Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:25:28.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stochastic Brownian Game of Absolute Dominance

Part of: Stochastic systems and control Stochastic processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2016

Shangzhen Luo
Shangzhen Luo*
Affiliation:
University of Northern Iowa
*
∗ Postal address: Department of Mathematics, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614-0506, USA. Email address: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we study a reinsurance game between two insurers whose surplus processes are modeled by arithmetic Brownian motions. We assume a minimax criterion in the game. One insurer tries to maximize the probability of absolute dominance while the other tries to minimize it through reinsurance control. Here absolute dominance is defined as the event that liminf of the difference of the surplus levels tends to -∞. Under suitable parameter conditions, the game is solved with the value function and the Nash equilibrium strategy given in explicit form.

Keywords

Stochastic differential gameNash equilibriumdiffusion approximationreinsuranceabsolute dominance

MSC classification

Primary: 60G40: Stopping times; optimal stopping problems; gambling theory
Secondary: 93E20: Optimal stochastic control
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 436 - 452
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 

References

Browne, S. (2000). Stochastic differential portfolio games. J. Appl. Prob. 37, 126–147.Google Scholar
Emanuel, D. C., Harrison, J. M. and Taylor, A. J. (1975). A diffusion approximation for the ruin function of a risk process with compounding assets. Scand. Actuarial J. 1975, 240–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, W. H. and Souganidis, P. E. (1989). On the existence of value functions of two-player, zero-sum stochastic differential games. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 38, 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, S. and Taksar, M. (2011). On absolute ruin minimization under a diffusion approximation model. Insurance Math. Econom. 48, 123–133.Google Scholar
Mataramvura, S. and Øksendal, B. (2008). Risk minimizing portfolios and HJBI equations for stochastic differential games. Stochastics 80, 317–337.Google Scholar
Schmidli, H. (1994). Diffusion approximations for a risk process with the possibility of borrowing and investment. Commun. Statist. Stoch. Models 10, 365–388.Google Scholar
Taksar, M. and Markussen, C. (2003). Optimal dynamic reinsurance policies for large insurance portfolios. Finance Stoch. 7, 97–121 Google Scholar
Taksar, M. and Zeng, X. (2011). Optimal non-proportional reinsurance control and stochastic differential games. Insurance Math. Econom. 48, 64–71.Google Scholar
Zeng, X. (2010). A stochastic differential reinsurance game. J. Appl. Prob. 47, 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar