Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:09:12.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individualism in Taishō Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Sharon Hamilton Nolte
Get access

Abstract

The author identifies three meanings of individualism (kojinshugi) in Japanese journalism during the Taishō period. They were: first, individual character and talent should be cultivated for the purpose of strengthening the state and fostering the active commitment of individuals to state policies; second, personal autonomy and self-expression were legitimate within a restricted “private” sphere that coexisted uneasily with the dominant values of the “public” sphere; and third, the development of free, autonomous individuals was the most fundamental value by which state and society should be judged. Proponents of individualism were unable to alter the state structure established by the Meiji Constitution or the state ideology of submission; their innovative thinking did serve as a leavening agent within state structure by demanding new relationships between elite and masses and by sustaining a high degree of elite pluralism.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , August 1984 , pp. 667 - 684
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Beard, Charles. 1923. The Administration and Politics of Tokyo. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Harootunian, Harry D. 1974. “Between Politics and Culture: Authority and the Ambiguities of Intellectual Choice in Imperial Japan.” In Silberman, Bernard and Harootunian, H. D., eds., Japan in Crisis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Akihiko, Harubara. 1969. Nihon shinbun tsūshi [The history of Japanese newspaper circulation]. Tokyo: Gendai Jyaanarizumu.Google Scholar
Raichō, Hiratsuka. 1912a. “Enmado yori: Tanaka Ōdō no Tetsujinshugi” [From the round window: Tanaka Ōdō's “Philosopher king-ism”]. Seitō [Bluestocking] 2, no. 3:92–103.Google Scholar
Raichō, Hiratsuka. 1912b. “Nora-san ni” [To Nora]. Seitō [Bluestocking] 2, no. 1:140.Google Scholar
Raichō, Hiratsuka. 1975. Genshi, josei wa taiyō de atta [Once, woman was the sun]. 4 vols. Tokyo: Ōtsuki.Google Scholar
Kiyoshi, Inoue and Tōru, Watanabe, eds. 1972. Taishōki no kyūshinteki jiyūshugi: “Tōyō keizai shinpō” o chūshin toshite [Radical liberalism in the Taishō period: Focusing on “Oriental economist”]. Tokyo: Tōyō Keizai Shinpō.Google Scholar
Iriye, Akira. 1972. Pacific Estrangement: Japanese and American Expansion, 1879–1911 Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tanzan, Ishibashi. 1970–1972. lshibashi Tanzan zenshū [Complete works of Ishibashi Tanzan]. 15 vols. Tokyo: Tōyō Keizai Shinpō.Google Scholar
Hōmei, Iwano. 1917. “Wakamiya-Tanaka hikaku ron” [Comparing Wakamiya and Tanaka]. Chūō kōron [Central review] 32, no. 12:70–74.Google Scholar
Hōmei, Iwano. 1918. “Tanaka Ōdō Shi no ‘Gakumon no dokuritsu’” [Tanaka Odo's “On academic freedom”]. Bunshō sekai [The world of letters] 13, no. 3:99–101.Google Scholar
Hōmei, Iwano. 1922a. “Hitsū no tetsugaku” [The philosophy of sorrow]. In Hōmei zenshū [Complete works of Hōmei]. Vol. 15. Tokyo: Kokumin Tosho.Google Scholar
Hōmei, Iwano. 1922b. “Kokka jinsei ron” [On the personality of the state]. In Hōmei zenshū [Complete works of Hōmei]. Vol. 15. Tokyo: Kokumin Tosho.Google Scholar
Kinmonth, Earl H. 1980. “Nakamura Keiu and Samuel Smiles: A Victorian Confucian and a Confucian Victorian.” American Historical Review 85, no. 3:535–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kōsaka, Masaaki. 1958. Japanese Thought in the Meiji Era. Trans. Abosch, David. Tokyo: Pan-Pacific Press.Google Scholar
Maruyama, Masao. 1969. Thought and Behavior in Modern Japanese Politics. Ed. Morris, Ivan. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Sannosuke. 1978. “The Roots of Political Disillusionment: ‘Public’ and ‘Private’ in Japan.” In Koschmann, J. Victor, ed. Authority and the Individual in Japan. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Hiroshi, Minami. 1965. Taishō bunka [Taishō culture]. Tokyo: Keisō.Google Scholar
Minear, Richard. 1970. Japanese Tradition and Western Law: Emperor, State, and Law in the Thought of Hozumi Yatsuka. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nobuhiko, Murakami. 1975. “Fujin mondai to fujin kaihō undō” [The woman problem and the women's liberation movement]. In Kōza, Iwanami, ed. Nihon rekishi (Japanese history]. Vol. 18. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Akira, Nakano. 1975. Taishō jiyū kyōiku no kenkyū [On the Taisho free education movement]. Tokyo: Reimei.Google Scholar
Toshio, Nakauchi. 1973. Kindai Nihon kyōiku shisōshi [The history of educational theory in modern Japan). Tokyo: Kokudo.Google Scholar
Noguchi, Takehiko. 1979. “Love and Death in the Early Modern Novel.” In Craig, Albert M., ed., Japan: A Comparative View. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pyle, Kenneth. 1974. “The Advantages of Followership: German Economics and Japanese Bureaucrats, 1890–1925.” Journal of Japanese Studies 1:127–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masatarō, Sawayanagi. 1925. Sawayanagi zenshū [Complete works of Sawayanagi]. Vol. 1. Tokyo: Sawayanagi Zenshū Henshū Iinkai.Google Scholar
Scheiner, Irwin. 1978. “Benevolent Lords and Honorable Peasants: Rebellion and Peasant Consciousness in Tokugawa Japan.” In Najita, Tetsuo and Scheiner, Irwin, eds., Japanese Thought in the Tokugawa Period, 1600–1868. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Atsuki, Shibamura. 1980. “Dai toshi ni okeru kenryoku to minshū no kōdō” [The behavior of authority and the people in major cities]. In Koyama Hitoshi, Taishōki no kenryoku to minshū [Authority and the people in the Taishō era]. Tokyo: Hōritsu Bunka.Google Scholar
Hōgetsu, Shimamura. 1909. Kindai bungei no kenkyū [Studies in modern letters]. Tokyo: Hakubunkan.Google Scholar
Hōgetsu, Shimamura. 1913. “Kindai bungei to fujin mondai” [Modern letters and the woman problem]. Chūō kōron [Central review] 28(July):2–23. Special issue on “Fujin mondai” [The woman problem].Google Scholar
Hiromi, Sotani. 1978. “Fujin kōron no shisō” [Ideas in “Women's review”]. In Kenkyūkai, Kindai Joseichi, ed., Onnatachi no kindai [Women's modernity]. Tokyo: Kashiwa.Google Scholar
Sudermann, Hermann Sudermann. 1895. Magda. Trans. Winslow, Charles. New York: French.Google Scholar
Ōdō, Tanaka. 1908. “Waga kuni ni okeru shizenshugi o ronzu” [On naturalism in our country]. Myōjō [Shining star], August, pp. 1–113.Google Scholar
Ōdō, Tanaka. 1909a. “Iwanō Hōmei Shi no geijutsukan to jinseikan to o ronzu” [On Iwano Hōmei's view of the arts and human nature]. Chūō kōron [Central review] 24, no. 9:19–71.Google Scholar
Ōdō, Tanaka. 1909b. “Jiyū shisōka no rinrikan” [Ethics of a freethinker]. Shōsai yori gaitō ni [From the study to the streets]. Tokyo: Kōbundō.Google Scholar
Ōdō, Tanaka. 1912. “Shimamura Hōgetsu Shi no shizenshugi o ronzu” [On Shimamura Hōgetsu's naturalism]. In Tetsujinshugi [Philosopher king-ism]. Vol. 1. Tokyo: Kobundo.Google Scholar
Ōdō, Tanaka. 1915. “Hiratsuka Raichō Shi ni ataete Shi no fujinkan o ronzu” [To Hiratsuka Raichō, on her concept of women]. Chūō kōron [Central review] 28(July): 104–27. Special issue on “Taishō shin Kiun” [The new Taishō spirit].Google Scholar
Ōdō, Tanaka. 1918. Tettei kojinshugi [Radical individualism]. Tokyo: Tenyūsha.Google Scholar
Takako, Tanaka. 1943. Tōyō [Peach blossom]. Tokyo: Yōa.Google Scholar
Shunsuke, Tsurumi. 1964. “Chūō kōron no rekishi” [The history of “Central Review”]. Shisō [Ideas], February, pp. 121–29.Google Scholar
Walthall, Anne. 1979. “The Ethics of Protest by Commoners in Late Eighteenth-Century Japan.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Seiichi, Yoshida. 1975. Kindai bungei hyōron shi [The history of modern literary review]. Tokyo: Shibundō.Google Scholar