Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:16:30.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of selenium source on the performance, feathering and meat quality of broilers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2017

V. Ravindran  and
S. Elliott
V. Ravindran
Affiliation:
Massey University, Palmerston North, NEW ZEALAND
S. Elliott*
Affiliation:
Alltech Inc, Catnip Pike, Nicholasville, KY, USA
*
*Corresponding author:[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The following trial was conducted to investigate the effects of Se source (inorganic sodium selenite (SS) versus organic use Sel-Plex® (SP; Alltech Inc, Nicholasville, KY, USA)) on the performance, feathering and meat quality of 900, one-day-old male broilers over a 42 day growing period. Pens (n = 20) were randomly assigned to either: Diet A (no Se; negative control), Diet B as for diet A plus 0.3 mg/kg SS (positive control), Diet C as for diet A plus 0.2 mg/kg SP, Diet D as for diet A plus 0.3 mg/kg SP and Diet E as for diet A plus 0.4 mg/kg SP. From day 1 to 28, significant (P < 0.05) treatment effects were seen for feed intake and FCR, with values for the negative control being higher than for the diets containing Se. The best FCR was recorded for the diet containing 0.4 mg/kg SP. Breast meat yield for birds fed the negative control were lower than those fed selenite or SP supplemented diets (P < 0.05). Feather measurements on d 14, 28 and 42 of age showed that, although scores became poorer with age (4.9 at 14 d, 4.6 at 28 d and 3.6 at 42 d), they were unaffected (P > 0.05) by dietary Se inclusion. Numeric trends in favour of SP were seen in cooking losses in meat chilled for 24 hours and seven days. Cooking losses in meat frozen for seven days were significantly influenced by Se inclusion, whereby values for birds fed 0.3 and 0.4 mg/kg SP were significantly lower than values for birds fed inorganic selenite (P < 0.05). Tissue Se concentrations were highest for the SP diets. Meat oxidation from the birds fed SP was lower than for the birds fed no Se or SS. The results demonstrated that SP may be more advantageous in improving certain variables of performance and meat quality compared to inorganic sources of Se.

