Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T04:23:47.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hong Kong's Problematic Democratic Transition: Power Dependency or Business Hegemony?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2010

Get access

Extract

Hong Kongs Political Development since the 1960s has seemed to indicate bright prospects for democratization, since Hong Kong had attained most of the “prerequisites” for democratization (Lipset 1994). Hong Kong had considerable wealth and a rising middle class, no extreme or intolerable inequalities, and a high level of socioeconomic development. According to the wealth explanation of Lipset (1959) and Huntington (1984), Hong Kong's robust economy should make possible high levels of urbanization, industrialization, education, literacy, and mass media exposure, all of which are conducive to democracy.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Burns, John P. 1994. “Hong Kong in 1993: The Struggle for Authority Intensifies.” Asian Survey 34: 5563.Google Scholar
Chan, Joseph Man, and Lee., Chin-Chuan 1991. Mass Media and Political Transition: The Hong Kong Press in China’s Orbit. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Chan, Ming K. 1991. “Democracy Derailed.” In The Hong Kong Basic Law, edited by Chan, Ming K., and Clark, David J.Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Cheng, Joseph, Y. S. 1984a. “The Future of Hong Kong: Surveys of the Hong Kong People’s Attitudes.” The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 12: 113—42.Google Scholar
Cheng, Joseph, Y. S. 1984b. Hong Kong In Search of a Future. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Joseph Y. S. 1989. “The Democracy Movement in Hong Kong: Difficulties and Prospects.” Paper presented at a conference on Hong Kong Towards 1997 and Beyond, 26–27 January, Honolulu.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Tun-Jen, Eun Mee Kim., And 1994. “Making Democracy: Generalizing the South Korean Case.” In The Politics of Democratization: Generalizing East Asian Experience, edited by Friedman, Edward. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Cheung, Anthony B. L. 1994. “Hong Kong Pro-Democracy Parties’ Role and Function” (in Chinese). Meeting Point Forum (July): 1—3.Google Scholar
Ching, Frank. 1997. “Misreading Hong Kong.” Foreign Affairs 76 (3): 5366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Robert. 1994. “Public Opinion.” In The Other Hong Kong Report 1993, edited by H, Donald. McMillen and Si-Wai Man. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Cottrell, Robert. 1993. The End of Hong Kong. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Davies, Stephen N. G. 1977. “One Brand of Politics Rekindled.” Hong Kong Law Journal 7: 44–80.Google Scholar
Degolyer, Michael. 1994. “Politics, Politicians, and Political Parties.” In The Other Hong Kong Report 1993, edited by Donald, H.McMillen and Si-Wai Man. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Draft Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on the Future of Hong Kong. 1984. Hong Kong: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Ghai, Yash. 1991 “The Past and the Future of Hong Kong’s Constitution.” The China Quarterly 128: 794814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1984. “Will More Countries Become Democratic? Political Science Quarterly 99: 193218.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry L., and Philippe, C. Schmitter. 1991. “Modes of Transition in Latin America, Southern and Eastern Europe.” International Social Science Journal 28: 269–84.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1993. “Comparative Historical Research and Rational Choice Theory: The Case of Transitions to Democracy.” Theory and Society 22: 412–27.Google Scholar
Kuan, Hsin-Chi. 1991. “Power Dependence and Democratic Transition: The Case of Hong Kong.” The China Quarterly 128: 775–93.Google Scholar
Lam, Jermain T. M. 1994. “From a Submissive to an Adversarial Legislature.” Asian Profile 22: 2132.Google Scholar
Lau, Emily. 1985. “Basic Law Makers.” Far Eastern Economic Review, 4 July.Google Scholar
Lau, Siu-Kai. 1995. “Hong Kong’s Path of Democratization.” Asiatische Studien Etudes Asiatiques 49: 7190.Google Scholar
Lau, Siu-Kai, and Kuan., Hsin-Chi 1988. The Ethos of the Hong Kong Chinese. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Chin-Chuan. 1997. “Mass Structure and Regime Change in Hong Kong.” In The Challenge of Hong Kong’s Reintegration with China, edited by K, Ming. Chan. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Martin. 1996. “The Fight for Democracy.” In Hong Kong Remembers, edited by Blyth, Sally, and Wotherspoon., IanHong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Wing-Tat. 1996. “Social Movements and Party Politics.” Outspoken (June): 4–5.Google Scholar
Leung, Joe. C. B. 1986. “Community Development in Hong Kong: Contributions towards Democratization.” Community Development Journal 21: 310.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy.” American Political Science Review 53: 69105.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. 1994. “The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited.” American Sociological Review 59: 122.Google Scholar
Lo, Shiu Hing. 1997. The Politics of Democratization in Hong Kong. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Lo, Shiu Hing. 1998. “Mass Media and Politics in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.” East Asia: An International Quarterly 16: 111—36.Google Scholar
Tai-lok, Lui, and Chiu., Stephen 1997. “The Structure of Social Movements in Contemporary Hong Kong.” China Information 12: 97113Google Scholar
Miners, N. J. 1989. “Moves towards Representative Government 1984–1988.” In Hong Kong: The Challenge of Transformation, edited by Cheek-Milby, Kathleen and Mushkat, Miron. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Ngo, Hang Yue, and Ming Lau., Chung 1996. “Labor and Employment.” In The Other Hong Kong Report 1996, edited by Myaw, Mee-kau, Li., and Si-mingHong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Pepper, Suzanne. 1997. “Hong Kong, 1997: East vs. West and the Struggle for Democratic Reform within the Chinese State.” Asian Survey 37: 683704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberti, Mark. 1994. The Fall of Hong Kong: China’s Triumph and Britain’s Betrayal. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Evelyne, H. Stephens, and Stephens, John. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Ian. 1989. Political Change and the Crisis of Legitimacy in Hong Kong. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Ian. 1992. “An Overview of the Hong Kong Legislative Council Elections of 1991.” In Votes Without Power, edited by Kwok, Rowena, Leung, Joan, and Scott, Ian. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Sum, Ngai-Ling. 1995. “More than a War of Words: Identity, Politics and the Struggle for Dominance during the Recent Political Reform Period in Hong Kong.” Economy and Society 24: 67100.Google Scholar
Tien, Hung-Mao. 1992. “Taiwan’s Evolution Toward Democracy: A Historical Perspective.” In Taiwan: Beyond the Economic Miracle, edited by Simon, Denis F., and Y. M. Kau., MichaelArmonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Toypa (The Outstanding Young Persons’ Association). 1984. Candid Opinion. Hong Kong: The Outstanding Young Persons' Association.Google Scholar
Weiner, Myron. 1987. “Empirical Democratic Theory.” In Competitive Elections in Developing Countries, edited by Weiner, M. and Ozbudun, E.. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wesley-Smith, Peter. 1987. Constitutional and Administrative Law in Hong Kong. Vol. 1. Hong Kong: China and Hong Kong Law Studies.Google Scholar