Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:33:48.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labour's Love Lost: Observations on the Historiography of Class and Ethnicity in the Nineteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

Peter Way
Peter Way
Affiliation:
Peter Way is Lecturer in American History, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QN, England. He would like to thank David Grimsted, Stephen Fender, Vivien Hart and other colleagues, for their comments on this paper.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the fall of 1828, Irish labourers digging Pennsylvania's Mainline Canal at Clark's Ferry, near Harrisburg, rioted when their employers — the Mammoth Contracting Company of New York — fell behind in wage payments by as much as $400 to skilled workers. The men soon returned to work, but in April the following year demanded a raise in wages from 80¢ to $1 until they paid off debts to local storeowners accumulated over the winter. The contractors refused, but the next day a freshet partially washed out the dam on the Susquehanna and threatened the canal works. The labourers, many of whom had been unemployed for some time, refused to repair it until their wage request was met. Canallers from the surrounding area arrived to join the protest. The contractors attempted to erect a temporary dam with a few loyal hands, but were attacked by strikers with rocks and clubs. Likewise, skilled workers who remained aloof were forced to halt work and join the turnout. The river broke through the dam causing $8–10,000 damage, but still the workers persisted in their strike.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , April 1994 , pp. 1 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This company was one of the first interstate canal-building firms and a company with a history of financial misdealings. In 1826, a number of its managers were arrested in Pittsburgh for violation of contracts with the Ohio Canal Commissioners. And the following year, agents of the Mammoth Company working at Hunter's Falls on the Pennsylvania Mainline stopped paying their workers, who burned their employers' shanty and stable in revenge. [Pottsville Pa.] Miner's Journal, 19 08 1826Google Scholar; Bedford [Pa.] Gazette, 5 Oct. 1827.

2 [Baltimore] American and Commercial Advertiser, 9 04 1829Google Scholar; [Philadelphia] Poulson's American Daily Advertiser, 8 04 1829Google Scholar. See also: Sullivan, William A., “A Decade of Labor Strife,” Pennsylvania History, 17 (01 1950), 32–33Google Scholar; Borgeson, Richard D., “Irish Canal Laborers in America; 1817–1846,” M.A. thesis, Pennsylvania State University, 1964, 48–51Google Scholar; Wallner, Peter A., “Politics and Public Works: A Study of the Pennsylvania Canal System, 1825–1857,” Ph.D. diss., Pennsylvania State University, 1973, 76Google Scholar.

3 Way, Peter, Common Labour: Workers and the Digging of North American Canals, 1780–1860 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Thompson, E. P., The Making of the English Working Class (Harmondsworth, England: Penguin, 1968)Google Scholar; Anderson, Perry, Arguments within English Marxism (London: Verso, 1980)Google Scholar; Price, Richard, Labour in British Society: An Interpretive History (London: Croom Helm, 1986), 4–5Google Scholar.

5 Gutman, Herbert G., Work, Culture, and Society in Industrializing America: Essays in American Working-Class History (New York: Vintage, 1977)Google Scholar; Wilentz, Sean, “Artisan Origins of the American Working Class,” International Labor and Working Class History, 19 (Spring 1981), 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wilentz, Sean, Chants Democratic: New York City and the Rise of the American Working Class, 1788–1850 (New York: Oxford, 1984)Google Scholar; Brody, David, Steelworkers in America: The Nonunion Era (orig. ed. 1960; New York: Harper & Row, 1969)Google Scholar; Montgomery, David, The Fall of the House of Labor: The Workplace, the State, and American Labor Activism, 1865–1925 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McDonnell, Lawrence, “‘You Are Too Sentimental’: Problems and Suggestions of a New Labor History,” Journal of Social History, 17 (Summer 1984), 629–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Wilentz, Sean, Chants Democratic, 14Google Scholar; Dawley, Alan, Class and Community: The Industrial Revolution in Lynn (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976)Google Scholar; Laurie, Bruce, Artisan into Workers: Labor in Nineteenth-Century America (New York: Noonday Books, 1989)Google Scholar. See also: Hirsch, Susan E., Roots of the American Working Class: The Industrialization of Crafts in Newark, 1800–1860 (USA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978)Google Scholar, and Prude, Jonathan, The Coming of Industrial Order: Town and Factory in Rural Massachusetts, 1810–1880 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983)Google Scholar.

