Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:48:57.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law of Large Numbers for Dynamic Bargaining Markets

Part of: Markov processes Limit theorems Special processes Mathematical economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

René Ferland  and
Gaston Giroux
René Ferland*
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Montréal
Gaston Giroux*
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Montréal
*
∗Postal address: Department of Mathematics, University of Quebec in Montreal, PO Box 8888, Downtown Station, Montreal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada. Email address: [email protected]
∗∗Postal address: 410 Vimy, suite 1, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 3M9, Canada. Email address: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We describe the random meeting motion of a finite number of investors in markets with friction as a Markov pure-jump process with interactions. Using a sequence of these, we prove a functional law of large numbers relating the large motions with the finite market of the so-called continuum of agents.

Keywords

Functional law of large numbersdynamic bargaining marketmarket makers

MSC classification

Secondary: 60K35: Interacting random processes; statistical mechanics type models; percolation theory 60F99: None of the above, but in this section 60J75: Jump processes 91B26: Market models (auctions, bargaining, bidding, selling, etc.)
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 45 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2008 

References

Bezandry, P.-H., Ferland, R., Giroux, G. and Roberge, J.-C. (1994). Une approche probabiliste de résolution d'équations non linéaires. In Measure-Valued Processes, Stochastic Partial Differential Equations, and Interacting Systems, ed. Dawson, D. A., American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, pp. 17–33.Google Scholar
Billingsley, P. (1968). Convergence of Probability Measures. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Clark, J. M. C. and Katsouros, V. (1999). {Stably coalescent stochastic froths.} Adv. Appl. Prob. 31, 199–219.Google Scholar
Dawson, D. (1985). {Critical dynamics and fluctuations for a mean-field model of cooperative behavior.} J. Statist. Phys. 31, 29–85.Google Scholar
Duffie, D., Gârleanu, N. and Pedersen, L. H. (2005). {Over-the-counter markets}. Econometrica 73, 1815–1847.Google Scholar
Feng, S. (1997). The propagation of chaos of multitype mean field interacting particle systems. J. Appl. Prob. 34, 346–362.Google Scholar
Ferland, R. (1994). {Laws of large numbers for pairwise interacting particle systems}. Math. Models Meth. Appl. Sci. 4, 1–15.Google Scholar
Last, G. and Brandt, A. (1995). Marked Point Processes on the Real Line: The Dynamic Approach. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
McDonald, D. R. and Reynier, J. (2006). {Mean field convergence of a model of multiple TCP connections through a buffer implementing RED.} Ann. Appl. Prob. 16, 244–294.Google Scholar
Perthame, B. and Pulvirenti, M. (1995). {On some large systems of random particles which approximate scalar conservation laws.} Asympt. Anal. 10, 263–278.Google Scholar