No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 April 2013
This paper seeks to explore the ‘hermeneutical gaps’ identified in a recent and ongoing investigation across the Anglican Communion into the way the Bible is read within worldwide Anglicanism. This investigation is of contemporary importance to the Anglican Communion as the Project's findings were recently presented to the 15th Anglican Consultative Council in October 2012. The ‘hermeneutical gaps’ which have been identified shed important insights into the strained fellowship which currently seems characteristic of the Communion. The approach of this paper is to evaluate whether these ‘gaps’ are symptomatic of an inevitable fracturing within the Communion or whether points of apparent disconnect in the use of the Bible are able to be bridged, held together or reconciled for the benefit of Anglicanism's common life.
Ordinand for the Diocese of Melbourne in the Anglican Church of Australia.
2. The Lambeth Commission on Communion, The Windsor Report (London: The Anglican Communion Office, 2004), §§ 61–62.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Lyon, S., ‘Mind the Gap! Reflections on the “Bible in the Life of the Church” Project’, Anglican Theological Review 93.3 (2011), pp. 451–464.Google Scholar
4. For this clarification I am grateful to the anonymous reviewer.Google Scholar
5. The Lambeth Commission on Communion, Windsor Report, § 61.Google Scholar
6. ‘To seek to transform unjust structures of society’ and ‘to strive to safeguard the integrity of creation and sustain and renew the life of the earth’. The Five Marks of Mission were developed by the Anglican Consultative Council between 1984 and 1990.Google Scholar
7. Although the content of these Bible studies was common, their implementation differed according to context. The project allows for and encourages this flexibility.Google Scholar
8. The Principal's Conference at the International Study Centre, Canterbury, was an initiative of the Theological Education in the Anglican Communion Steering Group gathering together principals and deans of theological colleges from across the Communion.Google Scholar
9. This is not intended to be a comprehensive account of the development of global Anglicanism. For further detail refer to, among others, Kaye, B., An Introduction to World Anglicanism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008); K. Ward, A History of Global Anglicanism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006); A. Wingate, K. Ward, C. Pemberton, and W. Sitshebo (eds.), Anglicanism: A Global Communion (London: Mowbray, 1998).Google Scholar
10. Ward, K., ‘The Development of Anglicanism as a Global Communion’, in A. Wingate, K. Ward, C. Pemberton and W. Sitshebo (eds.), Anglicanism: A Global Communion (London: Mowbray, 1998), p. 15.Google Scholar
11. Oxbrow, M., ‘Anglicans and Reconciling Mission: An Assessment of Two Anglican International Gatherings’, International Bulletin of Missionary Research 33.1 (2009), pp. 8–10 (10).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. The origin of this important phrase comes from Bishop Stephen Bayne's call to a renewal of missionary awareness across the Communion in the early 1960s, stemming from his role as the Executive Officer to both the Lambeth Consultative Body and the Advisory Council on Missionary Strategy which was an important forerunner to the establishment of the Anglican Consultative Council in 1968. See particularly his seminal report published as Bayne, S., and Advisory Council on Missionary Strategy, Mutual Responsibility and Interdependence in the Body of Christ: With Related Background Documents (London: SPCK, 1963).Google Scholar
13. Volf, M., Exclusion and Embrace: A Theological Exploration of Identity, Otherness and Reconciliation (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1996), p. 128.Google Scholar
14. Bosch, D., Transforming Mission (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1991), p. 390.Google Scholar
15. Inter-Anglican Theological and Doctrinal Commission, The Virginia Report (Harrisburg, PA: Morehouse, 1999), 2.16–2.26. The Virginia Report draws particularly on the work of the Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission in relating communion and mission, that is, the Commission's insistence that ‘[Ecclesial Communion] necessarily finds expression in shared commitment to the mission entrusted by Christ to his Church’. See Anglican Roman Catholic International Commission, The Church as Communion (Dublin: Anglican Communion Office, 1990), para. 45.Google ScholarPubMed
16. Avis, P., A Ministry Shaped by Mission (London: T & T Clark International, 2005), p. 5.Google Scholar
17. Davis, E., ‘The Bible and the Environment’: A Leadership Seminar for Theological Educators in the Episcopal Church of Sudan (Juba, Sudan, 2010), p. 1.Google Scholar
18. Lyon, ‘Mind the Gap!’, p. 459.Google Scholar
19. Rowland, C., ‘Reception History’, in P. Gooder (ed.), Searching for Meaning: An Introduction to Interpreting the New Testament (London: SPCK, 2009), p. 113.Google Scholar
20. The Lambeth Commission on Communion, Windsor Report, § 60.Google Scholar
21. Roark, C.M., ‘Hermeneutical Tools and their Use’, Southwestern Journal of Theology 35.3 (1993), p. 5.Google Scholar
22. British Regional Group, Report for Bible in the Life of the Church Meeting (Durban, 2010), p. 2.Google Scholar
23. Cuba User Group, Report for Bible in the Life of the Church Meeting (Durban, 2010).Google Scholar
24. Cuba User Group, Report, 2010.Google Scholar
25. Cuba User Group, Report for Bible in the Life of the Church Meeting (Woking, 2012), p. 4.Google Scholar
26. West, G.O., The Academy of the Poor (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1999), p. 26.Google Scholar
27. West, The Academy of the Poor, p. 32.Google Scholar
28. North America Regional Group, Report for Bible in the Life of the Church Meeting (Durban, 2010), p. 5.Google Scholar
29. North America Regional Group, Report.Google Scholar
30. Rukundwa, L.S., ‘Postcolonial Theory as a Hermeneutical Tool for Biblical Teaching’, Hervormde Teologiese Sstudies 64.1 (2008), pp. 339–351 (343).Google Scholar
31. Rukundwa, ‘Postcolonial Theory’, p. 345.Google Scholar
32. Thiselton, A., ‘Biblical Studies and Theoretical Hermeneutics’, in J. Barton (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Biblical Interpretation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 108.Google Scholar
33. Lyon, ‘Mind the Gap!’, p. 459.Google Scholar
34. For further research on how the Bible is used in relation to environmental and ecological concerns refer to the ‘Uses of the Bible in Environmental Ethics’ project funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council at the University of Exeter. Publications include: Horrell, D.G., The Bible and the Environment: Towards a Critical, Ecological Biblical Theology (London: Equinox, 2010); D.G. Horrell, C. Hunt, C. Southgate and F. Stavrakopoulou (eds.), Ecological Hermeneutics: Biblical, Historical and Theological Perspectives (London: T & T Clark, 2010).Google Scholar
35. The document is available at General Synod Environment Working Group of the Anglican Church of Australia, ‘Green by Grace (2004)’, http://www.environment.perth.anglican.org/documents/WG-Environment_Greenby%20Grace_.pdf (accessed 19 February 2012).Google Scholar
36. Australia Regional Group, Report for Bible in the Life of the Church Meeting (Durban, 2010), p. 4.Google Scholar
37. East Africa Regional Group, Report for Bible in the Life of the Church Meeting (Durban, 2010), p. 2.Google Scholar
38. This emphasis on evangelism was also identified within some parts of Australia as the dominant missionary mindset. See Australia Regional Group, Report, p. 4.Google Scholar
39. East Africa Regional Group, Report, p. 3.Google Scholar
40. East Africa Regional Group, Report, p. 4.Google Scholar
41. Brueggemann, W., Redescribing Reality: What We Do When We Read the Bible (London: SCM Press, 2009), p. 13.Google Scholar
42. Brueggemann, Redescribing Reality, p. 15.Google Scholar
43. World Council of Churches – Commission on Faith and Order, The Nature and Purpose of the Church (Geneva: World Council of Churches, 1998), para. 30.Google ScholarPubMed
44. British Regional Group, Report, p. 2.Google Scholar
45. East Africa Regional Group, Report, p. 3.Google Scholar
46. Cuba User Group, Report, p. 2.Google Scholar
47. North America Regional Group, Report, p. 1.Google Scholar
48. North America Regional Group, Report, p. 1.Google Scholar
49. North America Regional Group, Report, p. 1.Google Scholar
50. Murray, S.R., ‘Proof text or no text?’, Concordia Theological Quarterly 66.2 (2002), p. 170.Google Scholar
51. Brueggemann, Redescribing Reality, pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
52. British Regional Group, Report, 2.Google Scholar
53. Davis, E., ‘The Bible in the Life of the Sudanese Church’: A Report Submitted to the Anglican Communion Office (Duke Divinity School, 2011), p. 5.Google Scholar
54. Brueggemann, Redescribing Reality, p. 19.Google Scholar
55. Gorringe, T., ‘Political Readings of Scripture’, in J. Barton (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Biblical Interpretation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 74.Google Scholar
56. Brueggemann, Redescribing Reality, p. 19.Google Scholar
57. Gorringe, ‘Political Readings of Scripture’, p. 76.Google Scholar
58. Whitelam, K., ‘The Social World of the Bible’, in J. Barton (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Biblical Interpretation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 45.Google Scholar
59. Daley, B., ‘Is Patristic Exegesis Still Usable? Some Reflections on Early Christian Interpretation of the Psalms’, in E. Davis and R. Hays (eds.), The Art of Reading Scripture (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2003), p. 86.Google Scholar
60. Hartley, H.-A., Making Sense of the Bible (London: SPCK, 2011), p. 73.Google Scholar
61. Lundblad, B., Marking Time: Preaching Biblical Stories in Present Tense (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 2007), p. 74.Google Scholar
62. Hartley, Making Sense of the Bible, p. 64.Google Scholar
63. North America Regional Group, Report, 3.Google Scholar
64. East Africa Regional Group, Report, p. 2.Google Scholar
65. Holgate, D.Starr, R., SCM Studyguide to Biblical Hermeneutics (London: SCM Press, 2006), p. 131.Google Scholar
66. Rowland, C., Rees, B.Weston, R., ‘Practical Exegesis in Context’, in C. Rowland and J. Vincent (eds.), Bible and Practice (Sheffield: Urban Theology Unit, 2001), p. 11.Google Scholar
67. North America Regional Group, Report, pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
68. Van Leeuwen, R.C., ‘Reading the Bible Whole in a Culture of Divided Hearts’, Ex auditu 19 (2003), p. 11.Google Scholar
69. Van Leeuwen, ‘Reading the Bible Whole’, p. 6.Google Scholar
70. Holgate and Starr, Biblical Hermeneutics, p. 89.Google Scholar
71. Davis, ‘The Bible in the Life of the Sudanese Church’, p. 7.Google Scholar
72. Duffield, I., ‘From Bible to Ministry Projects’, in C. Rowland and J. Vincent (eds.), Bible and Practice (Sheffield: Urban Theology Unit, 2001), p. 75.Google Scholar
73. Nicholls, R., Walking on the Water : Reading Mt. 14:22–33 in the Light of its Wirkungsgeschichte (Biblical interpretation series; Leiden: Brill, 2008), p. 7.Google Scholar
74. Gadamer, H.-G., Truth and Method (London: Sheed & Ward, 1975), p. 301.Google Scholar
75. Nicholls, Walking on the Water, p. 9.Google Scholar
76. Village, A., The Bible and Lay People: An Empirical Approach to Ordinary Hermeneutics (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), p. 26.Google Scholar
77. Nicholls, Walking on the Water, p. 11.Google Scholar
78. Gadamer, Truth and Method, p. 302.Google Scholar
79. Thiselton, A.C., The Two Horizons: New Testament Hermeneutics and Philosophical Description with Special Reference to Heidegger, Bultmann, Gadamer, and Wittgenstein (Exeter: Paternoster, 1980), p. 168.Google Scholar
80. Virkler, H.A.Gerber, Karelynne, Hermeneutics: Principles and Processes of Biblical Interpretation (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2007), p. 19.Google Scholar
81. The Lambeth Commission on Communion, Windsor Report, § 62.Google Scholar
82. The full report, with accompanying resources, may be found at Bible in the Life of the Church Project, ‘Deep Engagement: Fresh Discovery’, Anglican Communion Office available at http://www.anglicancommunion.org/ministry/theological/bible/index.cfm (accessed 30 January 2013).Google Scholar
83. Ashton, L., ‘ACC Acclaims Project on the Bible’, Anglican Communion News Service, http://www.anglicancommunion.org/acns/news.cfm/2012/11/2/ACNS5231 (accessed 30 January 2013).Google Scholar
84. I am grateful to Stephen Lyon, Project Coordinator, for his reflections on the future of the Project and ways forward. If readers are interested in further resources and future developments he would welcome and encourage contact through the Anglican Communion Office. Contact details may be found at http://www.anglicancommunion.org/ministry/theological/bible/index.cfmGoogle Scholar
85. For these reflections I am grateful to Archbishop David Moxon, Chair of the Project's Steering Group.Google Scholar