Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:04:35.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frontierism, Capital, and the American Loyalists in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

Howard Temperley
Howard Temperley
Affiliation:
Howard Temperley is Editor of the Journal of American Studies and Senior Lecturer in American History at the University of East AngliaNorwich. He wishes to thank Wallace Brown, Ann Condon, Greg Palmer, and Peter A. Russell for their assistance in the preparation of this paper, an earlier version of which was delivered to the annual conference of the British Association for Canadian Studies in April 1978.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Everyone agrees that the American Loyalists had a hard time of it. Not only were they on the losing side in a long and cruel war — in their case rendered particularly bitter by virtue of being a civil war — but when hostilities ended they found themselves deprived of possessions, forced into exile, severed from relations and friends, and obliged to adapt to unfamiliar customs and surroundings. For those who took refuge in what remained of British North America, as approximately half of them did — some 40,000 in all — starting over again involved special difficulties. Winters there were long and cold, and the territories in which they found themselves were mostly still in a state of nature, uncultivated, unmapped, and in some cases virtually unexplored. Indeed, how suitable these lands were for settlement was at first by no means clear. “ Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Canada,” observed William Cobbett, who visited the Maritimes shortly after the arrival of the first exiles, “ are the horns, the head, the neck, the shins and the hoof of the ox, and the United States are the ribs, the sirloin, the kidneys, and the rest of the body.” This was not entirely true, but it was a notion which must have crossed the minds of many of the refugees themselves as, wintering in their camps, they contemplated the wilderness around them.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , April 1979 , pp. 5 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Reitzel, William, ed., The Autobiography of William Cobbett (London: Faber and Faber, 1933), p. 28Google Scholar.

2 Raymond, W. O., ed., Kingston and the Loyalists of the Spring Fleet of A.D. 1783 … to Which is Appended a Diary Written by Sarah Frost … (Saint John, New Brunswick: Barnes and Co., 1889), p. 30Google Scholar.

3 Campbell, Patrick, Travels in the Interior and Inhabited Parts of North America in the Years 1791 and 1792 (Toronto: The Champlain Society, 1937), p. 25Google Scholar.

4 “ Extract from the Journal of Charles Turner ” Acadiensis, 7 (1907), 130Google Scholar.

5 Campbell, pp. 123–24.

6 Hunter, A., ed., The Journal of Gen. Sir Martin Hunter … And Some Letters of His Wife (Edinburgh: The Edinburgh Press, 1894), p. 219Google Scholar.

7 Temperley, Howard, ed., The New Brunswick Journals of Lt. Col. Joseph Gubbins, 1811 and 1813 (New Brunswick: Kings Landing Corporation, forthcoming), entry for 20 07 1811Google Scholar.

8 Turner, 's seminal essays in the subject are collected in his The Frontier in American History (New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1920)Google Scholar.

9 For a discussion of Canadian historians' use of Turnerian theories see Careless, J. M. S., “Frontierism, Metropolitanism, and Canadian History,” Canadian Historical Review, 35 (1954), 1–21, esp. 6–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Gubbins, entry for 20 July 1811.

11 Tuttle, William M., “ Forerunners of Frederick Jackson Turner: Nineteenth Century British Conservatives and the Frontier Thesis,” Agricultural History, 31 (1967), 219–28Google Scholar.

12 Brogan, Hugh, “ America and Walter Bagehot,” Journal of American Studies, 11 (1977), 335–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Quoted in ibid., p. 353.

14 Gubbins, entry for 23 July 1811.

15 Quoted in Craig, Gerald M., Early Travellers in the Canadas, 1791–1867 (Toronto: Macmillan and Co., 1955), p. xxxiGoogle Scholar.

16 Reitzel, , ed., Autobiography of William Cobbett, p. 28Google Scholar.

17 Craig, , Early Travellers, p. 63Google Scholar.

18 The advertisement is quoted in Lawrence, J. W., The Judges of New Brunswick and their Times (Saint John, 1907), p. 34Google Scholar. The Heriot watercolour of the Ludlow house was done in 1807. See also the watercolour by Lieutenant Villiers reproduced in Gubbins.

19 Gubbins, entries for 12, 18, 22 July 1811.

20 See, for example, MacNutt, W. S., New Brunswick: A History, 1784–1867 (Toronto: Macmillan and Co., 1963)Google Scholar, Chap. 5. These attempts to foster a social order in the colonies that would make them amenable to British control were not new. For an account of Britain's efforts to set up Prince Edward Island as a “ new style ” colony see MacNutt, W. S., The Atlantic Provinces: The Emergence of Colonial Society, 1712–1857 (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1965), pp. 64–66Google Scholar.

21 For a general discussion of these issues see the early sections of Craig, Gerald M., Upper Canada: The Formative Years, 1784–1841 (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1963)Google Scholar.

22 Campbell, pp. 123–25.

23 Britain, Great, Parliamentary Papers, 1810–11 (1994) 10, 77Google Scholar.

24 Brown, Wallace, The King's Friends: The Composition and Motives of the American Loyalist Claimants (Providence: Brown University Press, 1965)Google Scholar, and The Good Americans: The Loyalists in the American Revolution (New York: William Morrow and Co., 1969), pp. 180–90Google Scholar; Norton, Mary Beth, The British-Americans: The Loyalist Exiles in England, 1774–1789 (Boston: Little Brown and Co., 1972)Google Scholar.

25 A chronological listing of the claims heard by Dundas and Pemberton can be found in the Audit Office (AO) 12 Series, in the Public Record Office, London, 120. The Commissioners' Minute Books, which give their itinerary, are in AO 12, 98.

26 Eardley-Wilmot, John, Historical View of the Commission for Enquiry into the Losses, Services, and Claims of the American Loyalists at the Close of the War between England and her Colonies in 1783, with an Account of the Compensation Granted to Them by Parliament in 1785 and 1788 (London: Nichols, Son and Bentley, 1815), p. 75Google Scholar.

27 An alphabetical listing of claimants, showing the amounts claimed and the sums allowed will be found in the appendix to the Commissioners' Twelfth Report in AO 12, 109. Claims heard in British North America are listed separately at the end of each section. More detailed information — e.g. claims disallowed, claimants places of residence, the nature of the losses incurred — can be found in the brief summaries sent home by Dundas and Pemberton in AO 12, 57–70.

28 Fellows, Jo-Ann, “ The Loyalist Myth in Canada,” in Canadian Historical Association, Historical Papers (1971), p. 106Google Scholar.

29 As Chief Justice, Ludlow's salary was £750 a year. Britain, Great, Parliamentary Papers, 1810–11 (1994) 10, 77Google Scholar.

30 Gubbins, entry for 3 July 1811. Saunders's award is listed in AO 12, 109. It is also worth noting that, like some other wealthy New Brunswickers, Saunders found it difficult to obtain a clear tide to his property. See Condon, Ann, “ The Envy of the American States: The Settlement of the Loyalists in New Brunswick: Goals and Achievements ” (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 1975), pp. 354–57Google Scholar.

31 Gubbins, entries for 11, 13 and 24 July 1811. William Harding had asked for £620 and received £127; David Blakeney had asked for £147 and received £54; and Seth Sealy had asked for £650 and received £250. AO 12, 57, 18; 68, 75; 109, 94, 170, 278; Fraser, Alexander, ed., Second Report of the Bureau of Archives for the Province of Ontario, 1904 (Toronto: L. K. Cameron, 1905), p. 259Google Scholar.

32 Lord George Germain to Sir Henry Clinton, 23 Jan. 1779, in Debrett, J., The Parliamentary Register or History of the Proceedings and Debates of the House of Commons (London, 1783), 10, 248Google Scholar.

33 Katcher, Philip R. N., King George's Army, 1775–1783: A Handbook of British, American and German Regiments (Harrisbury, Pennsylvania, and London: Osprey, 1973), pp. 83, 88, 92, 98Google Scholar.

34 Debrett, pp. 237–47; Cobbett, William, The Parliamentary History of England (London, 1806–1820), 23, 1050–58Google Scholar.

35 Army Lists, 1784–1839. According to Gubbins, Coffin received word of his promotion to Lieutenant General while in the art of retailing cabbages at the Saint John market. Gubbins, entry for 27 July 1813.

36 Debrett, p. 238; Cobbett, , Parliamentary History, 23, 1053Google Scholar.

37 Both the War Office (WO) and Paymaster General's (PMG) files are in the Public Record Office, London. The WO 12 series gives separate listings, by regiment, of half-pay officers on the American Establishment, from 1783 to 1813. The PMG 4 Series shows actual payments made and, from 1807 onwards, the addresses of recipients. Officers on the British Establishment are listed separately and no addresses, apart from those of their London agents, are given.

38 From 1783 to 1850 these amounts never changed. They were, however, of sufficient interest to colonists to be included in the New Brunswick Almanac of 1795 (Saint John, 1795)Google Scholar.

39 Hunter, A., Journals of Sir Martin Hunter, p. 217Google Scholar.

40 Campbell, p. 282.

41 PMG 11 series, 53 and 54.

42 Besides half-pay, many leading Loyalists drew military allowances – for example as “ Fort Majors.” The 1790 files list 59 Fort Majors and the 1813 files 38. Among those who served in this capacity throughout the period were David Fanning, Christopher Billop and Abiather Camp. The size of the allowances bore little relation to rank, evidently varying according to the nature of the duties required. WO 24 Series, 748–62.

43 Paine, Thomas, “ Common Sense,” in Conway, Moncure D., ed., The Writings of Thomas Paine (New York, 1894), 1, 84Google Scholar.

44 Eardley-Wilmot, pp. 55–56.

45 “ The sums expended under the head of ‘ Dead Weight,’ consisting of retired full-pay, civil superannuations, and allowances to the army and navy, is equal to the revenue of many powerful states,” [Wade, John,] The Extraordinary Black Book an Exposition of the … Income, Privileges, and Power of the Aristocracy … with Lists of Pluralists, Placemen, Pensioners, and Sinecurists … (London: Effingham Wilson, 1831), p. 396Google Scholar. For specific strictures on half-pay, see pp. 396–98, 401, 549. Half-pay and promotion by seniority caused particular problems after the Napoleonic wars: see Gash, N., “ After Waterloo: Society and the Legacy of the Napoleonic Wars,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th Series, 28 (1978), 145–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Widows' petitions and other claims by Loyalist dependents are filed alphabetically in the WO 42 Series, 59–63.

47 So also did their dependents. Catherine Van Cortlandt, for example received a widow's pension of £70 a year together with a Royal Bounty of £130 a year and a further pension from the Treasury of £44 a year. PMG 11 Series Vols. 11–23.

48 WO 42 Series, 59, 430–31. Lawrence, J. W. notes that Chipman had continued to draw his half-pay of £91 a year while also receiving £960 a year from the British Government as a Boundary Commissioner, Judges of New Brunswick, p. 196Google Scholar.

49 For a discussion of this issue see Craig, Upper Canada, Chap. 2; also Gates, Lillian F., Land Policies of Upper Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1968)Google Scholar.