Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T01:37:05.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the asymptotic distribution of the size of a stochastic epidemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Thomas Sellke
Thomas Sellke*
Affiliation:
Purdue University
*
∗ Postal address: Department of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For a stochastic epidemic of the type considered by Bailey [1] and Kendall [3], Daniels [2] showed that ‘when the threshold is large but the population size is much larger, the distribution of the number remaining uninfected in a large epidemic has approximately the Poisson form.' A simple, intuitive proof is given for this result without use of Daniels's assumption that the original number of infectives is ‘small'. The proof is based on a construction of the epidemic process which is more explicit than the usual description.

Keywords

LIMITING POISSON DISTRIBUTIONSTOCHASTIC EPIDEMIC
Type
Short Communications
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 1983 , pp. 390 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1983 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Bailey, N. T. J. (1975) The Mathematical Theory of Infectious Diseases and its Applications. Griffin, London.Google Scholar
[2] Daniels, H. E. (1967) The distribution of the total size of an epidemic. Proc. 5th Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Prob. 4, 281–293.Google Scholar
[3] Kendall, D. G. (1956) Deterministic and stochastic epidemics in closed populations. Proc. 3rd Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Prob. 4, 149–165.Google Scholar
[4] Nagaev, A. V. and Startsev, A. N. (1970) The asymptotic analysis of a stochastic model of an epidemic. Theory Prob. Appl. 15, 98–107.Google Scholar