Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:30:49.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Literacy under Authority: The Mongolian Cultural Campaigns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2016

Phillip P. Marzluf
Phillip P. Marzluf*
Affiliation:
Phillip P. Marzluf ([email protected]) is Associate Professor of English at Kansas State University.
Get access

Abstract

In the twentieth century, authoritarian states throughout Asia mobilized mass populations to adopt modern subjectivities and national identities. Literacy campaigns and the development of formal education systems were key strategies in shaping these subjectivities and identities, a social process that continues to have enormous material, affective, behavioral, and epistemological ramifications, even long after the eclipse of the authoritarian governments themselves. To contribute more to the understanding about how these massive social projects coerced and persuaded nonurban, pastoral, and semi-nomadic populations, this article explores the 1950s and 1960s Cultural Campaigns in the socialist Mongolian People's Republic (1924–90), which emphasized hygiene, health, literacy, and ideology. Oral history accounts document how the socialist Mongolian state infiltrated the private spaces of Mongolians and shaped their attitudes toward reading and writing and other desirable social goals. Additionally, these accounts suggest ways that pastoral Mongolians subtly resisted and challenged the authority of the socialist Mongolian state.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 76 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 135 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Arnove, Robert F., and Graff, Harvey J., eds. 1987. National Literacy Campaigns: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Baabar, . 1999. Twentieth Century Mongolia. Cambridge: White Horse Press.Google Scholar
Barton, David, and Hamilton, Mary. 1998. Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bawden, Charles R. 1968. The Modern History of Mongolia. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles, and Rogers, Paul. 2008. “Writing and Secular Knowledge Outside Modern European Institutions.” In Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text, ed. Bazerman, Charles, 143–56. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Best, Shaun. 2002. Introduction to Politics and Society. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Billé, Franck. 2014. Sinophobia: Anxiety, Violence, and the Making of Mongolian Identity. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, Deborah. 2001. Literacy in American Lives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Jeffrey. 2000. Thank You, Comrade Stalin! Soviet Public Culture from Revolution to Cold War. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bulag, Uradyn E. 1998. Nationalism and Hybridity in Mongolia. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buyandelger, Manduhai. 2013. Tragic Spirits: Shamanism, Memory, and Gender in Contemporary Mongolia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Yinghong. 2008. Creating the “New Man”: From Enlightenment Ideals to Socialist Realities. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission on Script Change. 1956. Kadrchuudig bolovsruulakhad khereglekh Mongol shine üsgiin üseglel [Primer for cadre training in the new Mongolian script]. Khökhkhot: Inner Mongolian People's Publication Commission.Google Scholar
Connery, Christopher Leigh. 1999. The Empire of the Text: Writing and Authority in Early Imperial China. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Crisp, Simon. 1989. “Soviet Planning since 1917–53.” In Language Planning in the Soviet Union, ed. Kirkwood, Michael, 23–45. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Crossley, Pamela K. 1994. “Manchu Education.” In Education and Society in Late Imperial China, 1600–1900, eds. Elman, Benjamin A. and Woodside, Alexander, 340–78. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, Georges B. J. 2003. The Sound of Two Hands Clapping: The Education of a Tibetan Buddhist Monk. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Eklof, Ben. 1987. “Russian Literacy Campaigns, 1861–1939.” In National Literacy Campaigns: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, eds. Arnove, Robert F. and Graff, Harvey J., 123–45. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Empson, Rebecca. 2011. Harnessing Fortune: Personhood, Memory, and Place in Mongolia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, eds. Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter, 87–104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galsanpuntsag, D. 1970. “Nom, Nomin San, Unshigch. Khoyor: Unshigch Yuu Ankhaarakh Ve?” [Books, libraries, and readers. Part II: What should readers pay attention to?]. Ukhuulagchiin övriin devter [Propagandist's notebook] 18:27–30.Google Scholar
Gee, James Paul. 2012. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1985. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Vol. 2: The Nation-State and Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Graeme J. 2011. Symbols and Legitimacy in Soviet Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graff, Harvey J. 1979. The Literacy Myth: Cultural Integration and Social Structure in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Graff, Harvey J. 2011. Literacy Myths, Legacies, & Lessons: New Studies on Literacy. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Grivelet, Stéphane. 2001. “Digraphia in Mongolia.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 150:75–93.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Mary. 2012. Literacy and the Politics of Representation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Thomas. 2001. Wages of Violence: Naming and Identity in Postcolonial Bombay. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Heath, Shirley Brice. 1983. Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heath, Shirley Brice, and Street, Brian V.. 2008. On Ethnography: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Heller, Mikhail. 1988. Cogs in the Wheel: The Formation of Soviet Man. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 1992. “The Moral Authority of the Past in Post-Socialist Mongolia.” Religion, State and Society 20(3–4):375–89.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline, and Sneath, David. 1999. The End of Nomadism? Society, State, and the Environment in Inner Asia. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapišovská, Veronica. 2005. “Language Planning in Mongolia I.” Mongolica Pragensia, 55–83.Google Scholar
Kaplonski, Christopher. 1998. “Creating National Identity in Socialist Mongolia.” Central Asian Survey 17(1):35–49.Google Scholar
Kaplonski, Christopher. 2004. Truth, History and Politics in Mongolia: The Memory of Heroes. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplonski, Christopher. 2014. The Lama Question: Violence, Sovereignty, and Exception in Early Socialist Mongolia. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Catriona. 2006. “Shaping the ‘Future Race.’” In Everyday Life in Early Soviet Russia: Taking the Revolution Inside, eds. Kiaer, Christina and Naiman, Eric, 256–81. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kirschenbaum, Lisa A. 2000. Small Comrades: Revolutionizing Childhood in Soviet Russia, 1917–1932. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leavy, Patricia. 2011. Oral History. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, Moshe. 1994. The Making of the Soviet System: Essays in the Social History of Interwar Russia. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Marzluf, Phillip P. 2015. “The Pastoral Home School: Rural, Vernacular, and Grassroots Literacies in Early Soviet Mongolia.” Central Asian Survey 34(2):204–18.Google Scholar
Morozova, Irina Y. 2002. The Comintern and Revolution in Mongolia. Cambridge: White Horse Press.Google Scholar
Morozova, Irina Y. 2009. Socialist Revolutions in Asia: The Social History of Mongolia in the 20th Century. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Myadar, Orhon. 2016. “City and Ideology.” Newsletter 74:42–43.Google Scholar
Namkhainyambuu, Tserendash. 2000. Bounty from the Sheep: Autobiography of a Herdsman. Translated by Rossabi, Mary. Cambridge: White Horse Press.Google Scholar
Natsagdorj, Shagdarjav. 1981. BNMAUin soyolin tüükh [The cultural history of the MPR]. Ulaanbaatar: State Publishers.Google Scholar
Nazarova, L. K. 1988. “An Outline of the History of the Methods of Teaching Literacy in Soviet Russia, 1917–1947.” In Cognitive Psychology and Reading in the USSR, ed. Downing, John, 37–65. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Oral History of Twentieth Century Mongolia . 2013. University of Cambridge. Mongolia and Inner Asia Studies Unit. http://amantuuh.socanth.cam.ac.uk/ (accessed November 12, 2016).Google Scholar
Pürevjav, C., and Dashjamts, D.. 1965. BNMAU-d süm khiid lam narin asuudlin shiideverlesen ni: 1921–1940 [On decisions on the monastery and lama issues in the MPR: 1921–1940]. Ulaanbaatar: Ulsin khevleliin khereg erkhlekh khoroo.Google Scholar
Rawski, Evelyn Sakakida. 1979. Education and Popular Literacy in Ch'ing China. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rempel, Chris. 2012. “The 1961 Cuban National Literacy Campaign: Creating a New Citizen.” Kansas State University. Department of English. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Rinchensambuu, Galsan. 1963. Mongol ulsad 1913–1944 ond khevlesen Mongol nomin bürtgel [Record of Mongolian books published in Mongolia, 1913–1944]. Ulaanbaatar: Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Rogaski, Ruth. 2004. Hygienic Modernity: Meanings of Health and Disease in Treaty-Port China. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1992. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shagdarsüren, Tsevel. 2009. “A Short Survey of the Scripts Used by the Mongols (The Place of Mongolian Script among Other ‘Mongol’ Scripts).” Mongolo-Tibetica Pragensia 2(1):17–27.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael G. 1998. Language and Power in the Creation of the USSR, 1917–1953. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Starks, Tricia. 2008. Body Soviet: Propaganda, Hygiene, and the Revolutionary State. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Steiner-Khamsi, Gita, and Stolpe, Ines. 2006. Educational Import: Local Encounters with Global Forces in Mongolia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Street, Brian V. 1985. Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Street, Brian V. 1995. Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography and Education. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Tsenddoo, Byambajav. 2007. Soyolin dovtolgoo: Ankhni khet gürnees süülchiin nüüdelchin [Cultural campaign: From the first empire to the last nomad]. Ulaanbaatar: Nepko.Google Scholar
Tsetsentsolmon, Baatarnaran. 2014. “The ‘Gong Beat’ against the ‘Uncultured’: Contested Notions of Culture and Civilization in Mongolia.” Asian Ethnicity 15(4):422–38.Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1971. Education in the Mongolian People's Republic. Bangkok: UNESCO.Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1982. Cultural Policy in the Mongolian People's Republic: A Study Prepared under the Auspices of the National Commission for UNESCO. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar