Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:01:14.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The yield of durum wheats released in Mexico between 1960 and 1984

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. R. Waddington ,
M. Osmanzai ,
M. Yoshida  and
J. K. Ransom
S. R. Waddington
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Lisboa 27, Apartado Postal 6–641, 06600 México, D.F., México
M. Osmanzai
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Lisboa 27, Apartado Postal 6–641, 06600 México, D.F., México
M. Yoshida
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Lisboa 27, Apartado Postal 6–641, 06600 México, D.F., México
J. K. Ransom
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Lisboa 27, Apartado Postal 6–641, 06600 México, D.F., México
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two trials designed to measure progress in the yield of durum wheat cultivars released in Mexico by the Institute Nacional de Investigaciones Agrícolas over the period 1960–84 were grown in the Yaqui Valley, Sonora, Mexico, during the 1983–4 and 1984–5 cropping seasons. The trials compared grain yield, above-ground biomass, harvest index (ratio of dry grain yield to dry above-ground biomass), yield components, grain-growth rates and phenological characters for eight key cultivars and the modern advanced line, Carcomun ‘S’, when grown at a high level of agronomic inputs and management.

The grain yield of durum wheat was estimated to have risen for 25 years of breeding from 3·70 to 8·40 t/ha. The estimated average annual rates of increase in grain yield for the periods 1960–71 and 1971–85 were 251 and 121 kg/ha respectively. Grain yield improvements were based on a linear increase in the number of grains/m2 over the 25-year period, the result of more grains per spikelet. An improved above-ground biomass at maturity was a feature of the two modern genotypes, Altar 84 and Carcomun ‘S’. Harvest index increased with each new cultivar up to the release of Mexicali 75 in 1975, but thereafter the higher grain yields achieved with the modern genotypes were not associated with a higher harvest index. Thousand-grain weight remained steady for the released cultivars but fell slightly for the advanced line Carcomun ‘S’. Improvements in yield were not associated with a longer cropping cycle.

It is concluded that a breeding strategy combining selection for morphological characters thought to confer high yield potential, such as a more erect leaf posture and high number of grains per spikelet, with selection for grain yield per se has been successful in improving the grain yield of durum wheats adapted to north-west Mexico. Improvements have come not only in the size of the grain sink and the efficiency of assimilate partition to grain but also in the biomass produced above ground.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 108 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 469 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, R. B., Bingham, J., Blackwell, R. D., Evans, L. T., Ford, M. A., Morgan, C. L. & Taylor, M. (1980). Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 675–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brajcich, P., Vázquez, G. & Pfeiffer, W. H. (1985). Durum wheat. In CIMMYT Report on Wheat Improvement, 1983, pp. 32–47. Mexico City: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Donald, C. M. (1968). The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica 17, 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, C. M. (1979). A barley breeding programme based on an ideotype. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, C. M. & Hamblin, J. (1976). The biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Advances in Agronomy 28, 361–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, L. T. (1981). Yield improvement in wheat: empirical or analytical? In Wheat Science – Today and Tomorrow (ed. Evans, L. T. and Peacock, W. J.), pp. 203–222. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1975). Yield potential in a dwarf spring wheat and the effect of shading. Crop Science 15, 607–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1983). Growth of wheat. In Proceedings Symposium on Potential Productivity of Field Crops under Different Environments. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines, september 1980, pp. 129–154.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1985 a). Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 105, 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1985 b) Physiological limitations to producing wheat in semitropical and tropical environments and possible selection criteria. In Wheats for more Tropical Environments. Proceedings of the International Symposium, CIMMYT, Mexico City, September 1984, pp. 209–230.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A., Aguilar, I. & Laing, D. R. (1977). Post-anthesis sink size in a high-yielding dwarf wheat: yield response to grain number. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. A., Bidinger, F., Syme, J. R. & Wall, P. C. (1981). Leaf photosynthesis, leaf permeability, crop growth, and yield of short spring wheat genotypes under irrigation. Crop Science 21, 367–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. D., Marshall, G. A., Gregory, R. S. & Quick, J. S. (1981). Norin 10 semi-dwarfism in tetraploid wheat and associated effects on yield. Euphytica 30, 347–354.Google Scholar
Gale, M. D. & Youssefian, S. (1985). Dwarfing genes in wheat. In Progress in Plant Breeding 1 (ed. Russell, G. E.), pp. 1–35. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Gifford, R. M. & Evans, L. T. (1981). Photosynthesis, carbon partitioning, and yield. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 32, 485–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, P. R., Riggs, T. J., Klose, S. J. & Austin, R. B. (1985). High biomass genotypes in spring barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 105, 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (1978). Durum wheat. In CIMMYT Report on Wheat Improvement, 1978, pp. 33–52. Mexico City: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (1979). Durum wheat. In CIMMYT Report on Wheat Improvement, 1979, pp. 27–50. Mexico City: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (1980). Durum wheat. In CIMMYT Report on Wheat Improvement, 1980, pp. 19–29. Mexico City: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (1984). Yield potential of durum wheat. In CIMMYT 1983 Research Highlights, pp. 27–30. Mexico City: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Kulshrestha, V. P. & Jain, H. K. (1982). Eighty years of wheat breeding in India: past selection pressures and future prospects. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung 89, 19–30.Google Scholar
Leihner, D. E. & Ortiz, G. (1978). Improvement of durum wheat – plant type, yield potential, and adaptation. Euphytica 27, 785–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, T. J., Hanson, P. R., Start, N. D., Miles, D. M., Morgan, C. L. & Ford, M. A. (1981). Comparison of spring barley varieties grown in England and Wales between 1880 and 1980. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 97, 599–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, S. K., Aggarwal, P. K., Chaturvedi, G. S., Koundal, K. R. & Khanna-Chopra, R. (1981). A comparison of physiological and yield characters in old and new wheat varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 97, 233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, S. K. & Swaminathan, M. S. (1984). New parameters and selection criteria in plant breeding. In Crop Breeding. A Contemporary Basis (ed. Vose, P. B. and Blixt, S. G.), pp. 1–31. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Vázquez, G. &. Brajcich, P. (1984). Durum wheat. In CIMMYT Report on Wheat Improvement, 1982, pp. 24–43. Mexico City: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Waddington, S. R., Ransom, J. K., Osmanzai, M. & Saunders, D. A. (1986). Improvement in the yield potential of bread wheat adapted to northwest Mexico. Crop Science 26, 698–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar