Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:28:13.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison Results for Branching Processes in Random Environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Franco Pellerey*
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Torino
*
Postal address: Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di Torino, corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy. Email address: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this note we consider branching processes whose behavior depends on a dynamic random environment, in the sense that we assume that the offspring distributions of individuals are parametrized, over time, by the realizations of a process describing the environmental evolution. We study how the variability in time of the environment modifies the variability of total population by considering two branching processes of this kind (but subjected to different environments). We also provide conditions on the random environments in order to stochastically compare their marginal distributions in the increasing convex sense. Weaker conditions are also provided for comparisons at every fixed time of the expected values of the two populations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2007 

References

Athreya, K. B. and Karlin, S. (1970). On branching processes with random environments. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 76, 865870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäuerle, N. and Rieder, U. (1997). Comparison results for Markov-modulated recursive models. Prob. Eng. Inf. Sci. 11, 203217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belzunce, F., Ortega, E., Pellerey, F. and Ruiz, J. M. (2006). Variability of total claim amounts under dependence between claims severity and number of claims. Insurance Math. Econom. 38, 460468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, T. E. (1989). The Theory of Branching Processes. Dover, New York.Google Scholar
Hu, T. and Pan, X. (2000). Comparisons of dependence for stationary Markov processes. Prob. Eng. Inf. Sci. 14, 299315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagers, P. and Lu, Z. (2002). Branching processes with deteriorating random environments. J. Appl. Prob. 39, 395401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joe, H. (1997). Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
Kimmel, M. and Axelrod, D. E. (2002). Branching Processes in Biology. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulik, R. (2003). Stochastic comparisons of multivariate random sums. Appl. Math. 30, 379387.Google Scholar
Müller, A. and Scarsini, M. (2000). Some remarks on the supermodular order. J. Multivariate Anal. 73, 107119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolski, T., Schmidli, H., Schmidt, V. and Teugels, J. (1999). Stochastic Processes for Insurance and Finance. John Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S. M. (1983). Stochastic Processes. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J. G. (1994). Stochastic Orders and Their Applications. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J. G. (1997). Supermodular stochastic orders and positive dependence of random vectors. J. Multivariate Anal. 61, 86101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. L. and Wilkinson, W. E. (1969). On branching processes in random environments. Ann. Math. Statist. 40, 814827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tchen, A. H. (1980). Inequalities for distributions with given marginals. Ann. Prob. 8, 814827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teich, M. C. and Saleh, B. E. A. (2000). Branching processes in quantum electronics. IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electron. 6, 14501457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar