Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:09:03.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Power and Control over Women in Victorian England: Male Opposition to Sacramental Confession in the Anglican Church

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Rene Kollar
Rene Kollar
Affiliation:
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The patriarchal environment of nineteenth century England viewed women as weak and naïve creatures who should submit to the dictates of men. Religion, however, could give women a sense of freedom and independence from male authority. When auricular confession began to gain acceptance in some sections of the Anglican Church, women saw this as a way of asserting their independence because they could confide their personal thoughts and problems to a clergymen. This could, in the opinion of some, threaten the powerful role of the husband or father by substituting an alternative patriarchal system, and many critics warned of the dangers associated with the confessional, especially the weakening of the male dominated family structure. The Priest in Absolution gave advice to Anglican confessors, but the sexual nature of the questions, made public in 1877, shocked the public and confirmed the fears of the opponents of auricular confession.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Anglican Studies , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , June 2005 , pp. 11 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © SAGE Publications (Los Angeles, London, New Delhi and Singapore) and The Journal of Anglican Studies Trust 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Price, Richard, English Society 1680–1880 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 219.Google Scholar

2. Mumm, Susan, Stolen Daughters, Virgin Mothers: Anglican Sisterhoods in Victorian England (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1999), p. x.Google Scholar

3. Reed, John Shelton, Glorious Battle: The Cultural Politics of Victorian Anglo-Catholicism (Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1996), p. 200.Google Scholar

4. Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality. I. An Introduction (trans. Hurley, Robert; New York: Vintage Books, 1990), p. 61.Google Scholar

5. Foucault, , The History of Sexuality, pp. 61–62.Google Scholar

6. Foucault, , The History of Sexuality, p. 67.Google Scholar

7. Bentley, James, Ritualism and Politics in Victorian Britain: The Attempt to Legislate for Belief (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978), p. 34.Google Scholar

8. Bernstein, Susan David, Confessional Subjects: Revelations of Gender and Power in Victorian Literature and Culture (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1997), p. xi.Google Scholar

9. Bernstein, , Confessional Subjects, p. 43.Google Scholar

10. Bernstein, , Confessional Subjects, p. 47.Google Scholar

11. Yates, Nigel, ‘“Jesuits in Disguise”? Ritualist Confessors and their Critics in the 1870s’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 39 (04 1988), pp. 202–16 (209).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. Reed, , Glorious Battle, p. 12.Google Scholar

13. Gavin, Anthony, The Great Red Dragon: or the Master-Key to Popery (New York: Samuel Jones, 1854), p. 70Google Scholar. Gavin's book was published in Dublin in 1724, and during the next year an English edition appeared.

14. Gavin, , The Great Red Dragon, p. 72.Google Scholar

15. Gavin, , The Great Red Dragon, p. 76.Google Scholar

16. Blakeney, R. P., Manual of Romish Controversy: Being a Complete Refutation of the Creed of Pope Pius IV (Edinburgh: The Hope Trust, n.d.), p. 85Google Scholar. This book was first published in 1851. References taken from this later edition with no date of publication.

17. Blakeney, , Manual of Romish Controversy, p. 87.Google Scholar

18. Blakeney, R. P., Popery in its Social Aspect: Being a Complete Exposure of the Immorality and Intolerance of Romanism (Toronto: The Gospel Witness, n.d.), p. 170Google Scholar. This book was published in 1852 as a supplement to Manual of Romish Controversy. References are taken from this later edition with no date of publication.

19. Blakeney, , Popery in its Social Aspect, pp. 174–75.Google Scholar

20. Blakeney, , Popery in its Social Aspect, p. 176.Google Scholar

21. Walsh, Walter, The Secret History of the Oxford Movement (London: Chas. J. Thynne, 1898), p. 81.Google Scholar

22. Yates, , “Jesuits in Disguise”, p. 211.Google Scholar

23. Baring, F., Astounding Revelations of Puseyism in Belgravia, Containing the Most Frightful Disclosures of Diabolical Plots against Female Chastity by the Rev. Mr. Poole and Miss Joy, at the Fashionable Church of St. Barnabas, Pimlico (London: J. Hatswell, 1858)Google Scholar. Because of this meeting and pressure put on the Bishop of London, Archibald Campbell Tait, by the author, the license of the Revd Poole was suspended.

24. Baring, , Astounding Revelations, p. 16.Google Scholar

25. Anon, Left Home; or, Convent Life (London: P. Farrah, 1865), p. 10.Google Scholar

26. Left Home, p. 12.Google Scholar

27. Bernstein, , Confessional Subjects, p. 54.Google Scholar

28. Franchot, Jenny, Roads to Rome: The Antebellum Protestant Encounter with Catholicism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994), p. 123.Google Scholar

29. Michelet, J., Priests, Women, and Families (London: Protestant Evangelical Mission, 1874), p. 115.Google Scholar

30. Michelet, , Priests, p. 116.Google Scholar

31. Michelet, , Priests, p. 117.Google Scholar

32. Churchman, A., From the Curate to the Convent: A Narrative Belonging to the Latter Half of the Nineteenth Century (London: Haughton & Co., 1877), p. 408.Google Scholar

33. By 1861, eight editions of Michelet's book had appeared, with several in English. Anti-Catholic works also printed extracts of his book. For example, see Murphy, Patrick, Popery in Ireland; or Confessionals, Abductions, Nunneries, Fenians, and Orangemen (London: Jarrold and Sons, 1866)Google Scholar

34. Reed, , Glorious Battle, p. 187.Google Scholar

35. Davis, Charles Maurice, Philip Paternoster: A Tractarian Love Story (2 vols.; London: Richard Bentley, 1858), II, p. 65.Google Scholar

36. Brockman, H. J., Letter to the Women of England, on the Confessional (London: Protestant Electoral Union, 1867), p. 1.Google Scholar

37. Brockman, , Letter to the Women of England, p. 2.Google Scholar

38. Anon, Women and Priests (London: Haughton & Co., 1878), p. 3Google Scholar. Unlike other critiques of auricular confession, this short pamphlet also noted that the young, unmarried confessor might yield to the temptations of a woman.

39. Armstrong, John, The Confessional: Its Wickedness. A Lecture (Brighton: Edward Verrall, 1856), p. 7.Google Scholar

40. Seymour, M. Hobart, The Confessional: An Appeal to the Primitive and Catholic Forms of Absolution, in the East and in the West (London: Seeley, Jackson, & Halliday, 1870), p. 182.Google Scholar

41. ‘La Femme Dévote’, reprinted from Church Review, 26 08 1876.Google Scholar

42. Dadson, A., The High-Church Confessional: An Exposé (London: Wilkes & Co., 1880), p. 10.Google Scholar

43. Anon, Scandalous Revelations. The Confessional: An Exposure of its Mysteries and Iniquities as Practised in Foreign and English Convents by Priests and their Victims (London: W. H. Elliot, 1873), p. 4.Google Scholar

44. Shepherd, Margaret, The Confessional Unveiled (Boston: The British-American Citizen, 1890), p. 22.Google Scholar

45. Wolffe, John, The Protestant Crusade in Great Britain 1829–1860 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

46. See Liddon, H. P., Life of Edward Bouverie Pusey (4 vols.; London: Longmans, 1894), III.Google Scholar

47. See Buckland, A. R., The Confessional in the English Church (London: James Nisbet & Co., 1901), pp. 5–13Google Scholar. Gaume's book was published in 1837. It contained extracts from Roman Catholic theologians such as de Sales, Francis, Borromeo, Charles, and Neri, Philip, Reynolds, Michael, Martyr of Ritualism: Father Mackonochie of St. Alban's, Holborn (London: Faber and Faber, 1965), p. 215.Google Scholar

48. Yates, Nigel, Anglican Ritualism in Victorian Britain 1830–1910 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 71Google Scholar. For a history of the Society of the Holy Cross see Embry, J., The Catholic Movement and the Society of the Holy Cross (London: The Faith Press, 1931). Pages 97–127Google Scholar discuss the question of auricular confession and the support this practice received by members of the society.

49. Yates, , ‘Jesuits in Disguise’, p. 211.Google Scholar

50. Walsh, , The Secret History of the Oxford Movement, p. 94.Google Scholar

51. According to Reynolds, a Protestant layman, Robert Fleming, had received a copy of The Priest in Absolution from a prominent clergyman in the Anglican Church on the condition that he would not misuse it. Probably after consultation with members of the Church Association, he gave the book to the Earl of Redesdale in the summer of 1877. Reynolds, , Martyr of Ritualism, p. 215.Google Scholar

52. Chambers, J. C. (comp.), The Priest in Absolution: A Manual for Such As Are Called unto the Higher Ministries in the English Church (London: Joseph Masters, 2nd edn, 1869).Google Scholar

53. Chambers, , The Priest in Absolution, p. 14.Google Scholar

54. Chambers, , The Priest in Absolution, p. 20.Google Scholar

55. Chambers, , The Priest in Absolution, p. 24.Google Scholar

56. Chambers, J. C. (comp.), The Priest in Absolution: A Manual for Such As Are Called unto the Higher Ministries in the English Church, Part II (Privately Printed for the Use of the Clergy, 1870).Google Scholar

57. Chambers, , The Priest in Absolution, Part II, p. 21.Google Scholar

58. Chambers, , The Priest in Absolution, Part II, p. 23.Google Scholar

59. Chambers, , The Priest in Absolution, Part II, p. 29.Google Scholar

60. Chambers, , The Priest in Absolution, Part II, pp. 115–16.Google Scholar

61. Chambers, , The Priest in Absolution, Part II, pp. 152–53.Google Scholar

62. Chambers, , The Priest in Absolution, Part II, p. 154.Google Scholar

63. Chambers, , The Priest in Absolution, Part II, p. 159.Google Scholar

64. Chambers, , The Priest in Absolution, Part II, pp. 159–60.Google Scholar

65. Chambers, , The Priest in Absolution, Part II, p. 64.Google Scholar

66. Davidson, Randall Thomas and Benham, William, Life of Archibald Campbell Tait Archbishop of Canterbury vol. 2 (London: Macmillan and Co., 1891), p. 171.Google Scholar

67. Hansard Parliamentary Debates, 3rd ser., vol. 234 (1877), cols. 1741–45.Google Scholar

68. Hansard, cols. 1745–48.

69. Ellsworth, L. E., Charles Lowder and the Ritualist Movement (London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 1982), p. 139.Google Scholar

70. The Times, 15 06 1877.Google Scholar

71. The Times, 15 06 1877.Google Scholar

72. See, for example, The Times, 16 08 1877Google Scholar, 29 August 1877, and 31 August 1877.

73. Printed in Bentley, , Ritualism and Politics in Victorian Britain, p. 32.Google Scholar

74. Quoted in Davidson, and Benham, , Life of Archibald Campbell Tait, p. 176.Google Scholar

75. Quoted in Davidson, and Benham, , Life of Archibald Campbell Tait, p. 178.Google Scholar

76. Quoted in Davidson, and Benham, , Life of Archibald Campbell Tait, p. 178.Google Scholar

77. Yates, , ‘Jesuits in Disguise’, p. 203.Google Scholar

78. Yates, , ‘Jesuits in Disguise’, p. 215.Google Scholar