Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T06:12:10.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

American History in Comparative Perspective1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

Walter Hugins
Walter Hugins
Affiliation:
S.U.N.Y. Binghamton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Comparative history is as old as Herodotus, but only in the past quartercentury has it come into its own as an academic discipline. Yet historians, scholars of American history in particular, have generally fallen behind their colleagues in the other social sciences in developing and applying comparative methodology or models which could illuminate their teaching or open new vistas in their research. As a result, teaching and scholarship in United States history tend to be characterized by parochialism, ethnocentricity and an emphasis upon American uniqueness or “ exceptionalism.” Political scientists, sociologists and economists have increasingly studied the process of development and modernization since the end of World War II, doing more to stimulate comparative studies than all of their predecessors during the past century. While many of these social scientists have demonstrated only a superficial knowledge of history, leading them often to deal statically with the societies they are studying, some of them have at least made the effort, avoided by most American historians, to apply the comparative method to American history.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , April 1977 , pp. 27 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 New York, 1968.

3 Ibid., p. viii.

4 “ Toward a Comparative History of European Societies,” in Lane, Frederic C. and Riemersma, J. C., eds., Enterprise and Secular Change (Homewood, Ill., 1953), pp. 494–95, 498Google Scholar.

5 “ Diachronic Methods in Comparative Politics,” in Holt, Robert T. and Turner, John E., Methodology of Comparative Research (New York, 1970), pp. 343–58Google Scholar. See also Grew, Raymond and Thrupp, Sylvia L., “ Horizontal History in Search of a Vertical Dimension,” Comparative Studies in Society and History [hereafter cited as CSSH], 8 (1965–1966), 258–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 2 vols. (Princeton, 1959–64).

7 See for example Mazlish, Bruce, “ The French Revolution in Comparative Perspective,” Political Science Quarterly, 85 (06 1970), 240–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Moore, Barrington Jr, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World (Boston, 1966), pp. 111–55Google Scholar.

9 World Politics, 13 (01 1962), 210–11Google Scholar.

10 See the collection edited by Greene, Jack P., The Reinterpretation of the American Revolution, 1763–1789 (New York, 1968)Google Scholar.

11 The First New Nation: The United States in Historical and Comparative Perspective (New York, 1963), esp. pp. 1–35Google Scholar. See also his essay, “ History and Sociology: Some Methodological Considerations,” in Lipset, and Hofstadter, Richard, eds., Sociology and History: Methods (New York, 1968), pp. 45–51Google Scholar.

12 Lipset, and Bendix, Reinhard, Social Mobility in Industrial Society (Berkeley, 1959)Google Scholar; Lipset, and Rokkan, Stein, eds., Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives (New York, 1967)Google Scholar; Lipset, , Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics (Garden City, 1959)Google Scholar.

13 Lipset, , First New Nation, esp. pp. 13–98Google Scholar; the quotation is from p. 91. See also his essay, “ The ‘Newness’ of the New Nation,” in Woodward, , Comparative Approach, pp. 67–79Google Scholar; and a similar analysis by Deutsch, Karl W. et al. , Political Community and the North Atlantic Area (Princeton, 1957)Google Scholar.

14 Political Parties in a New Nation: The American Experience, 1776–1809 (New York, 1963)Google Scholar; see esp. his chapter on “Modern Politics and Popular Parties,” pp. 95–112.

15 Hartz, Louis et al. , The Founding of New Societies: Studies in the History of the United States, Latin America, South Africa, Canada, and Australia (New York, 1964), esp. pp. 3–23Google Scholar.

16 New York, 1955.

17 Demos, John, A Little Commonwealth: Family Life in Plymouth Colony (New York, 1970)Google Scholar; Greven, Philip J. Jr, Four Generations: Population, Land and Family in Andover, Massachusetts (Ithaca, 1970)Google Scholar; Lockridge, Kenneth, A New England Town: The First Hundred Years (New York, 1970)Google Scholar; Henretta, James, “ Economic Development and Social Structure in Colonial Boston,” William and Mary Quarterly, 22 (1965), 75–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Main, Jackson Turner, The Social Structure of Revolutionary America (Princeton, 1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Pluvier, Jan, South-East Asia from Colonialism to Independence (Kuala Lumpur, 1974), pp. 22–91Google Scholar; see also Benda, Harry J., “ Political Elites in Colonial Southeast Asia: An Historical Analysis,” CSSH, 7 (1965), 233–51Google Scholar.

