Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:10:54.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On effects of discretization on estimators of drift parameters for diffusion processes

Part of: Probabilistic methods, simulation and stochastic differential equations Inference from stochastic processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

P. E. Kloeden ,
E. Platen ,
H. Schurz  and
M. Sørensen
P. E. Kloeden*
Affiliation:
Deakin University
E. Platen*
Affiliation:
Australian National University
H. Schurz*
Affiliation:
Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics, Berlin
M. Sørensen*
Affiliation:
Aarhus University
*
∗Postal address: School of Computing and Mathematics, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3217, Australia.
∗∗Postal address: Centre for Financial Mathematics, School of Mathematical Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
∗∗∗Postal address: Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics, Berlin, Germany.
∗∗∗∗Postal address: Department of Theoretical Statistics, Institute of Mathematics, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper statistical properties of estimators of drift parameters for diffusion processes are studied by modern numerical methods for stochastic differential equations. This is a particularly useful method for discrete time samples, where estimators can be constructed by making discrete time approximations to the stochastic integrals appearing in the maximum likelihood estimators for continuously observed diffusions. A review is given of the necessary theory for parameter estimation for diffusion processes and for simulation of diffusion processes. Three examples are studied.

Keywords

DISCRETE TIME SAMPLINGINFERENCE FOR STOCHASTIC PROCESSESMAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATIONNUMERICAL METHODSSIMULATIONSTOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONSSTOCHASTIC TAYLOR EXPANSIONS

MSC classification

Primary: 65C99: None of the above, but in this section
Secondary: 62M05: Markov processes
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 1061 - 1076
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basawa, I. V. and Prakasa Rao, B. L. S. (1980) Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Bibby, B. M. and Sørensen, M. (1995) Martingale estimation functions for discretely observed diffusion processes. Bernoulli 1, 17–39.Google Scholar
Clark, J. M. C. (1982) An efficient approximation scheme for a class of stochastic differential equations. Springer Lecture Notes in Control and Information Science 42, 69–78.Google Scholar
Dacunha-Castelle, D. and Florens-Zmirou, D. (1986) Estimation of the coefficients of a diffusion from discrete observations. Stochastics 19, 263–284.Google Scholar
Florens-Zmirou, D. (1989) Approximate discrete-time schemes for statistics of diffusion processes. Statistics 20, 547–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florens-Zmirou, D. (1993) On estimating the diffusion coefficient from discrete observations. J Appl. Prob. 30, 790–804.Google Scholar
Genon-Catalot, V. (1990) Maximum contrast estimation for diffusion processes from discrete observations. Statistics 21, 99–116.Google Scholar
Genon-Catalot, V. and Jacod, J. (1993) On the estimation of the diffusion coefficient for multidimensional diffusion processes. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 29, 119–151.Google Scholar
Godambe, V. P. and Heyde, C. C. (1987) Quasi-likelihood and optimal estimation. Int. Statist. Rev. 55, 231–244.Google Scholar
Heyde, C. C. (1994) A quasi-likelihood approach to estimating parameters of diffusion processes. J. Appl. Prob. 31A, 283–290.Google Scholar
Hutton, J. ?. and Nelson, P. I. (1986) Quasi-likelihood estimation for semimartingales. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 22, 245–257.Google Scholar
Kasonga, R. A. (1988) The consistency of a non-linear least squares estimator for diffusion processes. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 30, 263–275.Google Scholar
Kazimierczyk, P. (1989) Consistent ML estimator for drift parameters of both ergodic and nonergodic diffusions. Springer Lecture Notes in Control and Information Science 136, 318–327.Google Scholar
Kazimierczyk, P. (1992) Explicit correction formulae for parametric identification of stochastic differential systems. Math. Comp. Simul. Google Scholar
Kloeden, P. E. and Platen, E. (1989) A survey of numerical methods for stochastic differential equations. Stoch. Hydrol. Hydraul. 3, 155–178.Google Scholar
Kloeden, P. E. and Platen, E. (1991) Stratonovich and Ito stochastic Taylor expansions. Math. Nachr. 151, 33–50.Google Scholar
Kloeden, P. ?. and Platen, ?. (1992) The Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloeden, P. E., Platen, E. and Wright, T. (1992) The approximation of multiple stochastic integrals. J Stoch. Anal. Appl. 10, 431–441.Google Scholar
Küchler, U. and Sørensen, M. (1989) Exponential families of stochastic processes: A unifying semimartingale approach. Int. Statist. Rev. 57, 123–144.Google Scholar
Küchler, U. and Sørensen, M. (1994) Exponential families of stochastic processes with time-continuous likelihood function. Scand. J. Statist. 21, 421–431.Google Scholar
Kutoyants, Yu. A. (1984) Parameter Estimation for Stochastic Processes. Heldermann, Berlin.Google Scholar
Le Breton, A. (1976) On continuous and discrete sampling for parameter estimation in diffusion type processes. Math. Prog. Stud. 5, 124–144.Google Scholar
Milstein, G.N. (1974) Approximate integration of stochastic differential equations. Theory Prob. Appl. 19, 557–562.Google Scholar
Newton, N. (1986) An asymptotically efficient difference formula for solving stochastic differential equations. Stochastics 19, 175–206.Google Scholar
Pardoux, E. and Talay, D. (1985) Discretization and simulation of stochastic differential equations. Acta Appl. Math. 3, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, A. R. (1994) A new approach to maximum likelihood estimation for stochastic differential equations based on discrete observation. Scand. J. Statist. 22, 55–71.Google Scholar
Platen, E. (1981) An approximation method for a class of Ito processes. Lietuvos Matem. Rink. 21, 121–133.Google Scholar
Prakasa Rao, B. L. S. (1988) Statistical inference from sampled data for stochastic processes. Contemp. Math. 80, 249–284.Google Scholar
Rümelin, W. (1982) Numerical treatment of stochastic differential equations. SIAM J. Num. Anal. 19, 604–613.Google Scholar
Sørensen, M. (1990) On quasi likelihood for semimartingales. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 34, 331–346.Google Scholar
Sørensen, M. (1991) Likelihood methods for diffusions with jumps. In Statistical Inference in Stochastic Processes. ed. Prabhu, N. U. and Basawa, I. V. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 67–105.Google Scholar
Talay, D. (1983) Résolution trajectorielle et analyse numérique des équations différentielles stochastiques. Stochastics 9, 275–306.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. and Platen, E. (1978) Approximation of Ito integral equations. Preprint. ZIMM, Akad. der Wiss. der DDR, Berlin.Google Scholar
Yoshida, N. (1992) Estimation for diffusion processes from discrete observation. J. Multivar. Anal. 41, 220–242.Google Scholar