Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:15:57.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wealth and/or Love: Class and Gender in the Cross-class Romance Films of the Great Depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2012

STEPHEN SHAROT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A combination of social and cultural changes account for the popularity of, and the narrative permutations of class and gender in, the cross-class romance films of the 1930s. The analysis is based on a sample of eighty-five cross-class romance films released in the 1929–39 period. The films deal with a dilemma evident in the choice of partners: between interests of wealth and social status and the value of romantic, disinterested love, an ideal which had spread throughout the class structure. Gender distinctions are reinforced by narratives in which the wealthy male is redeemed by the poor female so that he can perform the appropriate male gender roles. When the female is wealthy, the poor male insists on her economic dependence on him. Films with gold diggers reached a peak in the early 1930s and provided imaginary solutions to social anxieties about class and gender among both women and men.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 89 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ross, Steven J., Working-Class Hollywood: Silent Film and the Shaping of Class in America (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1998), 335–36Google Scholar; May, Larry, The Big Tomorrow: Hollywood and the Politics of the American Way (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2000), 282Google Scholar; Sharot, Stephen, “Class Rise as a Reward for Disinterested Love: Cross-class Romance Films, 1915–28,” Journal of Popular Culture, 43, 3 (2010), 583–99, 584–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 May, 282, provides a graph that shows that, of a sample of the films reviewed in the trade journal Motion Picture Herald between 1915 and 1940, films featuring marriage or romance across class lines varied from 10% to almost a quarter. After the rapid drop in such films from the late 1930s, May found only one cross-class romance film in his sample for 1946, and although his graph shows some increase in the early 1950s this is followed by another drop, with no cross-class romance film in 1958, when the survey ends.

3 The case for “pre-Code Hollywood” was made by Sklar, Robert, Movie-Made America: A Cultural History of American Movies (New York: Vintage Books, 1994; first published 1975, 175–9Google Scholar, and more recently by Doherty, Thomas, Pre-Code Hollywood: Sex, Immorality, and Insurrection in American Cinema (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999)Google Scholar. A critique of such formulations is provided by Maltby, Richard, “More Sinned against than Sinning: The Fabrications of ‘Pre-Code Cinema,’” Senses of Cinema, 29 (2003)Google Scholar, online journal. See also Jacobs, Lea, The Wages of Sin: Censorship and the Fallen Woman film, 1928–1942 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

4 A formula is a “combination or synthesis of specific cultural conventions with a more universal story form or archetype.” Cawelti, John G., Adventure, Mystery, and Romance: Formula Stories as Art and Popular Culture (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1976), 6Google Scholar.

5 Bergman, Andrew, We're in the Money: Depression America and Its Films (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1992; first published 1971)Google Scholar.

6 Stokes, Melvyn, “Female Audiences of the 1920s and early 1930s,” in Stokes, Melvyn and Maltby, Richard (eds.), Identifying Hollywood's Audiences (London: British Film Institute, 1999), 42–60Google Scholar.

7 Mulvey, Laura, “Unmasking the Gaze: Feminist Film Theory, History, and Film Studies,” in Callahan, Vicki (ed.), Reclaiming the Archive: Feminism and Film History (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2010), 17–31Google Scholar.

8 Tudor, Andrew, “Sociology and Film,” in Hill, John and Gibson, Pamela Church (eds.), The Oxford Guide to Film Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 190–94Google Scholar.

9 I constructed my sample from the AFI catalogue by reading plot outlines of films under a number of subject categories, including class distinction, employer–employee relations, social climbers, factory workers, sales clerks, upper class, factory owners, factory workers, gold digger, and department stores.

10 Markantonatou, Maira, “Gold-Diggers,” in Ditmore, Melissa Hope (ed.), Encyclopedia of Prostitution and Sex Work (Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing, 2006), 187Google Scholar.

11 Meyerowitz, Joanne Jay, Women Adrift: Independent Wage Earners in Chicago, 1880–1930 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991)Google Scholar.

12 Janet Straiger, “Les Belles Dames sans Merci, Femmes Fatales, Vampires, Vamps, and Gold Diggers: The Transformation and Narrative Value of Aggressive Fallen Women,” in Callahan, 32–57, 41.

13 The American Film Institute lists only one film with a gold digger theme in 1929 (Gold Diggers of Broadway), but as the Depression deepened the number increased: six in 1930, nine in 1931, 10 in 1932, and 14 in 1933. The AFI listing is not comprehensive, but it indicates the trend. The prominence of the gold digger in the early 1930s was also evident in popular music. Scheurer, Timothy E., “Goddesses and Golddiggers: Images of Women in Popular Music of the 1930s,” Journal of Popular Culture, 24 (1990), 23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Sharot, Class Rise as a Reward for Disinterested Love, 585.

15 Illouz, Eva, Consuming the Romantic Utopia: Love and the Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997)Google Scholar; Bailey, Beth L., From Front Porch to Back Seat: Courtship in Twentieth-Century America (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988)Google Scholar.

16 Illouz, 210–11; Bottero, Wendy, Stratification: Social Division and Inequality (London: Routledge, 2005), 166–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Haag, Pamela S., “In Search of ‘The Real Thing’: Ideologies of Love, Modern Romance, and Women's Sexual Subjectivity in the United States, 1920–40,” Journal of the History of Sexuality, 2, 4 (1992), 547–77, 553–56, 573–77Google Scholar.

18 Illouz, 53–55, 66–74; Clement, Elizabeth Alive, Love For Sale: Courting, Treating, and Prostitution in New York City, 1900–1945 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2006), 43–44, 213–21Google Scholar.

19 Susman, Warren, Culture as History: The Transformation of American Society in the Twentieth Century (New York: Pantheon, 1984), xxi–xxivGoogle Scholar; Barnard, Rita, The Great Depression and the Culture of Abundance: Kenneth Fearing, Nathanael West, and Mass Culture in the 1930s (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 19–31Google Scholar; Cohen, Lizabeth, “The Class Experience of Mass Consumption: Workers as Consumers in Interwar America,” in Fox, Richard Wightman and Lears, T.J. Jackson (eds.), The Power of Culture: Critical Essays in American History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993), 135–60, 138–41Google Scholar; Cross, Gary S., An All-Consuming Century: Why Consumerism Won in Modern America (New York: Columbia University Press, 2000), 67–82Google Scholar.

20 Chafe, William H., The Paradox of Change: American Women in the 20th Century (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 67–71, 116–17Google Scholar.

21 Ware, Susan, Holding Their Own: American Women in the 1930s (Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1982), 33–34Google Scholar; Helmbold, Lois Rita, “Downward Occupational Mobility during the Great Depression: Urban Black and White Working Class Women,” Labor History, 29 (1988), 132–72, 137–38, 152–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Chafe, 71, 101.

23 Hapke, Laura, Daughters of the Great Depression: Women, Work, and Fiction in the American 1930s (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1995), 183Google Scholar.

24 Dalton, [Susan] Elizabeth, “Women at Work: Warners in the 1930s,” in Kay, Karyn and Peary, Gerald (eds.), Women and the Cinema: A Critical Anthology (New York: E.P. Dutton, 1977), 267–81Google Scholar; Galerstein, Carolyn L., Working Women on the Hollywood Screen (New York: Garland Publishing Inc., 1989), xv–xviiGoogle Scholar.

25 Chafe, 69–71, 81–82, 91–92, 97, 101, 115–17; Scharf, Lois, To Work and To Wed: Female Employment, Feminism, and the Great Depression (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1980), 92, 95, 108Google Scholar.

26 McLaren, Angus, Sexual Blackmail: A Modern History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002), 170–74Google Scholar.

27 Scharf, 140–41; Kleinberg, S. J., Women in the United States, 1930–1945 (London: Macmillan Press, 1999), 246CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Komarovsky, Nira, The Unemployed Man and His Family: The Effects of Unemployment upon the Status of the Man in Fifty-Nine Families (New York: Octagon Books, 1971; first published 1940), 29Google Scholar.

29 Kerbo, Harold R., Social Stratification and Inequality: Class Conflict in the United States (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983), 345Google Scholar.

30 For class passing see Foster, Gwendolyn Audrey, Class-Passing: Social Mobility in Film and Popular Culture (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2005)Google Scholar, who fails, however, to make a clear distinction between class passing and class mobility.

31 Sonnet, Esther, “Ladies Love Brutes: Reclaiming Female Pleasures in the Lost History of Hollywood Gangster Cycles, 1929–1931,” in Grieveson, Lee, Sonnet, Esther, and Stanfield, Peter (eds.), Mob Culture: Hidden Histories of the American Gangster Film (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2005), 93–119, 98Google Scholar.

32 Fishbein, Leslie, “The Harlot's Progress in American Fiction and Film, 1900–1930,” Women's Studies, 16 (1989), 409–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Meyerowitz, Women Adrift, 126–41.

33 McLaren, 175–81.

34 Curry, Ramona, Too Much of a Good Thing: Mae West as Cultural Icon (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996), 78–79Google Scholar.

35 Jacobs, The Wages of Sin, 82–83.

36 We only hear about her return to the industrial town. We do not see it because Stanwyck was unavailable to film additional scenes. Jacobs states that, in most of the gold digger films in which the gold digger is triumphant, the ending is at odds with the more typical romantic or sentimental classical happy end, but her own analysis of the films shows that happy endings with gold diggers who have retained their cynicism were the exception rather than the rule. Jacobs, 52–84, 132–49.

37 On the differences among gold diggers in Gold Diggers of 1933 see Babington, Bruce and Evans, Peter Williams, Blue Skies and Silver Linings: Aspects of the Hollywood Musical (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1985), 59–64Google Scholar.

38 The pre-Code films of Mae West were exceptional insofar as there was as much emphasis on the sexual pleasure she received from men, expressed in her verbal ripostes, and from presenting herself as sexual spectacle as from the material benefits that she received from her exploitation of sexuality.

39 Jacobs, 113–18.

40 Sklar, Movie-Made America; Doherty, Pre-Code Hollywood.

41 Maltby, “More Sinned against than Sinning.”

42 Maltby.

43 Brauer, Ralph A., “When the Lights Went Out: Hollywood, the Depression, and the Thirties,” in Marsden, Michale T., Nachbar, Johen G., and Grogg, Sam L. Jr. (eds.), Movies as Artifacts: Cultural Criticism of Popular Film (Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1982), 25–43, 29Google Scholar.

44 Smedley, Nick, A Divided World: Hollywood Cinema and Emigré Directors in the Era of Roosevelt and Hitler, 1933–1948 (Bristol: Intellect, 2011), 47Google Scholar.

45 Maltby. See also Jacobs; and Vasey, Ruth, The World According to Hollywood, 1918–1939 (Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 1997), especially 131–32Google Scholar.