Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:10:58.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Branching processes in near-critical random environments

Part of: Markov processes Special processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Peter Jagers  and
Fima Klebaner
Peter Jagers
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Statistics, Chalmers University of Technology, Chalmers, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden. Email address: [email protected]
Fima Klebaner
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia. Email address: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Branching processes are studied in random environments that are influenced by the population size and approach criticality as the population gets large. Results are applied to the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which is empirically known to exhibit first exponential and then linear growth of molecule numbers.

Keywords

Branching processrandom environmentPCR

MSC classification

Primary: 60J80: Branching processes (Galton-Watson, birth-and-death, etc.)
Secondary: 60K37: Processes in random environments
Type
Part 1. Branching processes
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 41 , Issue A: Stochastic Methods and their Applications , 2004 , pp. 17 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Athreya, K. B. and Karlin, S. (1971). On branching processes with random environments. I. Extinction probabilities. Ann. Math. Statist. 42, 1499–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breiman, L. (1968). Probability. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
Hall, P. and Heyde, C. C. (1980). Martingale Limit Theory and Its Application. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Höpfner, R. (1985). On some classes of population-size-dependent Galton-Watson processes. J. Appl. Prob. 22, 25–36.Google Scholar
Jagers, P. (1992). Stabilities and instabilities in population dynamics. J. Appl. Prob. 29, 770–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagers, P. and Klebaner, F. (2003). Random variation and concentration effects in PCR. J. Theoret. Biol. 224, 299–304.Google Scholar
Jagers, P. and Lu, Z. (2002). Branching processes with deteriorating random environments. J. Appl. Prob. 39, 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kersting, G. (1986). On recurrence and transience of growth models. J. Appl. Prob. 23, 614–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kersting, G. (1991). Asymptotic Gamma distribution for stochastic difference equations. Stoch. Process. Appl. 40, 15–28.Google Scholar
Klebaner, F. C. (1984). On population-size-dependent branching processes. Adv. Appl. Prob. 16, 30–55.Google Scholar
Klebaner, F. C. (1989). Stochastic difference equations and generalized Gamma distributions. Ann. Prob. 17, 178–188.Google Scholar
Pakes, A. G. and Heyde, C. C. (1982). Optimal estimation of the criticality parameter of a supercritical branching process having random environments. J. Appl. Prob. 19, 415–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnell, S. and Mendoza, C. (1997a). Enzymological considerations for a theoretical description of the quantitative competitive polymerase chain reaction (QC-PCR). J. Theoret. Biol. 184, 433–440.Google Scholar
Schnell, S. and Mendoza, C. (1997b). Theoretical description of the quantitative competitive polymerase chain reaction (QC-PCR). J. Theoret. Biol. 188, 313–318.Google Scholar
Smith, W. L. and Wilkinson, W. E. (1969). On branching processes in random environments. Ann. Math. Statist. 40, 814–827.Google Scholar
Wang, H.-X. (1999). Extinction of population-size-dependent branching processes in random environments. J. Appl. Prob. 36, 146–154.Google Scholar
Wang, H.-X. and Fang, D. (1999). Asymptotic behaviour of population-size-dependent branching processes in Markovian random environments. J. Appl. Prob. 36, 611–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar