Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:11:37.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rubies and Coral: The Lapidary Crafting of Language in Kerala

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2010

Rich Freeman
Get access

Extract

This paper addresses the problematic birth of the Malayalam language of Kerala in medieval South India. I say “problematic” because, of course, languages are never really born. Indeed, the dominant tradition of language genesis in India long asserted that all languages there only gradually arose by degenerate mutation out of the primordially beginningless Sanskrit. If there is a general truth to be found here, it is that since there are no human communities without speech, novel forms of language must always be emergent from earlier forms. Language genesis is thus always a matter of linguistic differentiation, away from some standard and towards another. But the sustained contrivance of these particular claims for Sanskrit also reflects another linguistic truth: that languages and their constituent elements are routinely shaped, conditioned, and ideologically figured by being themselves made into objects of discourse. In terms of language differentiation, this means the continuum of transformations that may at some point coalesce into a claim for linguistic separateness is always modeled and monitored in and through language itself. The reflexive or metalinguistic nature of this process, however, is always contextually oriented to the social fields in which it operates, so that the ideological positions and interests in those fields tend to carry over into the discursive products of a language and its literature. This study will attempt to highlight the web of relations among language varieties, ideologies, social contexts, and identities, as documented in a treatise on the language of medieval Kerala when that region first raised its claims for a distinctive linguistic identity.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 38 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Anderson, , Benedict, . 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London; New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Emerson, C. and Holquist, M., trans. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Balakrsnan, P. K. 1983. Jātivyavasthitiyum Kēralacaritravum (Pathanam). Kottayam, Kerala: National Book Stall.Google Scholar
Bauman, , Richard, , and Briggs, Charles. 1990. "Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life." Annual Reviews in Anthropology 19 :59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, , Pierre, . 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. G. Raymond and M. Adamson, trans. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chaitanya, , Krishna, . 1971. A History of Malayalam Literature. New Delhi: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
Dwivedi, R. C. 1977. The Poetic Light: Kāvyaprakāśa of Mammata. Vol. 1. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Enkvist, , Nils, . 1994. “Context.” In Literature and the New Interdisciplinary: Poetics, Linguistics, History, Edited by Sell, R. and Verdonk, P.. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Ezhuthachan, K. N. 1975. The History of the Grammatical Theories in Malayalam. Trivandrum, Kerala: Dravidian Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Foucault, , Michel, . 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Sheridan, A. M., trans. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Foucault, , Michel, . 1983. “Afterword: The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Edited by Dreyfus, H. and Rabinow, P.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, , Richardson, J.. 1991. Purity and Violence: Sacred Power in the Teyyam Worship of Malabar. Ph.D. diss., Department of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Gal, , Susan, , and Irvine, Judith T.. 1995. “The Boundaries of Languages and Disciplines: How Ideologies Construct Difference.” Social Research 62(4): 967–1001.Google Scholar
George, K. M. 1968. A Survey of Malayalam Literature. New York: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar
Goodwin, , Charles, , and Duranti, Alessandro. 1992. “Rethinking Context: An Introduction.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, edited by Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
GōpālkrsnanNāyar, M. Nāyar, M., ed. and trans. 1990. Unniyaccīcaritam. Trivandrum: State Institute of Languages.Google Scholar
Pillai, Gopala. 1985. Linguistic Interpretation of Lilātilakam. Trivandrum, Kerala: Dravidian Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Gōpikuttan, , ed. and trans. 1986. Līlātilakam (1 Mutal 3 Vareyulla Śilpannal). Kottayam, Kerala: National Book Stall.Google Scholar
Gramsci, , Antonio, . 1985. Selections from Cultural Writings. Boelhower, W., trans. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, , William, . 1996. Language and Communicative Practices. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hultzsch, E. [1896–97] 1979. “No. 17-Arulala Perumal Inscription of Ravivarman of Kerala.” Epigraphia Indica 4: 145–48.Google Scholar
Hultzsch, E. [1905–1906] 1981. “No. 2-Tiruvadi Inscription of Ravivarman; A.D. 1313.” Epigraphia Indica 8: 8–9.Google Scholar
Jakobson, , Roman, . 1960. “Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics.” In Style in Language, edited by Sebeok, T.. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Kielhorn, F. [1896–97] 1979. “No. 18-Ranganatha Inscription of Ravivarman of Kerala.” Epigraphia Indica 4: 148–52.Google Scholar
, KrsnanNāyar, C. 1994. Pāttukavitakalute Sāmūuhika Prasakti. Trivandrum: State Institute of Languages.Google Scholar
Pilla, Kunnan, Ilankulam, , ed. and trans. Līilātilakam: Manipravālalaksanam. Kottayam, Kerala: National Book Stall.Google Scholar
Pilla, Kunnan, Śūranāttu, , ed. and trans. [1966] 1996. Līlātilakam: Pathanavum Vyākhyānavum. Trivandrum: State Institute of Languages.Google Scholar
Levinson, , Stephen, . 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lienhard, , Siegfried, . 1984. A History of Classical Poetry: Sanskrit-Pali-Prakrit. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Lucy, , John, . 1993. “Reflexive Language and the Human Disciplines.” In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, Edited by Lucy, John A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, NilakanthaSastri, K. A. 1966. A History of South India from Prehistoric Times to the Fall of Vijayanagara. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Padmanābha, Menōn K. P. [1917] 1989. Tiruvitāmkūr (Vēndtu) Rājavamśam, Edited by Unni, P. Bhaskaran. Trichur: Kerala Sahitya Akademi.Google Scholar
Rāghava, Vāriar, M. R. 1990. “Kēralīyata.” In Kēralīyata Caritramānanrial—Studies in Kerala History and Culture by Vāriyar, M. R. Rāghava. Śukapuram, Kerala: Vallattol Vidyāpītham.Google Scholar
Rāghava, Vāriar, M. R. 1993–1994. “Līlātilakattinre Rāstlyam.” Mātrbhūmi Ālcappatippu 71(43): 23–28.Google Scholar
Rāghava Vāriar, M. R., and Gurukkal, Rājan. 1992. Kēralacaritram. Śukapuram, Kerala: Vallattōl Vidyāptham.Google Scholar
Raja, P. K. S. 1966. Medieval Kerala. Calicut: Navakerala Co-operative Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
Michael, Silverstein. 1979. “Language Structure and Linguistic Ideology.” In The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, edited by Clyne, R., Hanks, W., and Hofbauer, C.. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Sreedhara Menon, A. 1980. A Survey of Kerala History. Kottayam: National Book Stall.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyan, S. 1977. The Commonness in the Metre of the Dravidian Languages. Trivandrum, Kerala: Dravidian Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Urban, Greg. 1991. “The Semiotics of State-Indian Linguistic Relationships: Peru, Paraguay, Brazil.” In Nation-States and Indians in Latin America, edited by Urban, G. and Sherzer, J.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
VĒelāyudhan Pilla, P. V. 1966. Madhyākalamalayālam. Trivandrum: University of Kerala.Google Scholar
Venkatachari, K. K. A. 1978. The Manipravala Literature of the Śri Vaisnava Ācāryas. Bombay: Ananthacarya Research Institute.Google Scholar
Kathryn, Woolard, and Schieffelin, Bambi. 1994. “Language Ideology.” Annual Review of Anthropology 23 :55–82.Google Scholar