19 See for example Thistlethwaite, Frank, The Anglo-American Connection in the Early Nineteenth Century (Philadelphia, 1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 (Cambridge, 1960), p. 1. This is largely an elaboration of Rostow's article, “ The Take-off into Sustained Growth,” Economic Journal, 66 (03 1956), 25–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 An example of this rhetoric is Luther, Seth, “ An Address to the Working Men of New England,” in Hugins, Walter, ed., The Reform Impulse, 1825–1850 (New York, 1972), pp. 93–98Google Scholar.

22 Shortly after publication of the book, a conference of the International Economic Association was held at Konstanz, Germany, in the summer of 1960 to debate many of the issues raised by Rostow; a total of 16 papers were presented. After participating in the conference, Rostow edited the proceedings which were published under the title of The Economics of Take-off into Sustained Growth (New York, 1963)Google Scholar. The second edition of the Stages, published in 1971, added a 70-page Appendix, entitled “ The Critics and the Evidence.” For criticisms of Rostow's thesis other than those at the conference, see Cameron, Rondo E., “ Comparative Economic Progress,” CSSH, 3 (1960–1961), 231–39Google Scholar; Black, C. E., The Dynamics of Modernization: A Study in Comparative History (New York, 1966), p. 191Google Scholar; Aron, Raymond, The Industrial Society: Three Essays on Ideology and Development (New York, 1967), pp. 29–35Google Scholar; the quotation is from ibid., p. 29.

23 Rostow, , Stages of Economic Growth, pp. 4–92 and passimGoogle Scholar.

24 The most devastating criticism by an economist was the paper by Simon Kuznets, “ Notes on the Take-off,” and his comments during the general discussion at the conference; see Rostow, , Economics of Take-off, pp. 22–43, 315–24Google Scholar. See also the papers by H. J. Habakkuk, J. Marczewski and Alexander Gershenkorn in ibid., pp. 63–82, 119–38, 151–69.

25 North, Douglass C., Growth and Welfare in the American Past (Englewood Cliffs, 1966), pp. 86–89Google Scholar. His earlier writings foreshadowed this explicit criticism; see his paper, “ Industrialization in the United States, 1815–60,” and the discussion which followed, in Rostow, , Economics of Take-off, pp. 44–62, 324–34Google Scholar; and his Economic Growth of the United States, 1790–1860 (Englewood Cliffs, 1961)Google Scholar, esp. chs. i and vii. For Bruchey's criticism, see his Roots of American Economic Growth, 1607–1861 (New York, 1965), pp. 85–87, 161Google Scholar.

26 North, , Growth and Welfare, pp. 31, 75–85Google Scholar.

27 Bruchey, , Roots of Economic Growth, pp. 9–15Google Scholar; for his discussion of non-economic factors, see pp. 178–207. His Introduction to the 1968 Torchbook edition is entitled “ The Rise of the New Economic History,” and is mildly critical of the quantifiers.

28 Heilbroner, Robert L., The Great Ascent: The Struggle for Economic Development in Our Time (New York, 1963), pp. 24–29Google Scholar. See also Fischer, Wolfram, “ Social Tensions at Early Stages of Industrialization,” CSSH, 9 (1966–1967), 64–83Google Scholar; and Black, , Dynamics of Modernization, pp. 26–34Google Scholar.

29 Rostow, Walt W., Politics and the Stages of Growth (London, 1971), pp. 184–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Apter, David E., “ Political Systems and Development Change,” in Holt, and Turner, , Methodology of Comparative Research, pp. 157–58Google Scholar. See also Black, , Dynamics of Modernization, pp. 5–26, 46–55Google Scholar.

31 Apter, “ Political Systems and Developmental Change,” p. 153. See also his Politics of Modernization (Chicago, 1965)Google Scholar; and Almond, Gabriel A. and Coleman, James S., eds., The Politics of Developing Areas (Princeton, 1960)Google Scholar.

32 Riggs, Fred W., Administration in Developing Countries: The Theory of Prismatic Society (New York, 1964)Google Scholar; see also his Thailand: The Modernization of a Bureaucratic Polity (Honolulu, 1966)Google Scholar.

33 LaPalombara, Joseph, “ Parsimony and Empiricism in Comparative Politics: An Anti-Scholastic View,” in Holt, and Turner, , Methodology of Comparative Research, pp. 125–49, esp. 126–29, 134Google Scholar.

34 Eisenstadt, S. N., “ Post-Traditional Societies and the Continuity and Reconstruction of Tradition,” in Eisenstadt, , ed., Post-Traditional Societies (New York, 1972), pp. 1–27Google Scholar. See also his “ Modernization: Growth and Diversity,” India Quarterly, 20 (01–03 1964), 17–42Google Scholar; Modernization: Protest and Change (Englewood Cliffs, 1966)Google Scholar; “ Transformation of Social, Political, and Cultural Orders in Modernization,” in Eisenstadt, , ed., Comparative Perspectives in Social Change (Boston, 1968)Google Scholar; and “ Sociological Analysis of Historical Societies,” CSSH, 6 (1963–1964), 481–89Google Scholar.

35 Virtually the only study of technological development is Habakkuk, H. J., American and British Technology in the 19th Century (Cambridge, 1962)Google Scholar; see also his paper (with Phyllis Deane), “ The Take-off in Britain,” in Rostow, , Economics of Take-off, pp. 63–82Google Scholar. Important essays on the historical role of the entrepreneur are in Miller, William, ed., Men in Business (Cambridge, 1952)Google Scholar; especially relevant are John E. Sawyer, “ The Entrepreneur and the Social Order: France and the United States,” and Robert K. Lamb, “ The Entrepreneur and the Community,” pp. 7–22, 91–119. The Degler quotation is from Out of Our Past (New York, 1970), pp. 1–8Google Scholar.

36 Bruchey, , Roots of Economic Growth, pp. 208–9Google Scholar; Sawyer, , “ Entrepreneurship in Periods of Rapid Growth: The United States in the 19th Century,” Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth (Cambridge, 1954)Google Scholar, quoted in ibid., p. 209. For the reference to Tocqueville see Meyers, Marvin, The Jacksonian Persuasion: Politics and Belief (Stanford, 1957)Google Scholar.

37 McClelland, David C., The Achieving Society (Princeton, 1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Bruchey, , Roots of Economic Growth, pp. 178–93Google Scholar; Pye, Lucian W., ed., Communication and Political Development (Princeton, 1963)Google Scholar; Jansen, Marius B. and Stone, Lawrence, “ Education and Modernization in Japan and England,” CSSH, 9 (1966–1967), 208–32Google Scholar. On American education see especially Katz, Michael, The Irony of Early School Reform (Boston, 1968)Google Scholar.

39 Eisenstadt, S. N., ed., The Protestant Ethic and Modernization: A Comparative View (New York, 1968)Google Scholar; the quotation is from p. 20. Weber's essay was first published in German in 1902; the first English translation (by Talcott Parsons) was published in New York in 1930. For another analysis of Afrikaner Calvinism in South Africa, see Thompson, Leonard M.. “ The South African Dilemma,” in Hartz, , Founding of New Societies, pp. 178–218Google Scholar.

40 “ Reflections on the Protestant Ethic Analogy in Asia,” in Eisenstadt, , Protestant Ethic and Modernization, pp. 243–51Google Scholar; see also his Tokugawa Religion (Glencoe, 1957)Google Scholar, and Religion and Progress in Modern Asia (Glencoe, 1965)Google Scholar. On the Chinese in Southeast Asia see Coughlin, Richard J., Double Indentity: The Chinese in Modern Thailand (Hong Kong, 1960)Google Scholar.

41 Eisenstadt, Post-Traditional Societies, esp. the following articles: Eisenstadt, “ Post-Traditional Societies and the Continuity and Reconstruction of Tradition” Edward Leach, “ Buddhism in the Post-Colonial Order in Burma and Ceylon” S. J. Tambiah, “ The Persistence and Transformation of Tradition in Southeast Asia, With Special Reference to Thailand” Henry Bechert, “ Sangha, State, Society, ‘Nation’: Persistence of Tradition in ‘Post-Traditional’ Buddhist Societies.” See also Geertz, Clifford, “ Ritual and Social Change: A Javanese Example,” in Eisenstadt, , Comparative Perspectives on Social Change, pp. 94–113Google Scholar, Gombrich, Richard, “ Buddhist Karma and Social Control,” CSSH, 17 (04 1975), 212–20Google Scholar.

42 Thrupp, Sylvia L., ed., Millennial Dreams in Action: Essays in Comparative Study (The Hague, 1962)Google Scholar; Wilson, Bryan A., “ Millennialism in Comparative Perspective,” CSSH, 6 (1963–1964), 93–114Google Scholar; Barber, Bernard, “ Acculturation and Messianic Movements,” in Eisenstadt, , Comparative Perspectives on Social Change, pp. 177–83Google Scholar. Methodism and the English working class is discussed in Thompson, E. P., The Making of the English Working Class (New York, 1964)Google Scholar. On American religion and social reform see Hugins, The Reform Impulse; May, Henry F., Protestant Churches and Industrial America (New York, 1949)Google Scholar; Mann, Arthur, Yankee Reformers in the Urban Age (Cambridge, 1954)Google Scholar.

