6 April 1364), 6ab (keng-wu = 8 April) and 10ab (jen-hsü = 30 May).

16 Both the struggle for An-feng and the P'o-yang Lake campaign are described in TTSL, ch. 12; for the corresponding Yü Pen texts, cf. note 9, above.