7 It is an interpretation that has even been uncomfortably grafted on the history of women workers. For example, both Thomas Dublin's wish to see Lowell's women weavers as republican workers and Faye Dudden's treatment of domestic service as proletarianization from a community of “help” to the class lines of servant and mistress, with their shared themes of declension from a more humane and equal past, ring falsely alongside their handling of their subjects as women whose experience with gender exploitation transcends this model. Christine Stansell and Mary Blewett come closer to the mark in their handling of gender and class. Dublin, Thomas, Women at Work: The Transformation of Work and Community in Lowell Massachusetts, 1826–1860 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979)Google Scholar; Dudden, Faye E., Serving Women: Household Service in Nineteenth-Century America (Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press, 1983)Google Scholar; Stansell, Christine, City of Women: Sex and Class in New York, 1789–1860 (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Blewett, Mary, Men, Women, and Work: Class, Gender, and Protest in the New England Shoe Industry, 1780–1910 (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1988)Google Scholar.

8 Fink, Leon, “Looking Backward: Reflections on Workers' Culture and Certain Conceptual Dimensions within Labor History,” in Perspectives on American Labor History: The Problem of Synthesis, ed. Moody, J. Carroll and Kessler-Harris, Alice (Dekalb, Illinois: Northern Illinois University Press, 1989), 8Google Scholar.

9 Montgomery, David, “The Working Classes of the Pre-Industrial City, 1780–1830,” Labor History, 9 (Winter 1968), 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See, for example: Licht, Walter, Working for the Railroad: The Organization of Work in the Nineteenth Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983)Google Scholar; Stromquist, Shelton, A Generation of Boomers: The Pattern of Railroad Labor Conflict in Nineteenth-Century America (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Barrett, James, Work and Community in the Jungle: Chicago's Packinghouse Workers (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Mitchell, Brian C., The Paddy Camps: The Irish of Lowell 1821–61 (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1988)Google Scholar; Emmons, David, The Butte Irish: Class and Ethnicity in an American Mining Town (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1989)Google Scholar.

10 I make this argument at greater length in “Evil Humours and Ardent Spirits: The Rough Culture of Canal Construction Labourers,” Journal of American History, 79 (03 1993), 1397–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 See Graziosi, Andrea, “Common Laborers, Unskilled Workers: 1880—1915,” Labor History, 22 (Fall 1981), 512–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Montgomery, , Fall of the House of Labor, chapter 2Google Scholar; Way, Peter, “Shovel and Shamrock: Irish Workers and Labor Violence in the Digging of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal,” Labor History, 30 (Fall 1989), 489–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Way, “Evil Humours and Ardent Spirits.”

12 Henretta, James A., “Families and Farms: Mentalité in Pre-Industrial America,” William and Mary Quarterly v. 35 (01 1978), 3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nash, Gary, The Urban Crucible: The Northern Seaports and the Origins of the American Revolution (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Salinger, Sharon, “To Serve Well and Faithfully”: Labor and Indentured Servants in Pennsylvania, 1682—1800, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Innes, Stephen, ed., Work and Labor in Early America (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1988)Google Scholar; Rediker, Marcus, Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea: Merchant Seamen, Pirates, and the Anglo-American Maritime World, 1700–1750 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987)Google Scholar.

13 Rogers, Daniel T., “Republicanism: The Career of a Concept,” Journal of American History, 79 (06 1992), 11–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Jones, Gareth Stedman, Languages of Class: Studies in English Working Class History, 1832–1982 (London: Cambridge University Press, 1983)Google Scholar; Scott, Joan W., “On Language, Gender, and Working-Class History,” with responses by Bryan D. Palmer, Christine Stansell, and Anson Rabinbach, International Labor and Working-Class History, 31 (Spring 1987), 1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Appleby, Joyce, “One Good Turn Deserves Another: Moving beyond the Linguistic; A Response to David Harlan,” American Historical Review, 94 (12 1989), 1326–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Palmer, Bryan D., Descent Into Discourse: The Ratification of Language and the Writing of Social History (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

15 Richard Oestreicher has reviewed the on-going debate about the importance of class in workers' lives, which usually pivots on the issue of working-class politics and the primacy of ethnic affiliations. He admits that in late-nineteenth century Detroit, “immigrant workers and their children did function simultaneously in competing cultural systems appealing to contradictory loyalties,” and, as a result, voted for mainstream parties not radical alternatives, but argues that this fact might be more indicative of the closed political system than their parochialism or innate conservatism. “Urban Working-Class Political Behavior and Theories of American Electoral Politics,” Journal of American History, 74 (03 1988), 1268, 1275Google Scholar. See also his Solidarity and Fragmentation: Working People and Class Consciousness in Detroit, 1875–1900 (Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 1986)Google Scholar.

