Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:49:55.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shortfall Risk Approximations for American Options in the Multidimensional Black-Scholes Model

Part of: Limit theorems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Yan Dolinsky
Yan Dolinsky*
Affiliation:
ETH Zürich
*
∗Postal address: Department of Mathematics, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland. Email address: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We show that shortfall risks of American options in a sequence of multinomial approximations of the multidimensional Black-Scholes (BS) market converge to the corresponding quantities for similar American options in the multidimensional BS market with path-dependent payoffs. In comparison to previous papers we consider the multiassets case for which we use the weak convergence approach.

Keywords

American optionshortfall riskweak convergence

MSC classification

Secondary: 60F05: Central limit and other weak theorems
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 997 - 1012
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2010 

References

[1] Aldous, D. (1981). Weak convergence of stochastic processes for processes viewed in the strasbourg manner. Unpublished manuscript, Statistics Laboratory, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
[2] Billingsley, P. (1968). Convergence of Probability Measures. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
[3] Dolinsky, Y. (2010). Applications of weak convergence for hedging of game options. Ann. Appl. Prob. 20, 1891–1906.Google Scholar
[4] Dolinsky, Y. and Kifer, Y. (2007). Hedging with risk for game options in discrete time. Stochastics 79, 169–195.Google Scholar
[5] Dolinsky, Y. and Kifer, Y. (2008). Binomial approximations of shortfall risk for game options. Ann. Appl. Prob. 18, 1737–1770.Google Scholar
[6] Dolinsky, Y. and Kifer, Y. (2010). Binomial approximations for barrier options of Israeli style. To appear in Ann. Dynamic Games.Google Scholar
[7] Dudley, R. M. (1968). Distances of probability measures and random variables. Ann. Math. Statist. 39, 1563–1572.Google Scholar
[8] He, H. (1990). Convergence from discrete to continuous time contingent claim prices. Rev. Financial Studies 3, 523–546.Google Scholar
[9] Jakubowski, A. and Slominski, L. (1986). Extended convergence to continuous in probability processes with independent increments. Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 72, 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Kifer, Y. (2000). Game options. Finance Stoch. 4, 443–463.Google Scholar
[11] Liptser, R. S. H. and Shiryaev, A. N. (2001). Statistics of Random Processes. I. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
[12] Meyer, P.-A. and Zheng, W. A. (1984). Tightness criteria for laws of semimartingales. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Prob. Statist. 20, 353–372.Google Scholar
[13] Mulinacci, S. (2010). The efficient hedging problem for American options. To appear in Finance Stoch.Google Scholar
[14] Peskir, G. and Shiryaev, A. (2006). Optimal Stopping and Free-Boundary Problems. Birkhauser, Basel.Google Scholar
[15] Shiryaev, A. N. (1999). Essentials of Stochastic Finance. World Scientific, River Edge, NJ.Google Scholar