Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:25:53.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two-Sex Branching Processes with Offspring and Mating in a Random Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

S. Ma*
Affiliation:
Hebei University of Technology
M. Molina*
Affiliation:
University of Extremadura
*
Postal address: Department of Applied Mathematics, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China. Email address: [email protected]
∗∗Postal address: Department of Mathematics, University of Extremadura, 06071 Badajoz, Spain. Email address: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We introduce a class of discrete-time two-sex branching processes where the offspring probability distribution and the mating function are governed by an environmental process. It is assumed that the environmental process is formed by independent but not necessarily identically distributed random vectors. For such a class, we determine some relationships among the probability generating functions involved in the mathematical model and derive expressions for the main moments. Also, by considering different probabilistic approaches we establish several results concerning the extinction probability. A simulated example is presented as an illustration.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2009 

References

Agresti, A. (1975). On the extinction times of varying and random environment branching processes. J. Appl. Prob. 12, 3946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alsmeyer, G. and Rösler, U. (1996). The bisexual Galton–Watson process with promiscuous mating: extinction probabilities in the supercritical case. Ann. Appl. Prob. 6, 922939.Google Scholar
Alsmeyer, G. and Rösler, U. (2002). Asexual versus promiscuous bisexual Galton–Watson processes: the extinction probability ratio. Ann. Appl. Prob. 12, 125142.Google Scholar
Bagley, J. H. (1986). On the asymptotic properties of a supercritical bisexual branching process. J. Appl. Prob. 23, 820826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruss, F. T. (1984). A note on extinction criteria for bisexual Galton–Watson processes. J. Appl. Prob. 21, 915919.Google Scholar
Daley, D. J. (1968). Extinction conditions for certain bisexual Galton–Watson branching processes. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth. 9, 315322.Google Scholar
Daley, D. J., Hull, D. M. and Taylor, J. M. (1986). Bisexual Galton–Watson branching processes with superadditive mating functions. J. Appl. Prob. 23, 585600.Google Scholar
González, M., Molina, M. and Mota, M. (2000). Limit behaviour of a subcritical bisexual Galton–Watson branching process with immigration. Statist. Prob. Lett. 49, 1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, M., Molina, M. and Mota, M. (2001). On the limit behavior of a supercritical bisexual Galton–Watson branching process with immigration of mating units. Stoch. Anal. Appl. 19, 933945.Google Scholar
Haccou, P., Jagers, P. and Vatutin, V. A. (2007). Branching Processes: Variation, Growth, and Extinction of Populations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hille, E. and Phillips, R. S. (1957). Functional Analysis and Semi-Groups (Amer. Math. Soc. Coll. Publ. 31). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar
Holzheimer, J. (1984). φ-branching processes in a random environment. Zastos. Mat. 18, 351358.Google Scholar
Hull, D. M. (1982). A necessary condition for extinction in those bisexual Galton–Watson branching processes governed by superadditive mating functions. J. Appl. Prob. 19, 847850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. M. (2003). A survey of the literature associated with the bisexual Galton–Watson branching process. Extracta Math. 18, 321343.Google Scholar
Jagers, P. (1975). Branching Processes with Biological Applications. John Wiley, London.Google Scholar
Kimmel, M. and Axelrod, D. E. (2002). Branching Processes in Biology. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Ma, S. and Xing, Y. (2006). The asymptotic properties of supercritical bisexual Galton–Watson branching processes with immigration of mating units. Acta Math. Sci. B. 26, 603609.Google Scholar
Molina, M. and Yanev, N. (2003). Continuous time bisexual branching processes. C. R. Acad. Bulgare Sci. 56, 510.Google Scholar
Molina, M., Mota, M. and Ramos, A. (2002). Bisexual Galton–Watson branching process with population-size-dependent mating. J. Appl. Prob. 39, 479490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molina, M., Mota, M. and Ramos, A. (2003). Bisexual Galton–Watson branching process in varying environments. Stoch. Anal. Appl. 21, 13531367.Google Scholar
Molina, M., Mota, M. and Ramos, A. (2004a). Limiting behaviour for superadditive bisexual Galton–Watson process in varying environments. Test 13, 481499.Google Scholar
Molina, M., Mota, M. and Ramos, A. (2004b). Limit behaviour for a supercritical bisexual Galton–Watson branching process with population-size-dependent mating. Stoch. Process. Appl. 112, 309317.Google Scholar
Molina, M., Mota, M. and Ramos, A. (2006). On the L {α}-convergence (1≤α≤ 2) for a bisexual branching process with population-size dependent mating. Bernoulli 12, 457468.Google Scholar
Pakes, A. C. (2003). Biological applications of branching processes. In Stochastic Processes: Modelling and Simulation (Handbook Statist. 21), eds Shanbhag, D. N. and Rao, C. R., North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 693773.Google Scholar
Smith, W. L. and Wilkinson, W. E. (1969). On branching processes in random environments. Ann. Math. Statist. 40, 814827.Google Scholar
Xing, Y. and Wang, Y. (2005). On the extinction of a class of population-size-dependent bisexual branching processes. J. Appl. Prob. 42, 175184.Google Scholar
Yanev, G. P. and Yanev, N. M. (1990). Extinction of controlled branching processes in random environments. Math. Balkanica 4, 369380.Google Scholar