Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:46:56.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simple ratio prophet inequalities for a mortal with multiple choices

Part of: Distribution theory - Probability Stochastic processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

David Assaf  and
Ester Samuel-Cahn
David Assaf*
Affiliation:
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Ester Samuel-Cahn*
Affiliation:
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
*
∗ Postal address: Department of Statistics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel.
∗ Postal address: Department of Statistics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let Xi ≥ 0 be independent, i = 1,…, n, with known distributions and let Xn*= max(X1,…,Xn). The classical ‘ratio prophet inequality’ compares the return to a prophet, which is EXn*, to that of a mortal, who observes the Xis sequentially, and must resort to a stopping rule t. The mortal's return is V(X1,…,Xn) = max EXt, where the maximum is over all stopping rules. The classical inequality states that EXn* < 2V(X1,…,Xn). In the present paper the mortal is given k ≥ 1 chances to choose. If he uses stopping rules t1,…,tk his return is E(max(Xt1,…,Xtk)). Let t(b) be the ‘simple threshold stopping rule’ defined to be the smallest i for which Xi ≥ b, or n if there is no such i. We show that there always exists a proper choice of k thresholds, such that EXn* ≤ ((k+1)/k)Emax(Xt1,…,Xtk)), where ti is of the form t(bi) with some added randomization. Actually the thresholds can be taken to be thej/(k+1) percentile points of the distribution of Xn*, j = 1,…,k, and hence only knowledge of the distribution of Xn* is needed.

Keywords

Optimal stopping rulesratio prophet inequalitysimple threshold rulemultiple stopping options

MSC classification

Primary: 60G40: Stopping times; optimal stopping problems; gambling theory
Secondary: 60E15: Inequalities; stochastic orderings
Type
Short Communications
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 1084 - 1091
Copyright
Copyright © by the Applied Probability Trust 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hill, T. P., and Kertz, R. P. (1981). Ratio comparisons of supremum and stop rule expectation. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth. 56, 283–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. P. (1987). Prophet-type inequalities for multi-choice optimal stopping. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 24, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krengel, U., and Sucheston, L. (1978). On semiamarts, amarts, and processes with finite value. In Probability on Banach Spaces (Adv. Prob. Rel. Topics 4), ed. Kuelbs, J. Dekker, New York, pp. 197–266.Google Scholar
Rinott, Y., and Samuel-Cahn, E. (1987). Comparison of optimal stopping values and prophet inequalities for negatively dependent random variables. Ann. Statist. 15, 1482–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuel-Cahn, E. (1984). Comparison of threshold stop rules and maximum for independent nonnegative random variables. Ann. Prob. 12, 1213–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittman, R. (1995). Prophet inequalities for dependent random variables. Stoch. Stoch. Rep. 52, 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar