Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:33:07.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Monitoring Error of the Supremum of a Normal Jump Diffusion Process

Part of: Probabilistic methods, simulation and stochastic differential equations Stochastic processes Mathematical finance Markov processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Ao Chen ,
Liming Feng  and
Renming Song
Ao Chen*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Liming Feng*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Renming Song*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
*
∗ Postal address: Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
∗∗∗ Postal address: Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. Email address: [email protected]
∗ Postal address: Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We derive an expansion for the (expected) difference between the continuously monitored supremum and evenly monitored discrete maximum over a finite time horizon of a jump diffusion process with independent and identically distributed normal jump sizes. The monitoring error is of the form a 0 / N 1/2 + a 1 / N 3/2 + · · · + b 1 / N + b 2 / N 2 + b 4 / N 4 + · · ·, where N is the number of monitoring intervals. We obtain explicit expressions for the coefficients {a 0, a 1, …, b 1, b 2, …}. In particular, a 0 is proportional to the value of the Riemann zeta function at ½, a well-known fact that has been observed for Brownian motion in applied probability and mathematical finance.

Keywords

Normal jump diffusion processsupremumdiscrete monitoringSpitzer's identityEuler-Maclaurin formulaRiemann zeta functionLerch transcendent

MSC classification

Secondary: 60G51: Processes with independent increments; L'evy processes 60J75: Jump processes 91G60: Numerical methods (including Monte Carlo methods) 65C20: Models, numerical methods
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 1021 - 1034
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2011 

Footnotes

Research partially supported by the National Science Foundation, under grants CMMI-0927367 and CMMI-1029846.

References

[1] Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A. (1964). Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
[2] Asmussen, S., Glynn, P. and Pitman, J. (1995). Discretization error in simulation of one-dimensional reflecting Brownian motion. Ann. Appl. Prob. 5, 875–896.Google Scholar
[3] Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Political Econom. 81, 637–654.Google Scholar
[4] Boyarchenko, S. I. and Levendorskii, S. Z. (2002). Non-Gaussian Merton–Black–Scholes Theory. World Scientific, River Edge, NJ.Google Scholar
[5] Broadie, M., Glasserman, P. and Kou, S. G. (1999). Connecting discrete and continuous path-dependent options. Finance Stoch. 3, 55–82.Google Scholar
[6] Calvin, J. M. (1995). Average performance of passive algorithms for global optimization. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 191, 608–617.Google Scholar
[7] Cont, R. and Tankov, P. (2004). Financial Modelling with Jump Processes. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
[8] Dahlquist, G. and Björck, Å. (2008). Numerical Methods in Scientific Computing, Vol. I. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathemetics, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
[9] Erdelyi, A., Magnus, W., Oberhettinger, F. and Tricomi, F. (1953). Higher Transcendental Functions, Vol. I. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
[10] Feng, L. and Linetsky, V. (2008). Pricing discretely monitored barrier options and defaultable bonds in Lévy process models: a fast Hilbert transform approach. Math. Finance 18, 337–384.Google Scholar
[11] Feng, L. and Linetsky, V. (2009). Computing exponential moments of the discrete maximum of a Lévy process and lookback options. Finance Stoch. 13, 501–529.Google Scholar
[12] Gould, H. W. (1972). Explicit formulas for Bernoulli numbers. Amer. Math. Monthly 79, 44–51.Google Scholar
[13] Janssen, A. J. and, E. M. van Leeuwaarden, J. S. H., (2007). On Lerch's transcendent and the Gaussian random walk. Ann. Appl. Prob. 17, 421–439.Google Scholar
[14] Janssen, A. J. and, E. M. van Leeuwaarden, J. S. H., (2009). Equidistant sampling for the maximum of a Brownian motion with drift on a finite horizon. Electron. Commun. Prob. 14, 143–150.Google Scholar
[15] Jeannin, M. and Pistorius, M. (2010). A transform approach to compute prices and greeks of barrier options driven by a class of Lévy processes. Quant. Finance 10, 629–644.Google Scholar
[16] Kou, S. G. (2008). Discrete barrier and lookback options. In Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 15, eds Birge, J. and Linetsky, V., pp. 343–373.Google Scholar
[17] Kou, S. G. and Wang, H. (2004). Option pricing under a double exponential Jump diffusion model. Manag. Sci. 50, 1178–1192.Google Scholar
[18] Kudryavtsev, O. and Levendorskii, S. (2009). Fast and accurate pricing of barrier options under Lévy processes. Finance Stoch. 13, 531–562.Google Scholar
[19] Kuznetsov, A., Kyprianou, A., Pardo, J. and van Schaik, K. (2010). A Wiener-Hopf Monte-Carlo simulation technique for Lévy processes. Working paper.Google Scholar
[20] Merton, R. C. (1973). Theory of rational option pricing. Bell J. Econom. Manag. Sci. 4, 141–183.Google Scholar
[21] Merton, R. C. (1976). Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous. J. Financial Econom. 3, 125–144.Google Scholar
[22] Petrella, G. and Kou, S. (2004). Numerical pricing of discrete barrier and lookback options via Laplace transforms. J. Comput. Finance 8, 1–37.Google Scholar
[23] Schoutens, W. (2003). Lévy Processes in Finance: Pricing Financial Derivatives. John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
[24] Spitzer, F. (1956). A combinatorial lemma and its application to probability theory. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 82, 323–339.Google Scholar