Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:40:36.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Innovation and Undecidability: Some Implications for the Koinonia of the Anglican Church

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Stephen Pickard
Stephen Pickard
Affiliation:
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Anglican Church is now a worldwide communion and international Anglicanism is marked by a high degree of variety and significant tensions both at local and international levels. Dealing with diversity and conflict across the communion may be the most pressing issue facing Anglicanism in the twenty-first century. Certainly the needs of mission require a strong focus on local and regional concerns and the history of Anglicanism bears testimony to a strong emphasis on a contextual and incarnational approach to discipleship, worship and social engagement. For this reason the Anglican Church has always wrestled with the tension between its inherited identity and the demand for relevance in an expanding communion. Many of the tensions and unresolved conflicts that beset modern Anglicanism arise because of the astonishing capacity of the Church to develop new responses in new situations that result in practices that do not fit easily with the received tradition. These point to a fundamental fact of Christianity; its inherent creativity and capacity for innovation. But not all innovations are wise for the Church; many innovations generate further conflict and the people of God are often confused or puzzled about what innovations to adopt or reject, and how to facilitate either of these scenarios. Some examples in the history of Christianity include controversies over the date of Easter, the development of church order (for example, episcopacy), doctrinal developments (for example, homoousion of the Nicene Creed), and issues to do with slavery, marriage, divorce and, more recently, ordination of women. None of these ‘innovations’ were greeted with immediate consensus at the point of local adoption nor as the innovation became more widely known and assimilated into the life of the Church.

From an ecclesial point of view the fact of innovation represents both a challenge to, and opportunity for an enhanced koinonia in the gospel. Minimally this involves commitment to ongoing patient dialogue and face-to-face encounter as innovations are wrestled with, differences explored and conflicts faced. This article considers further the concepts of innovation and undecidability as critical issues underlying much of our current difficulties. The article then inquires as to their relevance and importance for the koinonia of the Anglican Communion.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Anglican Studies , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , October 2004 , pp. 87 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © SAGE Publications (Los Angeles, London, New Delhi and Singapore) and The Journal of Anglican Studies Trust 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The dialectical relation between identity and relevance is discussed by Moltmann, Jurgen, The Crucified God (London: SCM Press, 1974), pp. 7–30.Google Scholar

2. Note that even here the process of guarding/preserving is not simple. It requires the assistance of the indwelling Holy Spirit, the teacher of truth. Guarding is an inherently dynamic interpretive activity that resists attempts at political and theological short cuts.

3. See Young, F., From Nicea to Chalœdon (London: SCM Press, 1983), pp. 63–64.Google Scholar

4. For a discussion of the influence of the doctrine of divine simplicity from its origins in Greek metaphysics see Pannenberg, W., Basic Questions in Theology (3 vols.; London: SCM Press, 1971), II, pp. 165–73Google Scholar. The Roman Catholic theologian, William Hill, suggests that the early centuries of trinitarian and christological reflection can be understood as an attempt to show how ‘neither the Incarnation of the Word nor the real distinction of divine persons is in any way injurious to God's simplicity’, ‘Simplicity of God’, in New Catholic Encyclopedia of Theology (ed. State Catholic University of America; 14 vols.; Washington: McGraw-Hill, 1967), XIII, p. 230.Google Scholar

5. See the discussion of homoousion by Torrance, T., The Trinitarian Faith (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1988), pp. 132–35.Google Scholar

6. For this translation of Tertullian, 's Prescriptions against the HereticsGoogle Scholar, see Jewel, John, Apologia Ecclesiae Anglicanae: An Apology of the Church of England and Defence of the Apology in Ayre, J. (ed.), The Works of John Jewel (4 vols.; The Parker Society; Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1848), III, p. 100.Google Scholar

7. Jewel, , Apologia Ecclesiae Anglicanae, III, p. 106.Google Scholar

8. See McAdoo, H., The Spirit of Anglicanism (London: A. & C. Black, 1965), p. 320Google Scholar. The force of the appeal to antiquity was weakened with the emergence of a more critical and refined historical critical method in the course of the seventeenth century. See Shapiro, B.J., Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth Century England: A Study in the Relationship between Natural Science, Religion, History, Law and Literature (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983), p. 109.Google Scholar

9. See The Via Media of the Anglican Church (2 vols.; London: Basil, Montague & Pickering, London, 1877), IGoogle Scholar, ‘On the Essentials of the Gospel’, pp. 254–55.Google Scholar

10. Adiaphora: things neither commanded nor forbidden.

11. This has been developed in the wake of Vatican 2 through the concept of the ‘hierarchy of truths’. See The Notion of ‘Hierarchy of Truths’: An Ecumenical Interpretation (Joint Working Group between the Roman Catholic Church and the World Council of Churches, Sixth Report; Geneva: WCC, 1990), Appendix B, pp. 38–46.Google Scholar

12. An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine (Pelican Books edn, 1974).Google Scholar

13. For further discussion, see Prickett, S., Romanticism and Religion: The Tradition of Coleridge and Wordsworth in the Victorian Church (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976), esp. pp. 162…63.Google Scholar

14. Preservation of the essential idea; continuity of principles; power of assimilation of true developments; definite anticipation at an early period in the history of the idea to which development belongs; gradual and orderly logical sequence; an addition which is conservative of what has gone before it; chronic continuance.

15. Paul Avis has commented that ‘Consensus fidelium has now established itself as one of the key concepts of contemporary ecclesiology’. See Avis, P., Ecumenical Theology and the Elusiveness of Doctrine (London: SPCK, 1986), p. 60.Google Scholar

16. The question of slavery is a relatively modern example and even more recently the issue of racism.

17. In Anglicanism, at least, the truth we can carry together is the truth that binds us. We have never had the luxury of splitting questions of truth from the social/ecclesiological context—which is always more than mere context but rather the essential condition for the emergence of truth.

18. For a useful overview and discussion of Derrida's scattered references to undecidability in relation to moral decisions see Llewelyn, John, ‘Responsibility with Indecidability’ in Wood, David (ed.), Derrida: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992), ch. 4Google Scholar. I am grateful to Dr Winifred Lamb, for references and discussion on this issue and a copy of an unpublished paper by Reynolds, Jack, Australian National University, ‘Habituality and Undecidability: A Comparison of Merleau-Ponty and Derrida on Decision’.Google Scholar

19. Derrida, J., The Gift of Death (trans. Wills, David; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995), pp. 65–66.Google Scholar

20. See the discussion by Critchley, Simon, The Ethics of Deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar

21. ‘Courtesy is the style of interaction with the “other”. It is characterised by thoughtfulness, respect, graceful speech and attentive listening.’ George Steiner refers to both the ‘yearning’ and ‘fear’ of the other necessarily involved in courtesy. For discussion see Garrett, Graeme, ‘Open Heaven/Closed Hearts: Theological Reflections on Ecumenical Relations’, Faith and Freedom, A Journal of Christian Ethics 6 (1998), p. 18.Google Scholar

22. Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity (1593) (London: Dent, Everyman edn, 1907), bk 1, ch. 1, para. 4.Google Scholar

23. See, for example, Col. 1.19, 2.9 (fullness); Jn 10.10b (abundance); 1 Tim. 1.14 (superabundance). In the same vein Ricoeur refers to Paul's letter to the Romans 5.15 21 as ‘the “odd” logic of superabundance’ wherein an ‘ordinary “logic” collapses and the “logic” of God…blows up’ (Crossan, J.D. et al. [eds.], Paul Ricoeur on Biblical Hermeneutics [Semeia, 4; Missoula, MT: SBL, 1975], p. 138).Google Scholar

24. This of course makes the problem of theodicy fundamental for Christianity. Perhaps the undecidable of all undecidables!

25. See The Destiny of Man (New York: Harper, Torchbook edn, 1960), ch. 3Google Scholar. Berdyaev develops a trinitarian approach to Christian ethics moving from the ethics of law to redemption to the ethics of creativeness, the last being the work of the eternal Spirit.

26. Berdyaev, , The Destiny of Man, p. 151.Google Scholar

27. While we seek plain and clear texts, doctrines and ethical standards, perhaps the reality is quite different. We have difficulty dealing with the ‘irremediable vagueness’ and indefiniteness that seems to lurk within the plainest of statements and positions. Yet this very ‘vagueness’ provides the conditions for diverse and new interpretations and responses. Charles Peirce's (1839–1914) notion of ‘irremediable vagueness’ is interesting in this regard. See Ochs, Peter, Peirce, Pragmatism and the Logic of Scripture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), ch. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28. If a system is internally consistent it will not be complete: If it aspires to completeness it will invariably contain inconsistencies. This, in essence, is Thomas Torrence's interpretation of Godel's theorum in Theological Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969), p. 255Google Scholar. Torrance points to the inevitability of open systems containing ‘undecidable or extrasystematic propositions’.

29. Article 20 of the Thirty-Nine Articles.

30. For a discussion of subsidiarity see The Virginia Report (Anglican Consultative Council, 1997), ch. 4 and para. 4.10 for present reference.Google Scholar

31. See Doe, Norman, Canon Law in the Anglican Communion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32. In this regard it is worth noting the nature of the questions posed for the Primate's meeting in October 2003 by the Inter-Anglican Theological and Doctrinal Commission. The first question asked the Primates to make a theological judgment concerning the significance of the blessing of same-sex unions, the ordination of nonabstinent homosexual persons to the diaconate and priesthood and the appointment of such a person to the office of Bishop. This theological question was followed up with two further questions of an ecclesial and pastoral kind. While consensus might not have been possible on the first question nonetheless the Commission was signalling the importance of responsible theological engagement as a primary task of church leaders precisely at a time when emotional, political and ideological tensions were most powerful. The full text of the Commission's paper is available on the web page of the Anglican Communion.

33. Hardy, Daniel's unpublished paper, ‘Anglicanism in the Twenty-First Century: Scriptural, Local, Global’, delivered at the American Academy of Religion, Atlanta, 2003Google Scholar, critiqued these two approaches to decision making in relation to the idea of Anglicanism.

34. Comments from an observer at the Convention.

35. See Steiner, G., Real Presences (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989), pp. 231–32.Google Scholar

36. Williams, R., Writing in the Dust: Reflections on the 11 September and its Aftermath (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 2002).Google Scholar

37. Williams, , Writing in the Dust, p. 81.Google Scholar

38. Hellerman, Joseph, The Ancient Church as Family (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2001), pp. 173–82.Google Scholar

39. Hellerman, , The Ancient Church as Family, p. 178.Google Scholar

40. The Holy Spirit as the active divine agent in the emergence of new koinonia was a key theme at the World Council of Churches in Canberra in 1991: ‘The Holy Spirit as the promoter of koinonia (2 Cor. 13:13) gives to those who are still divided the thirst and hunger for full communion. We remain restless until we grow together according to the wish and prayer of Christ that those who believe in him may be one (John 17:21). In the process of praying, working and struggling for unity, the Holy Spirit comforts us in pain, disturbs us when we are satisfied to remain in our division, leads us to repentance and grants us joy when our communion flourishes’, The Canberra Statement: ‘The Unity of the Church as Koinonia: Gift and Calling’ (para. 4.1) in Gassmann, Gunther and Radano, John (eds.), The Unity of the Church as Koinonia (Faith and Order Paper No. 163; Geneva: WCC, 1993).Google Scholar

41. Though this is not a reason for ignoring possibilities to establish ways and means for the communion (at all levels of its life) to seek those things most needful; time, space and peace.

42. For a discussion see Giddens, Anthony, The Consequences of Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990), especially ch. 3.Google Scholar