Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:46:27.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anastomosis at the level of the elbow joint connecting the deep, or normal, brachial artery with major arterial variations of the upper limb

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2000

J. R. SAÑUDO
Affiliation:
Unit of Anatomy and Embryology, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain
T. VÁZQUEZ
Affiliation:
Department of Morphological Sciences I, School of Medicine, University Complutense of Madrid, Spain
L. NEARN
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Cambridge University, UK
B. LOGAN
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Cambridge University, UK
I. PARKIN
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Cambridge University, UK
Get access

Abstract

Major variations of the principal arteries of the upper limb have long received the attention of anatomists. These variations can be summarised as the presence of 2 main arteries traversing the cubital fossa, a deep (or normal) brachial artery in coexistence with a superficial brachial, radial or ulnar artery. Anastomosis between these arterial trunks at elbow level has been reported in 1–6% of cases as an incidental finding in studies on the major arterial variations of the upper limb (Quain, 1844; Müller, 1903; Poynter, 1922; Adachi, 1928; McCormack et al. 1953; Wankoff, 1962; Rodríguez-Baeza et al. 1995). Only a single report (Ljubomudroff, 1927) has dealt specifically with the anastomosis.

The anatomical pattern of the anastomosis has been classified into 2 or 3 types depending on different morphological details. Three types have been described, taking into account its length, calibre and form (Quain, 1844) or the positions of the origin and number of recurrent radial arteries (Ljubomudroff, 1927). Two types have been described on the basis of whether the anastomosis coursed anterior or posterior to the bicipital tendon (McCormack et al. 1953). The aim of this study was to revisit these specific morphological details in a statistically reliable sample in order to catalogue the variations of the anastomosis and to provide an embryological explanation.

Type
Correspondence
Copyright
© Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)