Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:19:06.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of nutrient variability in corn and xylanase inclusion on broiler performance, nutrient utilisation, and volatile fatty acid profiles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2018

M.P. Williams ,
H. V. Masey O'Neill ,
T. York  and
J.T. Lee
M.P. Williams
Affiliation:
Poultry Science Department, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M System, College Station, TX
H. V. Masey O'Neill
Affiliation:
AB Vista, Marlborough, UK
T. York
Affiliation:
AB Vista, Marlborough, UK
J.T. Lee*
Affiliation:
Poultry Science Department, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M System, College Station, TX
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objective of the trial was to determine the impact of corn source and xylanase on broiler performance, digestibility, and volatile fatty acid (VFA) profiles. Six corn samples were obtained from different regions of the US. Twelve treatments were derived using corn source, with each corn diet being fed with or without xylanase. Three dietary phases were used throughout the trial, starter (d 1–18), grower (d 19–31), and finisher (d 32–41). On d 18 and 41, ileal and excreta contents were collected for the determination of ileal digestible energy (IDE), ileal energy and nitrogen digestibility coefficients (IEDC and INDC), apparent metabolisable energy (AME), and caecal VFA profiles. Day 18 body weight (BW) was affected by corn source and varied between 724 and 764g (P = 0.001). For d 31 BW, there was an interaction of corn source with xylanase (P = 0.001), with the effect of xylanase being inconsistent. The effect of xylanase on feed conversion ratio (FCR) during the grower phase depended on corn source (interactive term, P = 0.021). Xylanase reduced (P = 0.026) FCR during the finisher phase (1.943 vs. 1.992). Variation of corn source influenced digestibility on all evaluated parameters. A range of 152 and 213 kcal/kg for IDE was observed on d 18 and 41, respectively (P = 0.005 and 0.001). The range of AME was 176 kcal/kg on d 18 of age which increased to 194 kcal/kg on d 41. Nitrogen digestibility was influenced by corn source, with an observed range of 4.4 and 6.1% for d 18 and 41, respectively, amongst all corn sources (P = 0.001). Xylanase increased (P = 0.031) the concentration of butyrate in the caecum on d 18. On d 41, an interaction between corn source and xylanase was observed with isovalerate in the caecal contents (P = 0.038). These data demonstrate the impact of varying corn nutrient profiles on nutrient utilisation and growth performance.

