Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:35:00.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Yield, nutritive value and ensiling characteristics of whole-crop spring cereals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. A. Lawes
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth
D. I. H. Jones
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth

Summary

The dry-matter yield, in vitro digestibility and crude protein content of four varieties of spring cereals (one barley, one wheat and two oats) were examined at weekly intervals at two levels of nitrogen fertilization during two successive years. The ensiling characteristics of crops cut at two dates were also determined. Dry-matter yields increased until the end of July. Digestibility and crude protein content declined until mid July when values of 56–60 and 6–7% for the barley and wheat, and 53–55 and 5–6% for the oats respectively were maintained. Crops of all varieties were suitable for ensiling at maximum yield.

Other experiments investigating level of whole-crop cereal yields obtainable with higher levels of fertility produced yields of over 16 metric tons D.M./ha with applications of 200–250 kg N, P2 O5 and K2O per hectare.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cannell, R. Q. & Jobson, H. T. (1968). The relationship between yield and digestibility in spring varieties of barley, oats and wheat after ear emergence. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 71, 337–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R. A., Donaldson, Elizabeth & MacGregor, A. W. (1968). Ensilage of whole-crop barley. 1. Effects of variety and stage of growth. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 19, 656–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, J. R. (1968). Whole crop barley for silage. N.A.A.S. q. Rev. 79, 117–20.Google Scholar
Jones, D. I. H. (1970). The ensiling characteristics of different herbage species and varieties. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 75, 293300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Playne, M. J. & McDonald, P. (1966). The buffering constituents of herbage and silage. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 17, 264–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, W. F. & Heard, A. J. (1968). The ensilage of whole-crop cereals. Ceres, Lond. 4, 711.Google Scholar
Rogers, H. H. (1967). Breeding for maximum production. Occasional Symposium Fodder Conservation, Br. Orassld Soc. 3, 6673.Google Scholar
Smith, Dale, Paulsen, G. M. & Raguse, C. A. (1964). Extraction of total available carbohydrates from grass and legume tissue. Pl Physiol. 39, 960–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in-vilro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18, 104–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J., Thorne, G. N. & French, S. A. W. (1963). Analysis of growth and yield of winter and spring wheats. Ann. Bot. 27, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar