Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:24:16.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Stochastic Predictions of Failure Processes Under Population Heterogeneity

Part of: Special processes Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2018

Ji Hwan Cha
Ji Hwan Cha*
Affiliation:
Ewha Womans University
*
∗ Postal address: Department of Statistics, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 120-750, Korea. Email address: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In reliability a number of failure processes for repairable items are described by point processes, depending on the types of repairs being performed on failures of items. In this paper we describe the failure processes of repairable items from heterogeneous populations and study the stochastic predictions of future processes which utilize the failure/repair history. Two types of repair processes, perfect and minimal repair processes, will be considered. The results will be derived under a general stochastic formulation/setting. Applications of the obtained results to many different areas will be discussed and, specifically, some reliability applications will be illustrated in detail.

Keywords

Failure processrepairable itemheterogeneous populationstochastic predictionprocess historystochastic intensity

MSC classification

Primary: 60K10: Applications (reliability, demand theory, etc.)
Secondary: 62P30: Applications in engineering and industry
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 810 - 826
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 

References

Aven, T. and Jensen, U. (1999). Stochastic Models in Reliability. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aven, T. and Jensen, U. (2000). A general minimal repair model. J. Appl. Prob. 37, 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badı´a, F. G.. (2011). Hazard rate properties of a general counting process stopped at an independent random time. J. Appl. Prob. 48, 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badı´a, F. G. and Sanggüessa, C. (2008). Preservation of reliability classes under mixtures of renewal processes. Prob. Eng. Inf. Sci. 22, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhm, W. and Mohanty, S. G. (1994). Transient analysis of queues with heterogeneous arrivals. Queueing Systems 18, 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cha, J. H. (2000). On a better burn-in procedure. J. Appl. Prob. 37, 1099–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cha, J. H. and Finkelstein, M. (2011). Stochastic intensity for minimal repairs in heterogeneous populations. J. Appl. Prob. 48, 868–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cha, J. H. and Lee, E. Y. (2011). A stochastic breakdown model for an unreliable web server system and optimal admission control policy. J. Appl. Prob. 48, 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, D. R. (1962). Renewal Theory. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Esary, J. D., Marshall, A. W. and Proschan, F. (1973). Shock models and wear processes. Ann. Prob. 1, 627–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, M. S. (1992). Some notes on two types of minimal repair. Adv. Appl. Prob. 24, 226–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, M. S. (2004). Minimal repair in heterogeneous populations. J. Appl. Prob. 41, 281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, M. (2008). Failure Rate Modelling for Reliability and Risk. Springer, London.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, M. (2009). Understanding the shape of the mixture failure rate (with engineering and demographic applications). Appl. Stoch. Models Business Industry 25, 643–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, D. A. (1962). Poisson processes with random arrival rate. Ann. Math. Statist. 33, 924–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandell, J. (1997). Mixed Poisson Processes. Chapman and Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingman, J. F. C. (1964). On the doubly stochastic Poisson processes. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 60, 923–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mi, J. (1994). Burn-in and maintenance policies. Adv. Appl. Prob. 26, 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molchan, G. M. (1990). Strategies in strong earthquake prediction. Phys. Earth Planetary Interiors 61, 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molchan, G. M. (1997). Earthquake prediction as a decision-making problem. Pure Appl. Geophys. 149, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, S. C. (1980). A single server queueing loss model with heterogeneous arrival and service. Operat. Res. 28, 584–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rausand, M. and Høyland, A. (2004). System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications, 2nd edn. John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
Werner, M. J., Ide, K. and Sornette, D. (2011). Earthquake forecasting based on data assimilation: sequential Monte Carlo methods for renewal point processes. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 18, 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yechiali, U. and Naor, P. (1971). Queuing problems with heterogeneous arrivals and service. Operat. Res. 19, 722–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar