Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:31:19.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Gender, Language and Hierarchy in Mamet's “Oleanna”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

Christine Macleod
Christine Macleod
Affiliation:
Christine MacLeod is Lecturer in American Studies, Faculty of Letters, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 218, Reading RG6 2AA, England.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ever since it was first staged in May 1992, Mamet's Oleanna seems, on both sides of the Atlantic, to have been perceived, publicised and reviewed almost exclusively as a manifestation of backlash sexual politics — that is, as a work characterised by outrage and hostility towards the agenda of contemporary feminism. Although the play entered the public arena too late to be addressed in Susan Faludi's 1992 study Backlash: The Undeclared War Against Women, its attitudes have typically been read as symptomatic of the same aggrieved and aggressive masculinity which Faludi diagnoses in such exemplary texts as Allan Bloom's The Closing of the American Mind (1987) and Roger Kimball's Tenured Radicals: How Politics Has Corrupted Our Higher Education (1990). The play also lends itself with deceptive ease to a comparison with one of Faludi's most alarming paradigms of backlash popular culture, the Hollywood blockbuster Fatal Attraction. Both narratives depict a fundamentally decent man, loyal to wife and family, who becomes the target of and is almost destroyed by the machinations of a vengeful single woman. In both cases the action culminates in an explosive physical assault on the offending female character. And, in performance, the violence of both denouements releases and apparently sanctions a similar surge of vicarious male aggression. Howls of “Kick her ass!” and “Kill the bitch!” were a regular occurrence at screenings of Fatal Attraction, and audience reaction to Oleanna has often followed the same pattern: Elaine Showalter reports a male acquaintance saying “I nearly climbed up on the stage to kick the shit out of the little bitch myself.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , August 1995 , pp. 199 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Faludi, Susan, Backlash: The Undeclared War Against Women (London: Vintage, 1992), 140Google Scholar.

2 Showalter, Elaine, “Acts of Violence: David Mamet and the Language of Men,” Times Literary Supplement, 6 11 1992, 16Google Scholar. Further references will be given in the text.

3 Mufson, Daniel, “Sexual Perversity in Viragos,” Theater, 24, 1 (1993), 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Headlines from Guardian Weekend, 12 June 1993; Independent, 1 July 1993; The Times, 1 July 1993; Sunday Times, 4 July 1993; Guardian, 7 July 1993.

5 Roiphe, Katy, The Morning After: Sex, Fear, and Feminism (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1993), 105Google Scholar.

6 A collection of epithets culled from Guardian, 7 July 1993; Elaine Showalter; Daniel Mufson; Independent on Sunday, 4 July 1993.

7 Billington, Michael, “Lessons for the Teacher,” Guardian, 1 07 1993Google Scholar.

8 Title of unsigned Profile, “David Mamet on Trial at the Court of Feminism,” Independent, 3 07 1993Google Scholar.

9 Paglia, Camille, Sex, Art, and American Culture (London: Penguin, 1992), 244Google Scholar.

10 Mamet, David, Oleanna (London: Methuen, 1993), 54Google Scholar. All subsequent references in the text are to this edition.

11 Lakoff, Robin, Talking Power: The Politics of Language (New York: Harper Collins, 1990), 155Google Scholar.

12 Zimmerman, Bonnie, “In Academia and Out,” in Changing Subjects: The Making of Feminist Literary Criticism, ed. Greene, Gayle and Kahn, Coppelia (London & New York: Routledge, 1993), 117Google Scholar.

13 Mamet, David, Glengarry, Glen Ross (London: Methuen, 1984), 44Google Scholar. All subsequent references are to this edition.

14 Mamet, David, American Buffalo (London: Methuen, 1978), 74–5Google Scholar.

15 Cited in Dean, Anne, David Mamet: Language as Dramatic Action (London & Toronto: Associated University Presses, 1990), 190Google Scholar.

16 Roudané, Matthew, “An Interview with David Mamet,” Studies in American Drama 1945-Present, 1 (1986), 74Google Scholar.

17 Ross, Andrew, “The Private Parts of Justice,” in Race-ing Justice, En-Gendering Power: Essays on Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas, and the Construction of Social Reality, ed. Morrison, Toni (London: Chatto & Windus, 1993), 43Google Scholar.

18 Nabokov's remarks are to be found in the Afterword to Lolita. Compare also Lacan, Jacques: “It is a world of words that creates a world of things.” Ecrits, trans. Sheridan, Alan (London: Tavistock, 1977), 65Google Scholar.

19 See MacKinnon, Catharine, Only Words (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993), passimGoogle Scholar.

20 Lakoff, 261.

21 Claudia Lacour, “Doing Things with Words,” in Morrison, ed. (see note 17), 137.

22 Mamet, David, A Whore's Profession: Notes and Essays (London & Boston: Faber, 1994), 140Google Scholar.

23 Roiphe, 107.

24 Billington, Michael, “Man Trouble,” Guardian Weekend, 12 06 1993, 9Google Scholar.

25 Said, Edward, Culture and Imperialism (London: Vintage, 1993), 34Google Scholar.

26 Roudané, Matthew, “Mamet's Mimetics,” in David Mamet: A Casebook, ed. Kane, Leslie (New York & London: Galand, 1992), 4Google Scholar.

27 bell hooks, Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black (Boston: South End Press, 1989), 20Google Scholar.