Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:11:00.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pair correlation functions and limiting distributions of iterated cluster point processes

Part of: Inference from stochastic processes Markov processes Stochastic processes Geometric probability and stochastic geometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2018

Jesper Møller  and
Andreas D. Christoffersen
Jesper Møller*
Affiliation:
Aalborg University
Andreas D. Christoffersen*
Affiliation:
Aalborg University
*
* Postal address: Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University, Skjernvej 4A, 9220 Aalborg Øst, Denmark.
* Postal address: Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University, Skjernvej 4A, 9220 Aalborg Øst, Denmark.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider a Markov chain of point processes such that each state is a superposition of an independent cluster process with the previous state as its centre process together with some independent noise process and a thinned version of the previous state. The model extends earlier work by Felsenstein (1975) and Shimatani (2010) describing a reproducing population. We discuss when closed-form expressions of the first- and second-order moments are available for a given state. In a special case it is known that the pair correlation function for these type of point processes converges as the Markov chain progresses, but it has not been shown whether the Markov chain has an equilibrium distribution with this, particular, pair correlation function and how it may be constructed. Assuming the same reproducing system, we construct an equilibrium distribution by a coupling argument.

Keywords

Couplingequilibriumindependent clusteringMarkov chainpair correlation functionreproducing populationweighted determinantal and permanental point processes

MSC classification

Primary: 60G55: Point processes 60J20: Applications of Markov chains and discrete-time Markov processes on general state spaces (social mobility, learning theory, industrial processes, etc.)
Secondary: 60D05: Geometric probability and stochastic geometry 62M30: Spatial processes
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 789 - 809
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Andersen, I. T. et al. (2018). Double Cox cluster processes - with applications to photoactivated localization microscopy. Spatial Statist. 27, 58–73.Google Scholar
[2]Barndorff-Nielsen, O., Kent, J. and Sørensen, M. (1982). Normal variance-mean mixtures and z distributions. Internat. Statist. Rev. 50, 145–159.Google Scholar
[3]Daley, D. J. and Vere-Jones, D. (2003). An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Vol. I, Elementary Theory and Methods, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
[4]Felsenstein, J. (1975). A pain in the torus: some difficulties with models of isolation by distance. Amer. Naturalist 109, 359–368.Google Scholar
[5]Kingman, J. F. C. (1977). Remarks on the spatial distribution of a reproducing population. J. Appl. Prob. 14, 577–583.Google Scholar
[6]Lavancier, F., Møller, J. and Rubak, E. (2015). Determinantal point process models and statistical inference. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 77, 853–877.Google Scholar
[7]Macchi, O. (1975). The coincidence approach to stochastic point processes. Adv. Appl. Prob. 7, 83–122.Google Scholar
[8]Matérn, B. (1960). Spatial Variation. Meddelanden från Statens Skogforskningsinstitut, Stockholm.Google Scholar
[9]Matérn, B. (1986). Spatial Variation (Lecture Notes Statist. 36), 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
[10]McCullagh, P. and Møller, J. (2006). The permanental process. Adv. Appl. Prob. 38, 873–888.Google Scholar
[11]Møller, J. (1989). Random tessellations in Rd. Adv. Appl. Prob. 21, 37–73.Google Scholar
[12]Møller, J. (1994). Lectures on Random Voronoi Tessellations (Lecture Notes Statist. 87). Springer, New York.Google Scholar
[13]Møller, J. (2003). Shot noise Cox processes. Adv. Appl. Prob. 35, 614–640.Google Scholar
[14]Møller, J. and Christoffersen, A. D. (2018). Pair correlation functions and limiting distributions of iterated cluster point processes. Preprint. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.08984.Google Scholar
[15]Møller, J. and Torrisi, G. L. (2005). Generalised shot noise Cox processes. Adv. Appl. Prob. 37, 48–74.Google Scholar
[16]Møller, J. and Torrisi, G. L. (2007). The pair correlation function of spatial Hawkes processes. Statist. Prob. Lett. 77, 995–1003.Google Scholar
[17]Møller, J. and Waagepetersen, R. P. (2004). Statistical Inference and Simulation for Spatial Point Processes. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
[18]Myllymäki, M. et al. (2017). Global envelope tests for spatial processes. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 79, 381–404.Google Scholar
[19]Neyman, J. and Scott, E. L. (1958). Statistical approach to problems of cosmology. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 20, 1–43.Google Scholar
[20]Shimatani, I. K. (2010). Spatially explicit neutral models for population genetics and community ecology: extensions of the Neyman-Scott clustering process. Theoret. Pop. Biol. 77, 32–41.Google Scholar
[21]Shirai, T. and Takahashi, Y. (2003). Random point fields associated with certain Fredholm determinants. I. Fermion, Poisson and boson point processes. J. Functional Anal. 205, 414–463.Google Scholar
[22]Thomas, M. (1949). A generalization of Poisson's binomial limit for use in ecology. Biometrika 36, 18–25.Google Scholar
[23]Van Lieshout, M. N. M. and Baddeley, A. J. (2002). Extrapolating and interpolating spatial patterns. In Spatial Cluster Modelling, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 61–86.Google Scholar
[24]Wiegand, T., Gunatilleke, S., Gunatilleke, N. and Okuda, T. (2007). Analyzing the spatial structure of a Sri Lankan tree species with multiple scales of clustering. Ecology 88, 3088–3102.Google Scholar