Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:07:33.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spectrally Negative Lévy Processes Perturbed by Functionals of their Running Supremum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2018

Andreas E. Kyprianou*
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Curdin Ott*
Affiliation:
University of Bath
*
Postal address: Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Postal address: Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the setting of the classical Cramér–Lundberg risk insurance model, Albrecher and Hipp (2007) introduced the idea of tax payments. More precisely, if X = {Xt: t≥ 0} represents the Cramér–Lundberg process and, for all t≥ 0, St=sup_{st}Xs, then Albrecher and Hipp studied Xt - γ St,t≥ 0, where γ∈(0,1) is the rate at which tax is paid. This model has been generalised to the setting that X is a spectrally negative Lévy process by Albrecher, Renaud and Zhou (2008). Finally, Kyprianou and Zhou (2009) extended this model further by allowing the rate at which tax is paid with respect to the process S = {St: t≥ 0} to vary as a function of the current value of S. Specifically, they considered the so-called perturbed spectrally negative Lévy process, Ut:=Xt -∫(0,t]γ(S_u)dSu,t≥ 0, under the assumptions that γ:[0,∞)→ [0,1) and ∫0 (1-γ(s))d s =∞. In this article we show that a number of the identities in Kyprianou and Zhou (2009) are still valid for a much more general class of rate functions γ:[0,∞)→∝. Moreover, we show that, with appropriately chosen γ, the perturbed process can pass continuously (i.e. creep) into (-∞, 0) in two different ways.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 

References

Albrecher, H. and Hipp, C. (2007). Lundberg's risk process with tax. Blätter DGVFM 28, 1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecher, H., Renaud, J.-F. and Zhou, X. (2008). A Lévy insurance risk process with tax. J. Appl. Prob. 45, 363375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avram, F., Kyprianou, A. E. and Pistorius, M. R. (2004). Exit problems for spectrally negative Lévy processes and applications to (Canadized) Russian options. Ann. Appl. Prob. 14, 215238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoin, J. (1996). Lévy Processes. Cambrdige University Press.Google Scholar
Bichteler, K. (2002). Stochastic Integration with Jumps. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuznetsov, A., Kyprianou, A. E. and Rivero, V. (2012). The theory of scale functions for spectrally negative Lévy processes. In Lévy Matters II (Lecture Notes Math. 2061), Springer, Berlin, pp. 97186.Google Scholar
Kyprianou, A. E. and Zhou, X. (2009). General tax structures and the Lévy insurance risk model. J. Appl. Prob. 46, 11461156.Google Scholar
Kyprianou, A. E. (2006). Introductory Lectures on Fluctuations of Lévy Processes with Applications. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Perman, M. and Werner, W. (1997). Perturbed Brownian motions. Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 108, 357383.Google Scholar