Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:04:50.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tools to Estimate the First Passage Time to a Convex Barrier

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Ola Hammarlid*
Affiliation:
Stockholm University
*
Postal address: Department of Mathematics, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. Email address: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The first passage time of a random walk to a barrier (constant or concave) is of great importance in many areas, such as insurance, finance, and sequential analysis. Here, we consider a sum of independent, identically distributed random variables and the convex barrier cb(n/c), where c is a scale parameter and n is time. It is shown, using large-deviation techniques, that the limit distribution of the first passage time decays exponentially in c. Under a tilt of measure, which changes the drift, four properties are proved: the limit distribution of the overshoot is distributed as an overshoot over a linear barrier; the stopping time is asymptotically normally distributed when it is properly normalized; the overshoot and the asymptotic normal part are asymptotically independent; and the overshoot over a linear barrier is bounded by an exponentially distributed random variable. The determination of the function that multiplies the exponential part is guided by consideration of these properties.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 2005 

References

Bucklew, J. A. (1990). Large Deviation Techniques in Decision, Simulation, and Estimation. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Chernoff, H. (1952). A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations. Ann. Math. Statist. 23, 493507.Google Scholar
Cramér, H. (1930). Mathematical risk. In Collected Works, ed. Martin-Löf, A., Springer, Berlin, 1994, p. 601.Google Scholar
Dembo, A. and Zeitouni, O. (1993). Large Deviations Techniques and Applications. Jones and Bartlett, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Dembo, A., Deuschel, J.-D. and Duffie, D. (2004). Large portfolio losses. Finance Stoch. 8, 316.Google Scholar
Durbin, J. (1992). The first-passage density of the Brownian motion process to a curved boundary. J. Appl. Prob. 29, 291304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferebee, B. (1982). The tangent approximation to one-sided Brownian exit densities. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth. 61, 309326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandell, J. (1991). Aspects of Risk Theory. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gut, A. (1974). On the moments and limit distributions of some first passage times. Ann. Prob. 2, 277308.Google Scholar
Gut, A. (1988). Stopped Random Walks. Limit Theorems and Applications. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Gut, A. (1992). First passage times for perturbed random walks. Sequent. Anal. 11, 149179.Google Scholar
Hammarlid, O. (2004). A large deviation estimate of the first passage time to a convex barrier. Work in progress.Google Scholar
Heyde, C. C. (1967). Asymptotic renewal results for a natural generalization of classical renewal theory. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 29, 141150.Google Scholar
Höglund, T. (1979). A unified formulation of the central limit theorem for small and large deviations from the mean. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth. 49, 105117.Google Scholar
Höglund, T. (1990). An asymptotic expression for the probability of ruin within finite time. Ann. Prob. 18, 378389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennen, C. (1985). Second-order approximations to the density, mean and variance of Brownian first-exit times. Ann. Prob. 13, 126144.Google Scholar
Jennen, C. and Lerche, H. R. (1981). First exit densities of Brownian motion through one-sided moving boundaries. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth. 55, 133148.Google Scholar
Lai, T. L. and Siegmund, D. (1977). A nonlinear renewal theory with applications to sequential analysis. Ann. Statist. 5, 946954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, T. L. and Siegmund, D. (1979). A nonlinear renewal theory with applications to sequential analysis. II. Ann. Statist. 7, 6076.Google Scholar
Larsson-Cohn, L. (2001). Some remarks on “First passage times for perturbed random walks”. Sequent. Anal. 20, 8790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, F. (1926). Försäkringsteknisk Riskutjämning. F. Englunds boktryckeri AB, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Martin-Löf, A. (1986). Entropy estimates for the first passage time of a random walk to a time dependent barrier. Scand. J. Statist. 13, 221229.Google Scholar
Rényi, A. (1957). On the asymptotic distribution of the sum of a random number of independent random variables. Acta Math. Hung. 8, 193199.Google Scholar
Roberts, G. O. and Shortland, C. F. (1995). The hazard rate tangent approximation for boundary hitting times. Ann. Appl. Prob. 5, 446460.Google Scholar
Rolski, T., Schmidli, H., Schmidt, V. and Teugels, J. (1999). Stochastic Processes for Insurance and Finance. John Wiley, Chichester.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segerdahl, C.-O. (1955). When does ruin occur in the collective theory of risk? Skand. Aktuarietidskr. 38, 2236.Google Scholar
Siegmund, D. (1982). Large deviations for boundary crossing probabilities. Ann. Prob. 10, 581588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegmund, D. (1985). Sequential Analysis. Tests and Confidence Intervals. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Stam, A. J. (1967). Two theorems in r-dimensional renewal theory. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth. 10, 8186.Google Scholar
Von Bahr, B. (1974). Ruin probabilities expressed in terms of ladder height distributions. Scand. Actuarial J., 190204.Google Scholar
Woodroofe, M. (1976). A renewal theorem for curved boundaries and moments of first passage times. Ann. Prob. 4, 6780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodroofe, M. (1982). Nonlinear Renewal Theory in Sequential Analysis (CBMS-NSF Regional Conf. Ser. Appl. Math. 39). SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar