Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:53:02.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Correspondence: Nerve–muscle specificity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2001

MASAHIKO Y. KIDA
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, 19-1 Uchimaru, Morioka 020, Japan

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A correspondence item entitled ‘A warning against revival of the classic tenets of gross anatomy related to nerve–muscle specificity’ was recently published in the Journal of Anatomy (Shinohara, 1996a). The present correspondent fully agrees with some aspects of his opinion, in particular, the 3 laws about applications which he described, and he also appreciates his approach to the argument based on the results of embryology and experimentation. However, his denial of morphological interpretations based on the theory of nerve–muscle specificity may be due to an incomplete understanding of the current status of the theory.

Type
Letter
Copyright
© Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1997