No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
The purpose of this article is to address coexistent Anglican faith identities that have flourished in contexts after the colonial period. Thus far these identities have been treated as differences in viewpoints. Metaphysically speaking member differences are included as ‘parts’ of the one ‘whole’ Body of Christ. Without a postcolonial metaphysical and theological critique that decolonizes the Body of Christ, as the Church, then parts repeatedly seek, to redefine, restore or reform the ‘whole’ to maintain the whole’s coherence and empowering the former part. Ignoring the metaphysical aspect of ecclesial identity postpones the emergence of a postcolonial Anglican Communion where multiple faith identities can coexist.
Joseph F. Duggan is a doctoral researcher at the University of Manchester, England, and a priest in the Diocese of Nevada in The Episcopal Church.
2. Douglas, Ian T., ‘Anglicans Gathering for God’s Mission: A Missiological Ecclesiology for the Anglican Communion’, The Journal of Anglican Studies 2.2 (2004), p. 10.Google Scholar
3. Jn 15.5 and Jn 14.2.Google Scholar
4. Henry, Desmond P., Medieval Mereology (Amsterdam: B.R. Gruner, 1991), pp. 218–328; Thomas Gilby, Between Community and Society: A Philosophy and Theology of the State (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1953), pp. 107–23; and Guy Mansini, ‘On the Relation of Particular to Universal Church’, Irish Theological Quarterly 69 (2004), p. 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Tierney, Brian, Foundations of The Conciliar Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1955), pp. 132–513.Google Scholar
6. Lambeth Commission, The Windsor Report (New York: Morehouse Publishing, 2004), paragraphs 9, 10, 16, 17, 23, 33, 51, 61, 65, 67 and 69.Google Scholar
7. Avis, Paul, Theology of The Reformers (New York: Marshall, Morgan and Scott, 1981), p. 73 and The Identity of Anglicanism: Essentials of Anglican Ecclesiology (London: T&T Clark, 2008), p. 46.Google Scholar
8. The Windsor Report, paragraphs 16 and 17.Google Scholar
9. Russell, Letty, Church In The Round: Feminist Interpretation of the Church (Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1993), p. 25.Google Scholar
10. The Most Reverend Edmond Lee Browning, Installation Address of the Presiding Bishop at Washington National Cathedral, Washington, DC, January 11, 1986 (repr. in New York: Diocesan Press Service [now Episcopal News Service], packet DPS-86004).Google Scholar
11. Palmer, William, The Ideal of the Christian Church (London: James Toovey, 1847).Google Scholar
12. Porter, Andrew, Religion versus Empire: British Protestant Missionaries and Overseas Expansion, 1700–1914 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004), p. 13; Rowan Strong, Anglicanism and The British Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 60; and Paul Avis, The Identity of Anglicanism (London: T&T Clark, 2008), p. 53.Google Scholar
13. The Episcopal Church, Constitutions and Canons (New York: Church House Publishing, 2003), p. 120 and September 19, 2008 letter from the Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori on the Deposition of a Bishop, Bishop Robert W. Duncan, http://www.episcopalchurch.org/documents/Duncan.Robert.9.19.08.pdf. Accessed 22 March, 2009.Google Scholar
14. Henry, pp. 230–32.Google Scholar
15. Tanner, Kathryn, Theories of Culture: A New Agenda For Theology (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1997), p. 61.Google Scholar
16. Schneider, Laurel, Beyond Monotheism: A Theology of Multiplicity (London: Routledge, 2008), pp. 4, 9–10.Google Scholar
17. Keller, Catherine, Nausner, Michael and Rivera, Mayra, Postcolonial Theologies: Divinity and Empire (St. Louis: Chalice Press, 2004), p. 11.Google Scholar
18. Adams, Marilyn McCord, ‘Shaking the Foundations: LGBT Bishops and Blessings in the Fullness of Time’, Anglican Theological Review 90.4 (2008), pp. 713—732.Google Scholar
19. Adams, p. 721.Google Scholar
20. Sugirtharajah, R.S., Postcolonial Reconfigurations: An Alternative Way of Reading the Bible and Doing Theology (St. Louis: Chalice Press, 2003), p. 126.Google Scholar
21. Adams, pp. 731–32.Google Scholar
22. Adams, p. 714.Google Scholar