Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:11:12.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Uniqueness of Martingales with Certain Prescribed Marginals

Part of: Mathematical economics Stochastic processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2018

Michael R. Tehranchi
Michael R. Tehranchi*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
*
∗ Postal address: Statistical Laboratory, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WB, UK. Email address: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This note contains two main results. (i) (Discrete time) Suppose that S is a martingale whose marginal laws agree with a geometric simple random walk. (In financial terms, let S be a risk-neutral asset price and suppose that the initial option prices agree with the Cox-Ross-Rubinstein binomial tree model.) Then S is a geometric simple random walk. (ii) (Continuous time) Suppose that S=S0eσ X-σ2〈 X〉/2 is a continuous martingale whose marginal laws agree with a geometric Brownian motion. (In financial terms, let S be a risk-neutral asset price and suppose that the initial option prices agree with the Black-Scholes model with volatility σ>0.) Then there exists a Brownian motion W such that Xt=Wt+o(t1/4+ ε) as t↑∞ for any ε> 0.

Keywords

Fake Brownian motionbinomial tree modelgeometric Brownian motionweak convergence to Brownian motion

MSC classification

Primary: 60G42: Martingales with discrete parameter 60G44: Martingales with continuous parameter 91B25: Asset pricing models
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 557 - 575
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 

References

Albin, J. M. P. (2008). A continuous non-Brownian motion martingale with Brownian motion marginal distributions. Statist. Prob. Lett. 78, 682–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billingsley, P. (1999). Convergence of Probability Measures, 2nd end. John Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmona, R. and Nadtochiy, S. (2009). Local volatility dynamic models. Finance Stoch. 13, 1–48.Google Scholar
Carmona, R. and Nadtochiy, S. (2012). Tangent Lévy market models. Finance Stoch. 16, 63–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J. C., Ross, S. A. and Rubinstein, M. (1979). Option pricing: a simplified approach. J. Financial Econom. 7, 229–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derman, E. and Kani, I. (1994). The volatility smile and its implied tree. Goldman Sachs Quantitative Strategies Research Notes.Google Scholar
Dupire, B. (1994). Pricing with a smile. Risk 7, 32–39.Google Scholar
Durrleman, V. (2008). Convergence of at-the-money implied volatilities to the spot volatility. J. Appl. Prob. 45, 542–550.Google Scholar
Filipović, D. (2001). Consistency Problems for Heath–Jarrow–Morton Interest Rate Models (Lecture Notes Math. 1760). Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hamza, K. and Klebaner, F. C. (2007). A family of non-Gaussian martingales with Gaussian marginals. J. Appl. Math. Stoch. Anal. 2007, article ID 92723, 19 pp.Google Scholar
Heath, D., Jarrow, R. and Morton, A. (1992). Bond pricing and the term structure of interest rates: a new methodology for contingent claims valuation. Econometrica 60, 77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, J. C. and White, A. (1990). Pricing interest-rate-derivative securities. Rev. Financial Studies 3, 573–592.Google Scholar
Kallsen, J. and Krühner, P. (2010). On a Heath–Jarrow–Morton approach for stock options. Preprint.Google Scholar
Kellerer, H. G. (1972). Markov-Komposition und eine Anwendung auf Martingale. Math. Ann. 198, 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunita, H. (1997). Stochastic Flows and Stochastic Differential Equations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Madan, D. B. and Yor, M. (2002). Making Markov martingales meet marginals: with explicit constructions. Bernoulli 8, 509–536.Google Scholar
Musiela, M. (1993). Stochastic PDEs and term structure models. In Journées Internationales de Finance, IGR-AFFI, La Baule.Google Scholar
Oleszkiewicz, K. (2008). On fake Brownian motions. Statist. Prob. Lett. 78, 1251–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, L. C. G. (2009). A martingale with binomial marginals is a simple random walk. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Schweizer, M. and Wissel, J. (2006). Term structures of implied volatilities: absence of arbitrage and existence results. Math. Finance 18, 77–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweizer, M. and Wissel, J. (2008). Arbitrage-free market models for option prices: the multi-strike case. Finance Stoch. 12, 469–505.Google Scholar
Tehranchi, M. R. (2009). Symmetric martingales and symmetric smiles. Stoch. Process. Appl. 119, 3785–3797.Google Scholar
Xu, X. (2011). Fake geometric Brownian motion and its option pricing. MSc Thesis, Oxford University.Google Scholar