Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 January 2009
Richard Schechner, the editor of the Tulane Drama Review, greeted Albee's Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? as a ‘persistent escape into morbid fantasy’. Like W. D. Maxwell, a member of the Pulitzer Prize advisory board, he found it a filthy play and indicted it for its ‘morbidity and sexual perversity which are there only to titillate an impotent and homosexual theatre and audience’. More perversely he saw in the play ‘an ineluctable urge to escape reality and its concomitant responsibilities by crawling back into the womb, or bathroom, or both’. His revulsion was shared by other critics who similarly misapprehended Albee's intention in a play which, far from endorsing illusion, remorselessly peels off protective fantasies in order to reach ‘the bone…the marrow’. Indeed, as Alan Schneider, the play's Broadway director, has asked, ‘is Albee not rather dedicated to smashing that rosy view, shocking us with the truth of our present-day behaviour and thought, striving to purge us into an actual confrontation with reality?’ (my italics).
page 257 note 1 Schechner, Richard, ‘TDR comment’, Tulane Drama Review, 7, iii (Spring 1963), 8–10Google Scholar.
page 257 note 2 Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1965), p. 125Google Scholar. Subsequent references to this edition will appear in the text.
page 257 note 3 Schneider, Alan ‘Why So Afraid?’, Tulane Drama Review, 7, iii (Spring 1963) p. 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
page 257 note 4 Ibsen, HenrikFour Great Plays by Ibsen, trans. Sharp, R. Farquharson (New York, 1959), p. 294Google Scholar.
page 257 note 5 Ibid. p. 277.
page 258 note 1 Woolf, Virginia, To The Lighthouse (London, 1960), p. 54Google Scholar.
page 258 note 2 Ibid. p. 102.
page 258 note 3 Ibid. p. 13.
page 259 note 1 St Augustine, , The Confessions of St Augustine, trans. Rev. Pusey, E. D. (Oxford, 1938), p. 29Google Scholar.
page 261 note 1 Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, Faust—Part Two, trans. Wayne, Philip (Harmondsworth, 1959), p. 277Google Scholar.
page 262 note 1 Quoted in Blackham, H. J., Six Existentialist Thinkers, (London, 1953), p. 28Google Scholar.
page 262 note 2 Bellow, Saul, Seize the Day (New York, 1956), p. 66Google Scholar.
page 263 note 1 Quoted in ‘Towards a theatre of cruelty’, Times Literary Supplement, no. 3235 (27 02 1964), p. 166Google Scholar.
page 263 note 2 Spengler, Oswald, The Decline of the West, trans. Atkinson, C. F., vol. ii (London, 1926–1928), p. 104Google Scholar.
page 264 note 1 Goldman, Mark, ‘Virginia Woolf and E. M. Forster: a critical dialogue’, Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 7, iv (Winter 1965), 391Google Scholar.
page 264 note 2 Gelber, Jack, The Connection (London, 1961), p. 62Google Scholar.
page 266 note 1 Quoted in Ionesco, Eugene, Notes and Counter-Notes (London, 1964), p. 92Google Scholar.
page 266 note 2 Camus, Albert, The Collected Fiction of Albert Camus, trans. Gilbert, Stuart and O'Brien, Justin (London, 1963), p. 69Google Scholar.
page 267 note 1 Bergson, Henri, Laughter, trans. Brereton, C. and Rothwell, F. (London, 1911), p. 198Google Scholar.
page 267 note 2 Quoted in ‘ Towards a theatre of cruelty ’, Times Literary Supplement, no. 3235 (27 02 1964), p. 166Google Scholar.
page 267 note 3 Gassner, John, Directions in Modern Theatre and Drama (New York, 1965), p. 358Google Scholar.
page 267 note 4 O'Neill, Eugene, ‘ Strindberg and our theatre ’, in O'Neill and His Plays, ed. Fagin, N. B. and Fisher, W. T. (New York, 1961), p. 108Google Scholar.
page 267 note 5 Schneider, Alan, ‘Reality is not enough’, Tulane Drama Review, 9, iii (Spring 1965), p. 148CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
page 267 note 6 Albee, Edward, ‘Which theatre is the absurd one?’ in Directions in Modern Theatre and Drama, Gassner, John (New York, 1965), pp. 334–5Google Scholar.
page 268 note 1 Galsworthy, John, ‘ Some platitudes concerning drama ’, in Playwrights on Playwriting, ed. Cole, Toby (London, 1960), p. 47Google Scholar.