Keywords

broilerxylanasecorn sourcenutrient utilization
Type
Original Research
Information
Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition , Volume 6 , 2018 , e1
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition Ltd. 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adeola, O. and Bedford, M. R. (2004). Exogenous dietary xylanase ameliorates viscosity-induced anti-nutritional effects in wheat-based diets for White Pekin ducks (Anas platyrinchos domesticus). British Journal of Nutrition. 92:87–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bach Knudsen, K. E. (1997). Carbohydrate and lignin contents of plant materials used in animal feeding. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 67:319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedford, M. R. (1995). Mechanisms of action and potential environmental benefits from the use of feed enzymes. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 53:145–155.Google Scholar
Bedford, M. R. and Schultz, H. (1998). Exogenous enzymes for pigs and poultry. Nutrition Research Reviews. 11:91–114.Google Scholar
Bedford, M. R. (2002). The role of carbohydrases in feedstuff digestion. Pages 319–336 in Poultry Feedstuffs; Supply, Composition and Nutritive Value. J. M. McNab and K. N. Noorman, ed. CABI publishing, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, I. (1996). Complex carbohydrates and resistant starch. Nutrition Research Reviews. 54:115–119.Google Scholar
Choct, M. (1997). Feed non-starch polysaccharides: chemical structures and nutritional significance. Feed Milling Int., 13–26.Google Scholar
Choct, M., Hughes, R. J., and Bedford, M. R. (1999). Effects of a xylanase on individual bird variation, starch digestion throughout the intestine, and the ileal and cecal volatile fatty acid production in chickens fed wheat. British Poultry Science. 40:419–422.Google Scholar
Collins, N. E., Moran, E. T., Stilborn, H. L. (1998). Maize hybrid and bird maturity affect apparent metabolizable energy values. Poultry Science. 11:42.Google Scholar
Collins, N. E. and Moran, J. R. (2001). Influence of yellow dent maize hybrids having different kernel characteristics yet similar nutrient composition on broiler production. Journal of Applied Animal Research. 10:228–235.Google Scholar
Cowieson, A.J. (2005). Factors that affect the nutritional value of maize for broilers. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 119: 293–305.Google Scholar
Cowieson, A. J., Singh, D. N., and Adeola, O. (2006). Prediction of ingredient quality and the effect of a combination of xylanase, amylase, protease, and phytase in the diets of broiler chicks. II. Energy and nutrient utilization. British Poultry Science. 47:490–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowieson, A. J. (2010). Strategic selection of exogenous enzymes for corn/soy-based diets. Journal of Poultry Science. 47:1–7.Google Scholar
Cowieson, A.J. and Masey O'Neill, H.V. (2013). Effects of exogenous xylanase on performance, nutrient digestibility and caecal thermal profiles of broilers given wheat-based diets British Poultry Science. 54:3, 346–354.Google Scholar
Cromwell, G. L., Calvert, C. C., Cline, T. R., Crenshaw, J. D., Crenshaw, T. D., Easter, R. A., Ewan, R. C., Hamilton, C. R., Hill, G. M., Lewis, A. J., Mahan, D. C., Miller, E. R., Nelssen, J. L., Pettigrew, J. E., Tribble, L. F., Veum, T. L., and Yen, J. T. (1999). Variability among sources and laboratories in nutrient analyses of maize and soybean meal. Journal of Animal Science. 77:3262–3273.Google Scholar
Esmaeilipour, O, Shivazad, M., Moravej, H., Aminzadeh, S., Rezaian, M., and van Krimpen, M.M. (2011). Effects of xylanase and citric acid on the performance, nutrient retention, and  characteristics of gastrointestinal tract of broilers fed low-phosphorus wheat-based diets. Poultry Science. 90:1975–1982.Google Scholar
Gao, F., Jiang, Y., Zhou, G. H. and Han, Z. K. (2007). The effects of xylanase supplementation on growth, digestion, circulating hormone and metabolite levels, immunity and gut microflora in cockerels fed on wheat-based diets. British Poultry Science. 48:480–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gehring, C.K., Bedford, M. R., Cowieson, A. J., and Dozier, W. A. (2012). Effects of corn source  on the relationship between in vitro assays and ileal nutrient digestibility. Poultry Science 91:1908–1914.Google Scholar
Herrera-Saldana, R. E., Huber, J. T., Poore, M. H. (1990). Dry matter, crude protein, and starch digestibility of five cereal grains. Journal of Dairy Science. 73:2386–2393.Google Scholar
Kalmendal, R. and Tauson, R. (2012). Effects of a xylanase and protease, individually or in combination, and an ionophore coccidiostat on performance, nutrient utilization, and intestinal morphology in broiler chickens fed a wheat-soybean-meal based diet. Poultry Science. 91:1387–1393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leeson, S., Yersin, A., and Volker, L. (1993). Nutritive value of the 1992 maize crop. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2:208–213.Google Scholar
Leeson, S. and Summers, J. D. (1976). Effect of adverse growing conditions on corn maturity and feeding value for poultry. Poultry Science. 55:588–593.Google Scholar
Leigh, K. (1994). The unpredictable nature of maize. Pigs:37–39.Google Scholar
Maier, D. E. (1995). Indiana corn quality survey – composition data. Grain quality task force #24. Purdue University Extension Service.Google Scholar
Masey O'Neill, H.V., Mathis, G., Lumpkins, B.S. and Bedford, M.R. (2012). The effect of reduced calorie diets, with and without fat, and the use of xylanase on performance characteristics of broilers between 0 and 42 days. Poultry Science. 91:1356–1360.Google Scholar
Masey O'Neill, H.V., Singh, M. and Cowieson, A.J. (2014). Effect of exogenous xylanase on performance, nutrient digestibility, volatile fatty acid production and digestive tract thermal profiles of broilers fed wheat or maize-based diets. British Poultry Science. 55: 351–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noy, N. and Sklan, D.. (1995). Digestion and absorption in the young chick. Poultry Science 74:366–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council. (1994). Nutrient requirements of poultry: Ninth revised edition. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Piotrowski, C., Garcia, R., Flanagan, S., dos Santos, T., Philips, P., Ten Doeschate, R. and Cambt, P. (2011). Development of near infra-red reflectance spectroscopy calibration for the prediction of nutrients to assess the quality of the maize. In: proceedings of 9ieme Journees de la Recerche Avicole 2011, Tours, France, p. 114.Google Scholar
Rosen, G. (2002). Exogenous enzymes as pro-nutrients in broiler diets, in: Garnsworthy, P.C. & Wiseman, J. (Eds) Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, pp. 89–103. (Nottingham, Nottingham University Press).Google Scholar
Scott, M.L., Nesheim, M. C. and Young, R. J. Nutrition of the Chicken. 3rd Edition. Ithaca, NY, (1982). Print.Google Scholar
Short, F. J., Gorton, P., Wiseman, J. and Boorman, K. N. (1996). Determination of titanium dioxide as an inert marker in chicken digestibility studies. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 59:215–221.Google Scholar
Singh, A., Masey O'Neill, H.V., Ghosh, T.K., Bedford, M.R. and Haldar, S. (2012). Effects of xylanase supplementation on performance, total volatile fatty acids and selected bacterial populations in caeca, metabolic indices and peptide YY concentrations in serum of broiler chickens fed energy restricted maize-soybean based diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 177: 194–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slominski, B. A., Guenter, W. and Campbell, L. D. (1993). New approach to water-soluble carbohydrate determination as a tool for evaluation of plant cell wall degrading enzymes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 41:2304–2304.Google Scholar
Slominski, B. A. (2001). A new generation of enzymes for animal feeds. In: Proceedings of the 21st Western Nutrition Conference, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.Google Scholar
Smits, C. H. M. and Annison, G. (1996). Non-starch polysaccharides in broiler nutrition – towards a physiologically valid approach to their determination. World's Poultry Science Journal. 52:203–221.Google Scholar
Socorro, M., Levy-benshimol, A. and Tovar, J. (1989). In vitro digestibility of cereal and legume (Phaseolus vulgaris) starches by bovine, porcine and human pancreatic α-amylases. Starch. 2: 69–71.Google Scholar
Theander, O., Westerlund, E., Aman, P. and Graham, H. (1989). Plant cell walls and monogastric diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 23:205–225.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. R., Qiao, S. Y., Lu, W. Q. and Li, D. F. (2005). Effects of enzyme supplementation on performance, nutrient digestibility, gastrointestinal morphology, and volatile fatty acid profiles in the hindgut of broilers fed wheat based diets. Poultry Science. 84:875–881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weurding, R. E., Veldman, A., Veen, W. A., van der Aar, P. J. and Verstegen, M. W. (2001). Starch digestion rate in the small intestine of the chicken differs among feedstuffs. Journal of Nutrition. 131:2329–2335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yagani, M. and Korver, D. R. (2013). Effects of corn source and exogenous enzymes on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 92:1208–1220.Google Scholar