No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Continuous-Time Ehrenfest Process in Term Structure Modelling
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 July 2016
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
In this paper, a finite-state mean-reverting model for the short rate, based on the continuous-time Ehrenfest process, will be examined. Two explicit pricing formulae for zero-coupon bonds will be derived in the general and special symmetric cases. Its limiting relationship to the Vasicek model will be examined with some numerical results.
Keywords
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2010
References
[1]
Billingsley, P. (1968). Convergence of Probability Measures. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
[2]
Bingham, N. H. (1991). Fluctuation theory for the Ehrenfest urn. Adv. Appl. Prob.
23, 598–611.Google Scholar
[3]
Brémaud, P. (1999). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]
Brigo, D. and Mercurio, F. (2005). Interest Rate Models - Theory and Practice. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
[5]
Bühlmann, H. (1994). Continuous and discrete models in finance, in particular for stochastic interest rates. Decisions Econom. Finance
17, 3–20.Google Scholar
[6]
Delbaen, F. and Shirakawa, H. (2002). An interest rate model with upper and lower bounds. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets
9, 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]
Gross, K. I. and Richards, D. St. P. (1989). Total positivity, spherical series, and hypergeometric functions of matrix argument. J. Approx. Theory
59, 224–246.Google Scholar
[8]
Karlin, S. and McGregor, J. (1965). Ehrenfest urn models. J. Appl. Prob.
2, 352–376.Google Scholar
[9]
Karlin, S. and Taylor, H. M. (1981). A Second Course in Stochastic Processes. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
[10]
Koev, P. and Edelman, A. (2006). The efficient evaluation of the hypergeometric function of a matrix argument. Math. Comput.
75, 833–846.Google Scholar
[11]
Krafft, O. and Schaefer, M. (1993). Mean passage times for tridiagonal transition matrices and a two-parameter Ehrenfest urn model. J. Appl. Prob.
30, 964–970.Google Scholar
[12]
Lakner, P. (2006). Martingale measures for a class of right-continuous processes. Math. Finance
3, 43–53.Google Scholar
[13]
Okunev, J. and Tippett, M. (1989). Continuous-time stochastic calculus: a survey of applications in finance and accountancy. IMA J. Manag. Math.
2, 157–171.Google Scholar
[14]
Rogers, L. C. G. (1995). Which model for term-structure of interest rates should one use? In Mathematical Finance (IMA Vol. Math. Appl. 65), eds Davis, M. H. A.
et al., Springer, New York, pp. 93–116.Google Scholar
[15]
Siegert, A. J. F. (1949). On the approach to statistical equilibrium. Phys. Rev.
76, 1708–1714.Google Scholar
[16]
Sumita, U., Gotoh, J. and Jin, H. (2006). Numerical exploration of dynamic behavior of Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes via Ehrenfest process approximation. J. Operat. Res. Soc. Japan
49, 256–278.Google Scholar
[17]
Szegö, G. (1983). Orthogonal Polynomials (Amer. Math. Soc. Coll. Publ. 23). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar
[18]
Takahashi, H. (2004). Ehrenfest model with large Jumps in finance. Physica D
189, 61–69.Google Scholar
[19]
Vasicek, O. (1977). An equilibrium characterisation of the term structure. J. Financial Econom. 5, 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]
Voit, M. (1996). Asymptotic distributions for the Ehrenfest urn and related random walks. J. Appl. Prob.
33, 340–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access