Keywords

Seleniumbroilersfeatheringperformanceoxidationuse Sel-Plex®selenite
Type
Original Research
Information
Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition , Volume 5 , 2017 , e6
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition Ltd. 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, W.M. (1950) A simple method of analysing complicated absorption curves, of use in the colorimetic determination of urinary steroids. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 10: 71.Google Scholar
Boiago, M. M., Borba, H., Leonel, F. R., Giampietro-Ganeco, A., Ferrari, F. B., Stefani, L. M. and Souza, P.A.D. (2014) Sources and levels of selenium on breast meat quality of broilers. Ciência Rural 44 (9): 1692–1698.Google Scholar
Brunori, C., De la Calle, M.B., Angelone, M. and Morabito, R. (1999) Determination of total selenium in mussel and wheat samples after tetramethylammonium hydroxide digestion. Annali Di Chimica 89: 873–880.Google Scholar
Choct, M. and Naylor, A.J. (2004) The effect of dietary selenium source and vitamin E levels on performance of male broilers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 17: 1000–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choct, M., Naylor, A.J. and Reinke, N. (2004) Selenium supplementation affects broiler growth performance, meat yield and feather coverage. British Poultry Science 45: 677–683.Google Scholar
Del Puerto, M. D., Cabrera, M. C., Terevinto, A., Olivero, R. and Saadoun, A. (2014) Selenium in poultry diets: effect on pH, color, glycogen and lactate kinetic in fresh and aged Pectoralis and Gastrocnemius muscles. In Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal 22. (5):174–176. Asociación Latinoamericana de Producción Animal.Google Scholar
Deniz, G.S., Genzen, S. and Turkmen, I.I. (2005) Effects of two supplemental dietary selenium sources (mineral and organic) on broiler performance and drip loss. Revue de Medicine Veterinaire 156: 423–426.Google Scholar
Dhumal, M. V., Nikam, M. G., Khose, K. K. and Ingle, V. D. (2013) Comparative effect of selenium source on the performance, meat quality and meat oxidative stability of broiler chickens. Scientific Journal of Veterinary Advances 2(10): 150–156.Google Scholar
Dou, T.C., Shi, S.R., Sun, H.J. and Wang, K.H. (2009) Growth rate, carcass traits and meat quality of slow growing chicken grown according to three raising systems. Animal Science Papers and Reports 27: 361–369.Google Scholar
Downs, K.M., Hess, J.B. and Bilgili, S.F. (2000) Selenium source effect on broiler carcass characteristics, meat quality and drip loss. Journal of Applied Animal Research 18: 61–72.Google Scholar
Edens, F.W. (1996) Organic selenium: From feathers to muscle integrity to drip loss: Five years onward: No more selenite!. Biotechnology in the Feed Industry. Proceedings of Alltech's 12th Annual Symp. (Eds. Lyons, T.P. and Jacques, K.A.). Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK. pp. 165–185.Google Scholar
Edens, F.W., Parkhurst, C.R., Havenstein, G.B. and Sefton, A.E. (2001) Housing and selenium influences on feathering in broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 10: 128–134.Google Scholar
Glatz, P. C. (2001) Effect of poor feather cover on feed intake and production of aged layers in winter. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science 14: 553–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, T., Ando, K. and Kikugawa, K. (1998) Specific determination of malonaldehyde by N-methyl-2-phenylindole or thiobarbituric acid. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 75: 97–600.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar-McCluskey, V., Fisher, C, and Van Tuijl, O. (2014) A practical guide to managing feather cover in broiler breeder females. Ross Technical Notes.Google Scholar
Mahan, D.C. and Parrett, N.A. (1996) Evaluating the efficacy of selenium-enriched yeast and sodium selenite on tissue selenium retention and serum glutathione peroxidise activity in grower and finisher swine. Journal of Animal Science 74: 2967–2974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahan, D.C., Cline, T.R. and Richert, B. (1999) Effects of dietary levels of selenium enriched yeast and sodium selenite as selenium sources fed to growing-finishing pigs on performance, tissue selenium, serum glutathione peroxidase activity, carcass characteristics and loin quality. Journal of Animal Science 77: 2172–2179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahmoud, K.Z. and Edens, F.W. (2003) Influence of selenium sources on age related and mild heat stress-related changes of blood and liver glutathione redox cycle in broiler chickens (Gallus domesticus). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology-Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 136: 921–934.Google Scholar
Mansoub, N.H., Chekani-Azar, S., Mizban, S., Hamadani, M., Ahadi, F. and Lotfi, A. (2010) Influence of replacing inorganic by organic selenium source in ration on performance and carcass characteristics of male broilers. Global Veterinaria 4(4): 317–321.Google Scholar
Miller, D., Soares, H.J., Bauersfeld, P. and Cuppett, S.L. (1972) Comparative selenium retention by chicks fed sodium selenite, selenomethionine, fish meal, and fish soluble. Poultry Science 51: 1669–1673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, A., Ravindran, V., Ravindran, G., Thomas, D. V., Kocher, A., and Sacranie, A. (2009) selenium form and function: impact of Sel-Plex® on broiler efficiency and meat quality. In Proceedings of the 20th Australian Poultry Science Symposium, 2009, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 9–11th February 2009. (pp. 70–72). Poultry Research Foundation.Google Scholar
Oliveira, T.F.B., Rivera, D.F.R., Mesquita, F.R., Braga, H., Ramos, E.M. and Bertechini, A.G. (2014) Effect of different sources and levels of selenium on performance, meat quality and tissue characteristics of broilers. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 23(1): 15–22.Google Scholar
Payne, R.L. and Southern, L.L. (2005) Comparison of inorganic and organic selenium sources for broilers. Poultry Science 84: 898–902.Google Scholar
Peric, L., Milosevic, N., Zikic, D. and Nollet, L. (2006) Effect of Sel-Plex and Bioplex substitution of inorganic trace mineral sources on performance, feathering, and hock condition of broilers. In EPC 2006–12th European Poultry Conference, Verona, Italy, 10–14 September, 2006. World's Poultry Science Association (WPSA).Google Scholar
Perić, L., Milošević, N., Žikić, D., Kanački, Z., Džinić, N., Nollet, L. and Spring, P. (2009) Effect of selenium sources on performance and meat characteristics of broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18: 403–409.Google Scholar
Rajashree, K. and Muthukumar, T. (2013) Preparation of selenium tolerant yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Research 3: 46–53.Google Scholar
Rajashree, K., Muthukumar, T. and Karthikeyan, N. (2014) Comparative study of the effects of organic selenium on hen performance and productivity of broiler breeders. British Poultry Science 55(3): 367–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute. (1997) SAS/STAT® User's Guide: Statistics. Version 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Spears, J.W., Grimes, J., Lloyd, K. and Ward, T.L. (2003) Efficacy of a novel organic selenium compound (zinc-lselenomethionine, Availa selenium) in broiler chicks. pp. 197–198 in Proceedings of the 1st Latin American Congress on Animal. Nutition, Cancum, Mexico.Google Scholar
Surai, P.F. (2002) Natural antioxidants in avian nutrition and reproduction. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Surai, P.F. and Fisinin, V.I. (2014) Selenium in poultry breeder nutrition: an update. Animal Feed Science and Technology 191: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upton, R.J., Edens, F.W. and Ferket, P.R. (2008) Selenium yeast effect on broiler performance. International Journal of Poultry Science 7: 798–805.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. X., Zhan, X. A., Yuan, D., Zhang, X. W. and Wu, R. J. (2011) Effects of selenomethionine and sodium selenite supplementation on meat quality, selenium distribution and antioxidant status in broilers. Czech Journal of Animal Science 56(7): 305–313.Google Scholar