Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:18:31.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reliability assessment of system under a generalized run shock model

Part of: Markov processes Systems theory and control: General

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2019

Min Gong ,
Min Xie  and
Yaning Yang
Min Gong*
Affiliation:
University of Science and Technology of China City University of Hong Kong
Min Xie*
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong
Yaning Yang*
Affiliation:
University of Science and Technology of China
*
* Postal address: Shenzhen Research Institute, City University of Hong Kong, 8 Yuexing First Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. Email address: [email protected]
** Postal address: Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Hong Kong, China. Email address: [email protected]
*** Postal address: Department of Statistics and Finance, University of Science and Technology of China, 96 Jinzhai Road, 9 Hefei, Anhui, China. Email address: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we are concerned with modelling the reliability of a system subject to external shocks. In a run shock model, the system fails when a sequence of shocks above a threshold arrive in succession. Nevertheless, using a single threshold to measure the severity of a shock is too critical in real practice. To this end, we develop a generalized run shock model with two thresholds. We employ a phase-type distribution to model the damage size and the inter-arrival time of shocks, which is highly versatile and may be used to model many quantitative features of random phenomenon. Furthermore, we use the Markovian property to construct a multi-state system which degrades with the arrival of shocks. We also provide a numerical example to illustrate our results.

Keywords

Run shock modelphase-type distributionMarkov chainreliability functioninter-arrival timemean residual life

MSC classification

Primary: 93A30: Mathematical modeling (models of systems, model-matching, etc.)
Secondary: 60J28: Applications of continuous-time Markov processes on discrete state spaces
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 1249 - 1260
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2018 

References

[1]Cha, J. H. and Finkelstein, M. (2011). On new classes of extreme shock models and some generalizations. J. Appl. Prob. 48, 258–270.Google Scholar
[2]Eryilmaz, S. (2013). On the lifetime behavior of a discrete time shock model. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 237, 384–388.Google Scholar
[3]Eryilmaz, S. (2015). Assessment of a multi-state system under a shock model. Appl. Math. Comput. 269, 1–8.Google Scholar
[4]Eryilmaz, S. (2015). Dynamic assessment of multi-state systems using phase-type modeling. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 140, 71–77.Google Scholar
[5]Eryilmaz, S. (2016). Compound Markov negative binomial distribution. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 292, 1–6.Google Scholar
[6]Goonewardene, S. S., Phull, J. S. B. A. and Persad, R. A. (2014). Interpretation of PSA levels after radical therapy for prostate cancer. Tr. Urol. Mens Health 5, 30–34.Google Scholar
[7]Gut, A. (1990). Cumulative shock models. Adv. Appl. Prob. 22, 504–507.Google Scholar
[8]Gut, A. (2001). Mixed shock models. Bernoulli 7, 541–555.Google Scholar
[9]He, Q.-M. (2014). Fundamentals of Matrix-Analytic Methods. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
[10]Lin, Y. H., Li, Y. F. and Zio, E. (2016). Reliability assessment of systems subject to dependent degradation processes and random shocks. IIE Trans. 48, 1072–1085.Google Scholar
[11]Mallor, F., Omey, E. and Santos, J. (2006). Asymptotic results for a run and cumulative mixed shock model. J. Math. Sci. 138, 5410–5414.Google Scholar
[12]Montoro-Cazorla, D. and Pérez-Ocón, R. (2006). Replacement times and costs in a degrading system with several types of failure: the case of phase-type holding times. Europ. J. Operat. Res. 175, 1193–1209.Google Scholar
[13]Peng, D., Fang, L. and Tong, C. (2013). A multi-state reliability analysis of single-component repairable system based on phase-type distribution. In Proc. Int. Conf. Management Science and Engineering. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 496–501.Google Scholar
[14]Peng, R., Zhai, Q. Q. and Levitin, G. (2016). Defending a single object against an attacker trying to detect a subset of false targets. Reliab. Eng. System Safety 149, 137–147.Google Scholar
[15]Segovia, M. C. and Labeau, P. E. (2013). Reliability of a multi-state system subject to shocks using phase-type distributions.Appl. Math. Model. 37, 4883–4904.Google Scholar
[16]Shrestha, A., Xing, L. and Dai, Y. (2011). Reliability analysis of multistate phased-mission systems with unordered and ordered states. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cyb. A 41, 625–636.Google Scholar
[17]Yingkui, G. and Jing, L. (2012). Multi-state system reliability: a new and systematic review. Procedia Engineer. 29, 531–536.Google Scholar
[18]Zhou, X., Wu, C. Y., Li, Y. and Xi, L. (2106). A preventive maintenance model for leased equipment subject to internal degradation and external shock damage. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 154, 1–7.Google Scholar