16 See, for example, Diggins, John P., “The Misuses of Gramsci,” Journal of American History, 75 (06 1988), 141–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar. David A. Gerber's recent study on Buffalo conveys what I would consider a liberal neo-consensus viewpoint. He claims to study “‘social pluralism’…a form of society characterized by public competition among large, complex groups composed of overlapping social solidarities.” Of these, he considers social class and ethnicity the most important, but treats them as one and the same. The cumulative effect of these competing tendencies is that the American system is able “to defuse and absorb conflict and to integrate new and foreign groups.” The Making of an American Pluralism: Buffalo, New York, 1825–1860 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1989), xi–xiiGoogle Scholar. There is a certain conceptual imprecision evident here, a mixing of apples and oranges that indicates a wish to treat everything evenhandedly and to have them play on a level field, which is a theoretical hallmark of the pluralist interpretation.

17 Brody, David, “The Old Labor History and the New: A Review Essay,” Labor History, 20 (Winter 1979), 111–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Montgomery, David, “To Study the People: The American Working Class,” Labor History, 21 (Fall 1980), 485–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fink, Leon et al. , “A Round Table: Historical Pessimism and Hegemony,” Journal of American History, 75 (06 1988), 115–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Moody and Kessler-Harris, eds., Perspectives on American Labor History.

18 Adams, William Forbes, Ireland and Irish Emigration to the New World from 1815 to the Famine (orig. ed. 1932; Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing, 1980), 2Google Scholar; Handlin, Oscar, The Uprooted (New York: Grosset & Dunlap, 1951), 4Google Scholar. See also: Handlin, , Boston's Immigrants: A Study in Acculturation (orig. ed. 1941; New York: Atheneum, 1970)Google Scholar; Ernst, Robert, Emigrant Life in New York City, 1825–1863 (New York: King's Crown Press, 1949)Google Scholar; Niehaus, Earl F., The Irish in New Orleans, 1800–1860 (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1965)Google Scholar; Duncan, Kenneth, “Irish Famine Immigration and the Social Structure of Canada West,” in Studies in Canadian Social History, ed. Horn, Michael and Sabourin, Ronald (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1974), 140–63Google Scholar.

19 For examples of the transplanted school, see: Clark, Dennis, The Irish in Philadelphia: Ten Generations of Urban Experience (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1973)Google Scholar; Conzen, Kathleen Neils, Immigrant Milwaukee, 1836–1860: Accommodation and Community in a Frontier City (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976)Google Scholar; Diner, Hasia R., Erin's Daughters in America: Irish Immigrant Women in the Nineteenth Century (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1983)Google Scholar; Bodnar, John, The Transplanted: A History of Immigrants in Urban America (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985)Google Scholar; Clark, Dennis, Hibernia America: The Irish and Regional Cultures (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1986)Google Scholar; Elliott, Bruce S.Irish Migrants in the Canadas: A New Approach (Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1988)Google Scholar.

20 Donald H. Akenson, in particular, has waged a relentless and quixotic battle against Handlin. See: The Irish in Ontario: A Study in Rural History (Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1984)Google Scholar; Being Had: Historians, Evidence, and the Irish in North America (Port Credit, Ontario: P. D. Meany Publishers, 1985)Google Scholar; and Small Differences: Irish Catholics and Irish Protestants, 1815–1922 An International Perspective (Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1988)Google Scholar.

21 Kerby Miller stands outside this growing consensus. His extensive examination of the Irish background to the most massive of migrations makes him painfully aware of the dwindling opportunity available to most Irish people. To a certain extent, then, he recapitulates the Irish Catholic peasant to disadvantaged North American model. At the same time, he is careful to outline a culture of emigration that led many, particularly Ulster Protestants, to view America as a place where one's position could be bettered. He is thus a combination of the push and pull interpretations, and consequently the most balanced of recent immigration studies. Miller, , Emigrants and Exiles: Ireland and the Irish Exodus to North America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985)Google Scholar.

22 Bodnar, , The Transplanted, xxGoogle Scholar.

23 See, for example, Park, Robert Ezra, Race and Culture (New York, Free Press, 1950)Google Scholar.

24 By comparison, Donald Akenson estimated that before the Famine immigration, Protestant Irish outnumbered Catholics two to one in Ontario. “Ontario: Whatever Happened to the Irish?”, Canadian Papers in Rural History, v. 3, ed. Akenson, (Gananoque, Ont.: Langdale Press, 1982), 220–21Google Scholar.

25 Sollors, Werner, “Introduction: The Invention of Ethnicity,” in the Invention of Ethnicity, ed. Sollors, Werner (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), ix–xx [quotations on xv, xix]Google Scholar.

26 Knobel, Dale, Paddy and the Republic: Ethnicity and Nationalism in Antebellum America (Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press, 1986), PrefaceGoogle Scholar; Gerber, , Making of an American Pluralism, xiv, 117Google Scholar.