43 The Schlesinger article is in Fairbank, John K., ed., The Missionary Enterprise in China and America (Cambridge, 1974), pp. 336–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar; the quotation as well as the quotation from Hobson are from pp. 372–73. See also Fairbank, “ The Many Faces of Protestant Missions in China and the United States,” James A. Field Jr., “ Near East Notes and Far East Queries,” Paul A. Cohen, “ Littoral and Hinterland in 19th-century China: The ‘Christian’ Reformers,” in ibid., pp. 1–55, 197–225; and Carlson, Ellsworth C.. The Foochow Missionaries, 1847–1880 (Cambridge, 1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On missionaries in Southeast Asia see Lord, Donald C., “ Missionaries, Thai, and Diplomats,” Pacific Historical Review, 35 (1966), 413–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 See Wyman, Walker D. and Kroeber, Clifton B., The Frontier in Perspective (Madison, 1957)Google Scholar; Gerhard, Dietrich, “ The Frontier in Comparative View,” CSSH, 1 (1958–1959), 205–29Google Scholar; Hofstadter, Richard and Lipset, S. M., Turner and the Sociology of the Frontier (New York, 1968)Google Scholar.

45 Mikesell, “ Comparative Studies in Frontier History,” in ibid., pp. 152–71; the quotation is from p. 166. See also Galbraith, John S., “ The ‘ Turbulent Frontier ’ as a Factor in British Expansion,” CSSH, 2 (1959–1960), 150–68Google Scholar, for a thesis that is relevant to the expansion of the US and other nations.

46 See esp. Thernstrom, Stephan and Sennett, Richard, Nineteenth-Century Cities (New York, 1969)Google Scholar, and Thernstrom, , “ Urbanization, Migration and Social Mobility in Late Nineteenth Century America,” in Bernstein, Barton J., Towards a New Past: Dissenting Essays in American History (New York, 1968)Google Scholar.

47 Murphey, Rhoads, “ Traditionalism and Colonialism: Changing Urban Roles in Asia,” Journal of Asian Studies, 29 (1969), 67–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Murphey, “ The Treaty Ports and China's Modernization,” and Kapp, , “ Chungking as a Center of Warlord Power, 1926–1937,” in Elvin, Mark and Skinner, G. William, eds., The Chinese City Between Two Worlds (Stanford, 1974), pp. 17–71, 143–70Google Scholar.

49 Thompson, English Working Class, and “ Time, Work-Discipline and Industrial Capitalism,” Past and Present, 38 (1967), 56–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hobsbawm, , Labouring Men (New York, 1964)Google Scholar, and The Age of Capital, 1848–1875 (New York, 1975)Google Scholar.

50 Gutman, , “ Work, Culture and Society in Industrializing America,” American Historical Review, 78 (1973), 533–88Google Scholar; Montgomery, , “ The Working Classes of the Pre-Industrial American City, 1780–1830,” Labor History, 9 (1968), 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Bruce Laurie, “ ‘Nothing on Compulsion’: Life Styles of Philadelphia Artisans, 1820–1850,” and Faler, Paul, “ Cultural Aspects of the Industrial Revolution: Lynn, Massachusetts, Shoemakers and Industrial Morality, 1826–60,” Labor History, 15 (1974), 337–66, 367–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Morris, Morris D., “ The Recruitment of an Industrial Labor Force in India, With British and American Comparisons,” CSSH, 2 (1959–1960), 305–28Google Scholar.

52 Handlin, Oscar, Boston's Immigrants (Cambridge, 1941)Google Scholar; Ernst, Robert, Immigrant Life in New York City (New York, 1949)Google Scholar; Berthoff, Rowland, British Immigrants in Industrial America, 1790–1950 (Cambridge, 1953)Google Scholar.

53 Eisenstadt, , Modernization: Protest and Change, pp. 51–54, 83–84Google Scholar; Black, , Dynamics of Modernization, pp. 89–128Google Scholar.

54 Bendix, , “ Tradition and Modernity Reconsidered,” CSSH, 9 (1966–1967), 328–29Google Scholar.

55 Hopkins, Terence K., “ Third World Modernization in Transnational Perspective,” Annuls of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 386 (11 1969), 126–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar; the quotations are from pp. 130, 131, 133, 134.