Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:37:12.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

History, Zomia, Closure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2021

Eric Tagliacozzo Open the ORCID record for Eric Tagliacozzo [Opens in a new window]
Eric Tagliacozzo*
Affiliation:
Eric Tagliacozzo ([email protected]) is John Stambaugh Professor of History at Cornell University.
Get access

Extract

It is difficult to expound in any pithy fashion on the imprint that James C. Scott's work has had on writing history in the orbit of Asia. Where to start? From The Moral Economy of the Peasant all the way to Against the Grain, Scott's work has found receptive and fertile ground among his peers in Asian studies, who have often proudly pointed out to their non-Asianist colleagues that Scott is “one of their own.” This has certainly been true “internally” as well, in the ways that Southeast Asianists have spoken to their fellow professionals in the larger, allied subdisciplines of South and East Asian studies. It does not matter that Scott's books have touched on a wide variety of subjects: the central concerns with power, agency, space, and the essence of a shared humanity have all resonated with his professional interlocutors.

Keywords

altitudefrontiershistorySoutheast AsiaJames C. ScottZomia
Type
Forum—Power and Agency: The Discipline-Shifting Work of James C. Scott
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 80 , Issue 2 , May 2021 , pp. 423 - 430
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc., 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Scott, James C., The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1976)Google Scholar; Scott, Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2017).

2 Scott, James C., The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2009)Google ScholarPubMed.

3 Shneiderman, Sara, “Are the Central Himalayas in Zomia? Some Scholarly and Political Considerations across Time and Space,” Journal of Global History 5, no. 2 (2010): 289–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Fiskesjo, Magnus, “Mining, History, and the Anti-State Wa: The Politics of Autonomy between Burma and China,” Journal of Global History 5, no. 2 (2010): 241–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Giersch, C. P., “Across Zomia with Merchants, Monks, and Musk: Process Geographies, Trade Networks, and the Inner-East-Southeast Asian Borderlands,” Journal of Global History 5, no. 2 (2010): 215–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Michaud, Jean, “Editorial: Zomia and Beyond,” Journal of Global History 5, no. 2 (2010): 187–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Brass, T., “Scott's ‘Zomia,’ or a Populist Post-Modern History of Nowhere,” Journal of Contemporary Asia 42, no. 1 (2012): 132–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Gibson-Graham, J. K., “‘After’ Area Studies? Place-Based Knowledge for Our Time,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34, no. 5 (2016): 799–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barter, Shane, “Area Studies, Asian Studies, and the Pacific Basin,” Geographical Review 105, no. 1 (2015): 105–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Saha, Jonathan, “Is It in India? Colonial Burma as a ‘Problem’ in South Asian History,” South Asian History and Culture 7, no. 1 (2016): 23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Jean Michaud, “Zomia and Beyond,” In Routledge Handbook of Asian Borderlands, ed. Alexander Horstmann, Martin Saxer, and Alessandro Rippa (New York: Routledge, 2018), 73–88.

11 Jean Michaud, “What's (Written) History For? On James C. Scott's Zomia, Especially Chapter 6½,” Anthropology Today 33, no. 1 (2017): 6–10.

12 James Rush, Opium to Java, 1860–1910 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1990); Carl Trocki, Opium, Empire, and the Global Economy: A Study of the Asian Opium Trade (New York: Routledge, 1999); Timothy Brook and Bob Tadashi Wakabayashi, eds., Opium Regimes: China, Britain and Japan, 1839–1952 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000); Diana Kim, Empires of Vice: The Rise of Opium Prohibition across Southeast Asia (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2020).

13 David Atwill, The Chinese Sultanate: Islam, Ethnicity, and the Panthay Rebellion in Southwest China, 1856–1873 (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2005); C. P. Giersch, Corporate Conquests: Business, the State, and the Origins of Ethnic Inequality in Southwest China (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2020).

14 Arjun Appadurai, ed., The Social Life of Things (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).

15 Winichakul Thongchai, Siam Mapped: The History of the Geo-Body of a Nation (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 1997).

16 Eric Tagliacozzo, “Ambiguous Commodities, Unstable Frontiers: The Case of Burma, Siam, and Imperial Britain, 1800–1900,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 46, no. 2 (2004): 354–77; Tagliacozzo, Secret Trades, Porous Borders: Smuggling and States along a Southeast Asian Frontier, 1865–1915 (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2005).

17 Thant Myint-U, The Making of Modern Burma (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).

18 Andrew Walker, The Legend of the Golden Boat: Regulation, Trade and Traders in the Borderlands of Laos, Thailand, China and Burma (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 1999); Grant Evans, Chris Hutton, and Kuah Khun Eng, eds., Where China Meets Southeast Asia: Social and Cultural Change in the Border Regions (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2000); Christian C. Lentz, Contested Territory: Dien Bien Phu and the Making of Northwest Vietnam (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2019).

19 Alfred McCoy, The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia (New York: Harper & Row, 1972); Bertil Lintner, Burma in Revolt: Opium and Insurgency since 1948 (Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books, 1999); Edith Mirante, Burmese Looking Glass (New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 1994).

20 Anne Maxwell-Hill, Merchants and Migrants: Ethnicity and Trade among Yunnanese Chinese in Southeast Asia (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1998).

21 Bobby Anderson and Patamawadee Jongruck, “Forestry, Illegibility, and Illegality in Omkoi, Northwest Thailand,” Forest and Society 1, no. 2 (2017): 98–109; Bobby Anderson, “People Land and Poppy: The Political Ecology of Opium and the Historical Impact of Alternative Development in Northwest Thailand,” Forest and Society 1, no. 1 (2017): 48–59; Bobby Anderson, “Zomia's Vestiges: Illegible Peoples and Legible Crimes in Omkoi, Northwest Thailand,” South East Asia Research 26, no. 1 (2018): 38–57.

22 Ariel I. Ahram and Charles King, “The Warlord as Arbitrageur,” Theory and Society 41, no. 2 (2012): 169–86.

23 Christoph Antons, “Asian Borderlands and the Legal Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions,” Modern Asian Studies 47, no. 4 (2013): 1403–33.

24 Jacob Shell, “Elephant Convoys beyond the State: Animal-Based Transport as Subversive Logics,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37, no. 5 (2019): 905–23; Shell, “The Enigma of the Asian Elephant,” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109, no. 4 (2019): 1154–71.

25 George Orwell, “Shooting an Elephant,” in Eight Modern Essayists, ed. William Smart (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1936).

26 Gerardo L. Munck and Richard Snyder, “James C. Scott: Peasants, Power, and the Art of Resistance,” in Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics, ed. Gerardo L. Munck and Richard Snyder (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007), 351–91.

27 Colin Gordon, ed., Michel Foucault, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings (New York: Vintage Books, 1980).

28 Willem van Schendel, “Geographies of Knowing, Geographies of Ignorance: Jumping Scale in Southeast Asia,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20, no. 6 (2002): 647–68.

29 Oliver Tappe, “Introduction: Frictions and Fictions: Intercultural Encounters and Frontier Imaginaries in Upland Southeast Asia,” Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 16, no. 4 (2015): 317–22.

30 Oliver Tappe, “Frontier in the Frontier: Sociopolitical Dynamics and Colonial Administration in the Lao-Vietnamese Borderlands,” Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 16, no. 4 (2015): 368–87; Tran Thi Ha Lan and Roy Huijsmans, “Experiencing the State and Negotiating Belonging in Zomia: Pa Koh and Bru-Van Kieu Ethnic Minority Youth in a Lao-Vietnamese Borderland,” in Children and Borders, ed. Christou Spyrou (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), 27–46; Vatthana Pholsena, “State Formation, Social Hierarchies, and Ethnic Dynamics: A Case from Upland Laos,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 41, no. 7 (2018): 1294–1311; Seb Rumsby, “Rumours, Sects and Rallies: The Ethnic Politics of Recent Hmong Millenarian Movements in Vietnam's Highlands,” Journal of Peasant Studies 46, no. 7 (2019): 1346–67.

31 Alessandro Rippa, “Zomia 2.0: Branding Remoteness and Neoliberal Connectivity in the Golden Triangle Special Economic Zone, Laos,” Social Anthropology 27, no. 2 (2019): 253–69.

32 Nicholas Herriman and Monika Winarnita, “Seeking the State: Appropriating Bureaucratic Symbolism and Wealth in the Margins of Southeast Asia,” Oceania 86, no. 2 (2016): 132–50.

33 Andrew May, “Homo in Nubibus: Colonisation and Political Order in the Khasi Hills of Northeast India,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 42, no. 1 (2014): 41–60.

34 B. G. Karlsson, “Evading the State: Ethnicity in Northeast India through the Lens of James Scott,” Asian Ethnology 72, no. 2 (2013): 321–33; Rrun Bennike, “Governing Landscapes: Territorialisation and Exchange at South Asia's Himalayan Frontier,” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 40, no. 2 (2017): 217–22.

35 Rila Mukherjee, “India's North-East: An Enigmatic Absence in History and Cartography,” in Playing with Nature: History and Politics of Environment in North-East India, ed. Sajal Nag (Abingdon: Routledge, 2018), 33–47.

36 Arik Moran, “God, King, and Subject: On the Development of Composite Political Cultures in the Western Himalaya, circa 1800–1900,” Journal of Asian Studies 78, no. 3 (2019): 577–600.

37 Daniel McMahon, “Were the Miao Kings ‘Prophets of Renewal’? The Case of the 1795–1797 Hunan Miao,” Frontiers of History in China 12, no. 2 (2017): 301–27.

38 Junxi Qian and XueQiong Tang, “Dilemma of Modernity: Interrogating Cross-Border Ethnic Identities in China's Southwest Frontier,” AREA 49, no. 1 (2017): 52–59; Jinba Tenzin, “Contesting Border/Frontier Studies in China and Beyond: The Prospects and Pitfalls of Zomia as a Metaphor,” Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review, no. 24 (2017): 192–99.

39 Pal Nyiri, “Enclaves of Improvement: Sovereignty and Developmentalism in the Special Zones of the China-Lao Borderlands,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 54, no. 3 (2010): 533–62; Guido Sprenger, “Transcultural Communication and Social Order Comparison in Upland Southeast Asia,” Asian Ethnology 72, no. 2 (2013): 299–319.

40 Barabantseva, Elena, “When Borders Lie Within: Ethnic Marriages and Illegality on the Sino-Vietnamese Frontier,” International Political Sociology 9, no. 4 (2015): 352–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Bergmann, Christoph, Himalayan Border Region: Trade, Identity and Mobility in Kumaon, India (Geneva: Springer, 2016), 1–21, 185–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 Sharma, Mahesh, “The Frayed Margins of Empire: Early Nineteenth Century Panjab and the Hill States,” Indian Economic and Social History Review 54, no. 4 (2017): 505–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Spacek, Michael, “Internal Borderlands: Architectures of Force and State Expansion in India's Central ‘Frontier,’” Conflict Security and Development 17, no. 2 (2017): 163–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Bliakher, L. E. and Bliakher, M. L., “Zomia on the Amur, or State Order against the Order Outside of State,” Politeia: Journal of Political Theory and Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics 88, no. 1 (2018): 148–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.