Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:53:59.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Convergence of tandem Brownian queues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Sergio I. López*
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
*
* Postal address: Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad No 3000, C.U., Distrito Federal, 04510, Mexico. Email address: [email protected]

Abstract

It is known that in a stationary Brownian queue with both arrival and service processes equal in law to Brownian motion, the departure process is a Brownian motion, identical in law to the arrival process: this is the analogue of Burke's theorem in this context. In this paper we prove convergence in law to this Brownian motion in a tandem network of Brownian queues: if we have an arbitrary continuous process, satisfying some mild conditions, as an initial arrival process and pass it through an infinite tandem network of queues, the resulting process weakly converges to a Brownian motion. We assume independent and exponential initial workloads for all queues.

Type
Short Communications
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Anantharam, V. (1993).Uniqueness of stationary ergodic fixed point for a ∙/M/K node.Ann. Appl. Prob. 3, 154172. (Correction: 4 (1994), 607.) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Brémaud, P. (1981).Point Processes and Queues: Martingale Dynamics.Springer, New York.Google Scholar
[3]Burke, P. J. (1956).The output of a queuing system.Operat. Res. 4, 699704.Google Scholar
[4]Draief, M., Mairesse, J. and O'Connell, N. (2003).Joint Burke's theorem and RSK representation for a queue and a store. In Discrete Random Walks, Association of Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, Nancy, pp.6982.Google Scholar
[5]Ferrari, P. A. and Fontes, L. R. G. (1994).The net output process of a system with infinitely many queues.Ann. Appl. Prob. 4, 11291144.Google Scholar
[6]Harrison, J. M. (1985).Brownian Motion and Stochastic Flow Systems.John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
[7]Harrison, J. M. and Williams, R. J. (1990).On the quasireversibility of a multiclass Brownian service station.Ann. Prob. 18, 12491268.Google Scholar
[8]Kallenberg, O. (2002).Foundations of Modern Probability, 2nd edn.Springer, New York.Google Scholar
[9]Konstantopoulos, T. and Anantharam, V. (1995).Optimal flow control schemes that regulate the burstiness of traffic.IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 3, 423432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Lieshout, P. and Mandjes, M. (2007).Tandem Brownian queues.Math. Meth. Operat. Res. 66, 275298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Lieshout, P. and Mandjes, M. (2008).Asymptotic analysis of Lévy-driven tandem queues.Queueing Systems 60, 203226.Google Scholar
[12]Martin, J. B. and Prabhakar, B. (2010).Fixed points for multi-class queues. Preprint. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.3024v1.Google Scholar
[13]Mountford, T. and Prabhakar, B. (1995).On the weak convergence of departures from an infinite series of ∙/M/1 queues.Ann. Appl. Prob. 5, 121127.Google Scholar
[14]O'Connell, N. and Yor, M. (2001).Brownian analogues of Burke's theorem.Stoch. Process. Appl. 96, 285304.Google Scholar
[15]Salminen, P. and Norros, I. (2001).On busy periods of the unbounded Brownian storage.Queueing Systems 39, 317333.Google Scholar
[16]Whitt, W. (2002).Stochastic-Process Limits.Springer, New York.Google Scholar